The directors present the strategic report for the year ended 31 December 2024.

After a very strong set of results in 2023, the business was not able to maintain the same level of profit largely due to circumstances outside its control. Following an FCA ruling it was unable to sell insurance products for the majority of the year and the uncertainty over EV products and high interest rates reduced opportunity. Revenue for the year has decreased by 2.03%, gross profit has decreased to 3.96% (2023: 4.94%). Profit before tax of £96,272 (2023: £789,358) has decreased to 0.15% (2023: 1.22%). The company's net assets have decreased to £3,682,689 from £4,262,143.

The company is subject to a number of risks, but is now well placed to realise its full growth and profit potential. In this respect, the directors constantly monitor market conditions and modify stocking and pricing policies to manage and reflect the prevailing economic conditions.

Product cycle risk

As new vehicles move through their natural life cycle, the company's ability to maintain adequate margins can be impaired. In order to minimise the impact of this, the directors have developed a broad base of income sources from its franchised operations, including used vehicle sales, accident repair, service repair and component sales.

Competition risk

The markets in which the company operates are highly competitive and there is a risk that the company's customers will look to alternative sources for the products and services offered by the company. The directors have mitigated this risk by building a strong reputation for customer service, expanding its manufacturer representation, constantly monitoring quality of work and value for money.

The company continues to monitor competitor activity, customers views and their level of satisfaction and invests significantly in staff training and skills development, from full apprenticeships to continual improvement of all managers.

Stock value risk

The company is exposed as are all businesses in this industry to the risk of the value of its stock in trade falling due to general economic or industry specific factors. The directors mitigate this risk through a two-fold policy of ensuring that the company only carries stock of a suitable profile and price range that is appropriately aged and by a strict monthly write-down policy that immediately recognises any fall in value through its profit and loss account.

Interest rate risk

The company is exposed to changes in rates of interest. The directors review the risks of fluctuations in interest rates on a regular basis whilst analysing general economic conditions. Various sources of funding are used to mitigate risks of fluctuations.

Liquidity risk

This is managed by ensuring that stock levels are carefully controlled and adequate financing arrangements are in place to meet the company's on-going needs by fostering strong relationships with its bankers and franchisor.

The business continued to perform profitably in 2024 following on from the very strong performance in 2023, in what became a challenging marketplace as interest rates increased and customer confidence declined. The company was appointed the Genesis retailer for Hampshire in 2024 and this is expected to result in growth in 2025 as a physical presence is established at the site in Guildford, for this brand that is new to the UK market.

                31/12/2024    31/12/2023     Method of calculation    

Return on sales (%)        0.15        1.22        Profit before tax divided by turnover    

Gross margin (%)            3.96        4.94        Gross profit divided by turnover    

Capital expenditure (£'000)        61        56        Investment in capital in the year

Average number of staff        53        53        Average number from payroll record                

On behalf of the board

The directors present their report and financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2024.

The principal activity of the company is that of a franchised retail motor dealership.

The results for the year are set out on page 9.

The directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend.

The directors who held office during the year and up to the date of signature of the financial statements were as follows:

Moore (South) LLP were appointed auditor to the company and in accordance with section 485 of the Companies Act 2006, a resolution proposing that they be re-appointed will be put at a General Meeting.

The company has chosen in accordance with Companies Act 2006, s. 414C(11) to set out in the company's strategic report information required by Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, Sch. 7 to be contained in the directors' report.

So far as each person who was a director at the date of approving this report is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the company’s auditor is unaware. Additionally, the directors individually have taken all the necessary steps that they ought to have taken as directors in order to make themselves aware of all relevant audit information and to establish that the company’s auditor is aware of that information.

The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law, the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the profit or loss of the company for that period.

In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:

• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

• make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

• state whether applicable UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and

• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

We have audited the financial statements of Richmond Cars (Guildford) Limited (the 'company') for the year ended 31 December 2024 which comprise the income statement, the statement of comprehensive income, the statement of financial position, the statement of changes in equity, the statement of cash flows and notes to the financial statements, including significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

In our opinion the financial statements:

• give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 31 December 2024 and of its profit for the year then ended;

• have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and

• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Conclusions relating to going concern

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

Other information

The other information comprises the information included in the annual report other than the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of our audit:

• the information given in the strategic report and the directors' report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and

• the strategic report and the directors' report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report or the directors' report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:

• adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

• the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

• certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or

• we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial

Reporting Council’s website at: http://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our

auditor’s report.

The objectives of our audit in respect of fraud, are; to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of

the financial statements due to fraud; to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the assessed

risks of material misstatement due to fraud, through designing and implementing appropriate responses to those

assessed risks; and to respond appropriately to instances of fraud or suspected fraud identified during the audit.

