Veladail Leisure Limited is a private company limited by shares incorporated in England and Wales. The registered office is 7-12 Half Moon Street, Mayfair, London, W1J 7BH. The company's business address is Bushey Hall Golf Club, Bushey Hall Drive, Bushey, Hertfordshire, WD23 2EP.
The financial statements are prepared in sterling, which is the functional currency of the company. Monetary amounts in these financial statements are rounded to the nearest £.
During the year ended 31 December 2024, the company identified that certain costs relating to development activities incurred in prior periods had been incorrectly carried forward as assets within “Other Debtors”. These costs comprised planning, design, and legal fees associated with development activities incurred prior to the granting of planning permission, which, in accordance with the company’s accounting policy, should have been expensed.
The company has disclosed the nature and financial effect of these adjustments in the notes to the financial statements to ensure transparency and compliance with FRS 102 requirements for prior year adjustments.
The gain or loss arising on the disposal of an asset is determined as the difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying value of the asset, and is credited or charged to profit or loss.
Basic financial assets, which include debtors and cash and bank balances, are initially measured at transaction price including transaction costs and are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method unless the arrangement constitutes a financing transaction, where the transaction is measured at the present value of the future receipts discounted at a market rate of interest. Financial assets classified as receivable within one year are not amortised.
Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the company after deducting all of its liabilities.
Basic financial liabilities, including creditors and loans from fellow group companies, are initially recognised at transaction price unless the arrangement constitutes a financing transaction, where the debt instrument is measured at the present value of the future payments discounted at a market rate of interest. Financial liabilities classified as payable within one year are not amortised.
Trade creditors are obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business from suppliers. Amounts payable are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less. If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities. Trade creditors are recognised initially at transaction price and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Equity instruments issued by the company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of transaction costs. Dividends payable on equity instruments are recognised as liabilities once they are no longer at the discretion of the company.
Development cost
Development costs incurred in relation to the development of land, including planning, design, legal, and associated professional fees, are recognised as an asset when the company has control over the asset as a result of past events, it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the asset will flow to the company, and the costs can be measured reliably.
Development costs incurred prior to the granting of planning permission, or in respect of projects that are subsequently abandoned, do not meet the definition of an asset and are therefore expensed as incurred or written off.
Development costs incurred after planning permission has been granted, and for which it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the company, are considered for capitalisation in accordance with FRS 102. Such costs are included within tangible fixed assets, investment property, inventory, or prepayments, depending on the nature and intended use of the expenditure.
In the application of the company’s accounting policies, the directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised where the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods where the revision affects both current and future periods.
The following judgements (apart from those involving estimates) have had the most significant effect on amounts recognised in the financial statements.
The classification of assets requires the exercise of judgement by the company’s management. In particular, land represents the company’s primary tangible asset.
During the period of redevelopment planning, the land shall be classified based on management’s current intentions and assumptions regarding its future use. Until planning permission is obtained and a final decision is made by management regarding the land’s future function, the classification reflects the land’s current status and the anticipated outcomes under the redevelopment proposals.
Management will reassess the classification of the land upon receipt of planning permission and will adjust the accounting treatment in accordance with the decided future use.
In preparing the financial statements, management exercised significant judgement in determining the appropriate accounting treatment of development expenditure incurred on projects that had been granted planning permission, subsequently abandoned, or remained at the planning stage.
Under FRS 102, an asset is defined as a resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events, from which future economic benefits are expected to flow. Management assessed whether the development expenditure met this definition, taking into account both the degree of control over the resource and the probability that future economic benefits would arise.
Development costs incurred prior to the granting of planning permission, or in respect of projects that are subsequently abandoned, do not meet the definition of an asset and are therefore expensed as incurred or written off.
Development costs incurred after planning permission has been granted, and for which it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the company, are considered for capitalisation in accordance with FRS 102. Such costs are included within tangible fixed assets, investment property, inventory, or prepayments, depending on the nature and intended use of the expenditure.
The average monthly number of persons (including directors) employed by the company during the year was:
The company operated as a golf course until October 2019, when activities were suspended to facilitate the progression of redevelopment plans. During the year ended 31 December 2024, the company re-submitted redevelopment proposals and entered into a promotional agreement with a developer. Under this agreement, upon obtaining planning permission, the company shall retain pre-emption rights over the land, while the promoter shall have the right to purchase the land under certain conditions should the company elect not to exercise these rights.
The land and building costs amounting to £2,000,000 represent the deemed cost of the land following the disposal of the clubhouse building as part of the progression of the development project. The original cost of the land, prior to revaluation and the transition to FRS 102, was £836,164 (2023: £836,164).
The prepayments amounting to £1,009,295 (2023: £1,009,295) represent Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) payments made in respect of development projects that had commenced following the granting of planning permission. The project was subsequently suspended while the company pursued alternative development plans.
In accordance with the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010, these payments are expected to be either credited against future development schemes upon approval of the alternative project, or recovered through the disposal of the land, which already benefits from existing planning permission.
During the year ended 31 December 2024, the company entered into a promoter agreement in respect of land development. Under the terms of this agreement, the promoter may become entitled to a fee if specific conditions are satisfied, including the granting of planning permission, the market valuation of the land meeting a minimum value as defined in the agreement, and the company exercising its pre-emption rights in relation to the land.
As part of the same agreement, the company is also obligated to refund rechargeable costs amounting to £362,792 as at 31 December 2024 (2023: £Nil) if the pre-emption rights are exercised.
As at the reporting date, these conditions had not been fully satisfied and, accordingly, no present obligation exists. No provision has therefore been recognised in the financial statements. The potential obligation represents a contingent liability, which may arise in future periods should the relevant conditions be met, and the amount of any future payment cannot be reliably estimated at this stage.
The company had operated as a golf course until October 2019, when activities were suspended to enable the progression of redevelopment plans. During the year, the company re-submitted redevelopment proposals and entered into a promotional agreement with a developer. Under this agreement, the company retains pre-emption rights over the land, while the promoter has the right to purchase the land under certain conditions should the company decide not to exercise its rights.
Subsequent to the year end the planning committee of Hertsmere Borough Council voted to approve the scheme subject to the necessary relevant formalities and legal agreements which need to be executed. The revised development proposals do not include the golf course.
As at the signing date, neither the pre-emption rights had been exercised nor had the land been disposed of to the promoter.
During the year ended 31 December 2024, the company identified that certain costs amounting to £319,418 relating to development activities incurred in prior periods had been incorrectly carried forward as assets within “Other Debtors”. These costs comprised planning, design, and legal fees associated with development activities incurred prior to the granting of planning permission, which, in accordance with the company’s accounting policy, should have been expensed. The adjustments have been reflected in the prior year profit and loss or retained reserves as follows:
A prior year adjustment of £154,791 has been recognised in the financial statements to correct the classification of development costs relating to a new project incurred during the year ended 31 December 2023. At that date, the project was still in the planning stage and planning permission had not yet been granted.
A prior year adjustment amounting to £164,627 has been recognised in the financial statements to correct the classification of development costs incurred during the years ended 31 December 2021 and 31 December 2022. These costs related to a new project which, at the respective year ends, remained in the planning stage and for which planning permission had not yet been granted.
As the income statement has been omitted from the filing copy of the financial statements, the following information in relation to the audit report on the statutory financial statements is provided in accordance with s444(5B) of the Companies Act 2006.