We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Included in trade and other debtors are balances of £947,857 and £1,463,508 respectively owed by a non-connected company. The other debtor is a working capital loan whose repayment terms have been breached by the debtor company. Skylark Biomass Limited has not pursued payment or drawn up a new agreement. The last filed financial statements of the debtor company show it to be technically insolvent.
Skylark Biomass Limited has provided £5,500,000 against the original gross loan debt plus interest of £6,963,508 based on discounted cash flows for the RHI income generated from its plant located at the site of the debtor company. Management of Skylark Biomass Limited have taken a big picture view that the RHI cashflows and income is effectively a return on its own plant and on the debt owed by the debtor company.
We disagree with this rationale as paragraph 2.52 of FRS102 does not permit the offset of assets and liabilities, or income and expenses, unless required or permitted by FRS 102: it does not permit this in this case. Furthermore, SI 2008/409, Schedule 1, Section 8 (as found in the UK's Small Companies and Groups (Accounts and Directors' Report) Regulations 2008) sets out a general rule that balances and profits are not to be offset against each other, meaning that assets and liabilities, or income and expenses, cannot be set off against each other. This ensures clarity and prevents misrepresentation in a company's financial statements, providing a foundation for accounting principles.
Consequently we disagree with the lack of further provision against these two debtor balances of £947,857 and £1,463,508.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified opinion.