However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both management and

those charged with governance of the company.

Our approach was as follows:

• The engagement partner selected a team for the audit, led by persons who had the required competence and skills to be able to identify or recognise non-compliance with laws and regulations, having previous experience in similar assignments.

• We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to the company and considered that the most significant from the perspective of the financial statements are the Companies Act 2006, UK financial reporting standards as issued by the Financial Reporting Council, and UK taxation legislation.

• We obtained an understanding of how the company complies with these requirements through discussions with management and those charged with governance. We also reviewed available correspondence with regulators to identify any known instances of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations.

• We assessed the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements, including the risk of material misstatement due to fraud and how it might occur, by holding discussions with management and those charged with responsibility for ensuring legal and regulatory compliance is adhered to and considered the internal controls in place to mitigate identified risks. Management override was identified as a significant risk from our assessment.

• Revenue recognition was also identified as a significant risk due to the timing of the revenue sources and the recognition criteria which could give rise to revenue being recorded other than in accordance with suitable accounting policies

• We assessed the control environment, documenting the systems, controls and processes adopted and undertook an assessment of risks identified in designing our audit approach, which incorporated a combination of tests of controls, analytical review and substantive procedures involving tests of transactions and balances. Any irregularities noted were discussed with management and those charged with governance and we obtained additional corroborative evidence as required.

There are inherent limitations in our audit procedures described above. The more removed that laws and

regulations are from financial transactions, the less likely it is that we would become aware of non-compliance.

Auditing standards also limit the audit procedures required to identify non-compliance with laws and regulations

to enquiry of the directors and other management and the inspection of regulatory and legal correspondence, if

any.

Material misstatements that arise due to fraud can be harder to detect than those that arise from error as they

may involve deliberate concealment or collusion.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and

timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we

identify during our audit.

Use of our report

This report is made solely to the company's member in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's member those matters we are required to state to the member in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's member, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

The income statement has been prepared on the basis that all operations are continuing operations.

Richmond Cars (Guildford) Limited is a private company limited by shares incorporated in England and Wales. The registered office is The Quay, 30 Channel Way, Ocean Village, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 3TG.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with FRS 102 “The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland” (“FRS 102”) and the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

The financial statements are prepared in sterling, which is the functional currency of the company. Monetary amounts in these financial statements are rounded to the nearest £1.

The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention modified to include the revaluation of leasehold properties. The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below.

At the balance sheet date, the company made a profit for the year of £true71k and had net assets at that date of £3,683k. Subsequent to the year end, the business has traded profitably ahead of budget and significantly ahead of the same period in 2024. The outlook for 2025 is ahead of 2024 as consumer confidence returns, interest rates begin to fall and the business is once again able to sell insurance and other value added products.

Management continue to investigate new ways to conduct business and develop manufacturer relationships, which combined with ongoing capital investments result in the company trading profitably. We continue to enjoy the full support of the bank and our franchise partners, all of whom are kept fully informed on the ongoing cashflow forecasts and financial performance projections.

As a result, the directors believe that the company will be able to continue in business and meet its liabilities as they fall due for a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements.

Turnover represents amounts receivable for goods and services net of VAT and trade discounts. Vehicles sales are recognised at the point at which goods are delivered to or collected by customers and the DVLA change of ownership is done.

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to the buyer (usually on dispatch of the goods or receipt of payment in full), the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity and the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

Revenue from contracts for the provision of services is recognised by reference to the stage of completion when the stage of completion, costs incurred and costs to complete can be estimated reliably. The stage of completion is calculated by comparing costs incurred, mainly in relation to contractual hourly staff rates and materials, as a proportion of total costs. Where the outcome cannot be estimated reliably, revenue is recognised only to the extent of the expenses recognised that are recoverable.

Leasehold property is initially measured as cost and subsequently stated at fair value under the revaluation model, less accumulated depreciation, and accumulated impairment losses.

Plant and Machinery and Fixtures, Fittings & Equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

Depreciation is recognised so as to write off the cost or valuation of assets less their residual values over their useful lives on the following bases:

The gain or loss arising on the disposal of an asset is determined as the difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying value of the asset, and is credited or charged to profit or loss.

At each reporting period end date, the company reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use.

If the recoverable amount of an asset is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease.

Recognised impairment losses are reversed if, and only if, the reasons for the impairment loss have ceased to apply. Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and estimated selling price less costs to complete and sell. Cost comprises direct materials and, where applicable, direct labour costs and those overheads that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition.

Inventories held for distribution at no or nominal consideration are measured at the lower of cost and replacement cost, adjusted where applicable for any loss of service potential.

At each reporting date, an assessment is made for impairment. Any excess of the carrying amount of inventories over its estimated selling price less costs to complete and sell is recognised as an impairment loss in profit or loss. Reversals of impairment losses are also recognised in profit or loss.

Cash and cash equivalents are basic financial assets and include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities.

The company has elected to apply the provisions of Section 11 ‘Basic Financial Instruments’ and Section 12 ‘Other Financial Instruments Issues’ of FRS 102 to all of its financial instruments.

Financial instruments are recognised in the company's statement of financial position when the company becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

Financial assets and liabilities are offset, with the net amounts presented in the financial statements, when there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

Basic financial assets, which include trade and other receivables and cash and bank balances, are initially measured at transaction price including transaction costs.

Other financial assets, including investments in equity instruments which are not subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures, are initially measured at fair value, which is normally the transaction price. Such assets are subsequently carried at fair value and the changes in fair value are recognised in profit or loss, except that investments in equity instruments that are not publicly traded and whose fair values cannot be measured reliably are measured at cost less impairment.

Financial assets, other than those held at fair value through profit and loss, are assessed for indicators of impairment at each reporting end date.

Financial assets are impaired where there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset, the estimated future cash flows have been affected. If an asset is impaired, the impairment loss is the difference between the carrying amount and the present value of the estimated cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. The impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss.

If there is a decrease in the impairment loss arising from an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the impairment is reversed. The reversal is such that the current carrying amount does not exceed what the carrying amount would have been, had the impairment not previously been recognised. The impairment reversal is recognised in profit or loss.

Financial assets are derecognised only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or are settled, or when the company transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to another entity, or if some significant risks and rewards of ownership are retained but control of the asset has transferred to another party that is able to sell the asset in its entirety to an unrelated third party.

Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the company after deducting all of its liabilities.

Basic financial liabilities, including trade and other payables, bank loans and loans from connected companies are initially recognised at transaction price. Financial liabilities classified as payable within one year are not amortised.

Trade payables are obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business from suppliers. Amounts payable are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less. If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities. Trade payables are recognised initially at transaction price.

Debt instruments that do not meet the conditions in FRS 102 paragraph 11.9 are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. Debt instruments may be designated as being measured at fair value though profit or loss to eliminate or reduce an accounting mismatch or if the instruments are measured and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy.

Financial liabilities are derecognised when the company’s contractual obligations expire or are discharged or cancelled.

Equity instruments issued by the company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of transaction costs. Dividends payable on equity instruments are recognised as liabilities once they are no longer at the discretion of the company.

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.

The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The company’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting end date.

Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all timing differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that they will be recovered against the reversal of deferred tax liabilities or other future taxable profits. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if the timing difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the tax profit nor the accounting profit.

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting end date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the income statement. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when the company has a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority.

The costs of short-term employee benefits are recognised as a liability and an expense, unless those costs are required to be recognised as part of the cost of stock or non-current assets.

The cost of any unused holiday entitlement is recognised in the period in which the employee’s services are received.

Termination benefits are recognised immediately as an expense when the company is demonstrably committed to terminate the employment of an employee or to provide termination benefits.

Payments to defined contribution retirement benefit schemes are charged as an expense as they fall due.

Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessees. All other leases are classified as operating leases.

Assets held under finance leases are recognised as assets at the lower of the assets fair value at the date of inception and the present value of the minimum lease payments. The related liability is included in the statement of financial position as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments are treated as consisting of capital and interest elements. The interest is charged to profit or loss so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.

Rentals payable under operating leases, including any lease incentives received, are charged to profit or loss on a straight line basis over the term of the relevant lease except where another more systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leases asset are consumed.

In the application of the company’s accounting policies, the directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised where the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods where the revision affects both current and future periods.

The following judgements (apart from those involving estimates) have had the most significant effect on amounts recognised in the financial statements.

Consideration has been given by the directors to the level of provision against vehicle stocks. In determining the provision required the directors have used guidance from independent valuation tools and their knowledge of the industry.

An analysis of the company's revenue is as follows:

The average monthly number of persons (including directors) employed by the company during the year was:

Their aggregate remuneration comprised:

The directors received no remuneration in respect of their services to the company during the year (2023: Nil). The directors are remunerated through Richmond Cars Ltd.

The actual charge for the year can be reconciled to the expected charge for the year based on the profit or loss and the standard rate of tax as follows:

In addition to the amount charged to the income statement, the following amounts relating to tax have been recognised directly in other comprehensive income:

The carrying value of land and buildings comprises:

Land and buildings with a carrying amount of £6,432,849 were revalued on 1 July 2025 to £5,430,000 by Colliers, an independent valuers not connected with the company on the basis of market value. The valuation conforms to International Valuation Standards and was based on recent market transactions on arm's length terms for similar properties.

Land and buildings are carried at valuation. If land and buildings were measured using the cost model, the carrying amounts would have been approximately £3,998,246 (2023 - £4,082,196), being cost £4,197,499 (2023 - £4,197,499) and depreciation £199,253 (2023 - £115,303).

Land and buildings with a carrying amount of £5,430,000 (2023 - £6,435,392) have been pledged to secure borrowings of the company. The company is not allowed to pledge these assets as security for other borrowings or to sell them to another entity.

The carrying amount of inventories includes £5,840,624 (2023 - £4,228,915) pledged as security for liabilities.

Vehicle stocking loans are secured against each individual asset concerned.

Finance lease payments represent rentals payable by the company for certain items of plant and machinery. Leases include purchase options at the end of the lease period, and no restrictions are placed on the use of the assets. The average lease term is 5 years. All leases are on a fixed repayment basis and no arrangements have been entered into for contingent rental payments.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where the company has a legally enforceable right to do so. The following is the analysis of the deferred tax balances (after offset) for financial reporting purposes:

The deferred tax net liability set out above is expected to reverse and relates to accelerated capital allowances, tax losses carried forward and the gain on revaluation of the company's property.

Deferred income represents an advance of commissions due for the period 1 January 2025 to 31 March 2025 by Hyundai. This advance is secured by the joint guarantee from Richmond Cars Limited and Richmond Cars (Southampton) Limited and a director Mr M R Nobes. The advance is interest free and repayable on demand.

The company operates a defined contribution pension scheme for all qualifying employees. The assets of the scheme are held separately from those of the company in an independently administered fund.

The revaluation reserve relates to the revaluation of leasehold property to market value.

The "transfer" in the year relates to the difference in depreciation between deprecation on the revalued amount and depreciation on the assets original cost. The excess depreciation has been transferred from the revaluation reserve to retained earnings.

The "other movement" in the year relates to the release of an accrual for lease premium that is no longer needed. This property had been revalued with the adjustments going through the revaluation reserve, therefore the release of the accrual has been posted against the revaluation reserve.

Profit and loss account

The profit and loss account represents accumulated comprehensive income for the year and prior periods less any dividends paid.

As part of the Richmond Cars group's banking arrangements the company has given an unlimited multilateral guarantee for the bank borrowings of Richmond Cars Limited. At 31 December 2024 the potential liability under this guarantee was £24,693,011 (2023: £25,303,959).

Operating lease payments represent rentals payable by the company for certain of its properties. These leases are negotiated for a period of 125 years. Other rentals are in respect of equipment which range from 2 to 5 years.

At the reporting end date the company had outstanding commitments for future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases, which fall due as follows:

Subsequent to the balance sheet date the company expects to complete the purchase of a leasehold premises adjacent to its current operations on the Slyfield Industrial Estate Guildford for £1.8 million. This purchase will allow significant expansion of its operations with the existing MG franchise moving to a site of its own freeing up space for a physical Genesis showroom.

During the year the company entered into trading transactions with Richmond Cars (Southampton) Limited, Richmond Cars Ltd, Richmond Cars (Fareham) Ltd, Richmond Cars (Botley) Ltd and Newmans (Southampton) Ltd, companies controlled by the directors. These transactions are conducted in accordance with accepted dealer transfer arrangements.

The company sold goods and services totalling £7,287,959 (2023: £7,090,758) to and purchased goods and services totalling £8,075,708 (2023: £8,144,410) from these companies in the year.

As at the year end the company owed £6,098,709 (2023: £6,298,085) to Richmond Cars (Southampton) Limited, £95,000 (2023: £Nil) to Newmans (Southampton) Ltd, and £97,293 (2023: £187) to Richmond Cars (Botley) Ltd.

As at the year end the company was owed £4,835,761 (2023: £4,809,681) by Richmond Cars Limited, and owed £373,000 (2023: £50,000 owed to) by Richmond Cars (Fareham) Ltd.

Management charges of £635,000 (2023: £569,000) were charged by Richmond Cars Limited for management and administration services provided.

An unlimited multilateral guarantee has been given to the company's bankers to secure all liabilities of Richmond Cars (Southampton) Limited and Richmond Cars Limited.

In addition, Mr M R Nobes, a director and shareholder, has given a personal guarantee to secure the company's bank facilities and the Hyundai stocking funding plan.

The ultimate controlling party is Mr M R Nobes, a director and sole shareholder.