Acorah Software Products - Accounts Production 19.1.200 false true 31 July 2024 1 August 2023 true 23 April 2026 1 August 2024 31 July 2025 31 July 2025 12082923 Micheal John Ainsworth Jessica Cordingly Lydia El-Khouri Leila Fazal Agnes Patricia Hall Sarah Mills Dr Alexandra Jane Parsons Christina Ann Poulton Richard Cameron Wilson iso4217:GBP iso4217:EUR iso4217:USD xbrli:shares xbrli:pure xbrli:pure 12082923 2024-07-31 12082923 2025-07-31 12082923 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-core:CurrentFinancialInstruments 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:CompanyLimitedByGuarantee 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:FullAccounts 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:SmallEntities 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Audited 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:SmallCompaniesRegimeForAccounts 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:SmallCompaniesRegimeForDirectorsReport 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director1 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director2 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director2 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director3 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director4 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director4 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director5 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director5 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director6 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director7 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director7 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director8 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director8 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director9 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-bus:Director9 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-core:CurrentFinancialInstruments 1 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-core:CurrentFinancialInstruments 2 2025-07-31 12082923 frs-countries:EnglandWales 2024-08-01 2025-07-31 12082923 2023-07-31 12082923 2024-07-31 12082923 2023-08-01 2024-07-31 12082923 frs-core:CurrentFinancialInstruments 2024-07-31 12082923 frs-core:CurrentFinancialInstruments 1 2024-07-31 12082923 frs-core:CurrentFinancialInstruments 2 2024-07-31
Registered number: 12082923
Reliable Media
Directors' Report and
Financial Statements
For The Year Ended 31 July 2025
The GKP Partnership
Contents
Page
Company Information 1
Directors' Report 2—7
Independent Auditor's Report 8—10
Income Statement 11
Statement of Financial Position 12
Notes to the Financial Statements 13—14
Page 1
Company Information
Directors Micheal John Ainsworth
Jessica Cordingly
Lydia El-Khouri
Leila Fazal
Agnes Patricia Hall
Sarah Mills
Dr Alexandra Jane Parsons
Christina Ann Poulton
Richard Cameron Wilson
Company Number 12082923
Registered Office 3rd Floor Suite
207 Regent Street
London
W1B 3HH
Auditors The GKP Partnership
139 Viglen House
Alperton Lane
London
Wembley
HA0 1HD
Page 1
Page 2
Directors' Report
The directors present their report and the financial statements for the year ended 31 July 2025.
Principal Activity
The principal activity of the company in the year under review was that of non-profit organisation.
Directors
The directors who held office during the year were as follows:
Micheal John Ainsworth Appointed 18/04/2025
Jessica Cordingly Appointed 14/07/2025
Lydia El-Khouri
Leila Fazal Appointed 14/07/2025
Agnes Patricia Hall
Sarah Mills Appointed 18/04/2025
Dr Alexandra Jane Parsons Appointed 18/04/2025
Christina Ann Poulton Appointed 18/07/2025
Richard Cameron Wilson
Statement of Directors' Responsibilities
The directors are responsible for preparing the Report of the Directors and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law the directors must not
approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the surplus or deficit of the company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:
- select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently; 
- make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
- prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. 
Director’s Report for the Annual Accounts
Introduction
Democracy depends on accurate and reliable media, yet the rise of online advertising has made it easier than ever for ‘bad actors’ to spread and profit from misinformation and hate.
The resulting global surge in toxic online content demonising minority groups has helped to fuel the rise of far right ideologies which thrive on spreading hatred and division, threatening democracy and human rights worldwide. Meanwhile the proliferation of disinformation has been a gift to those seeking to undermine climate science and block climate action, worsening the devastation already being caused by climate change, and putting the survival of human civilisation at risk.       
Reliable Media’s long-term goal is to bring about more responsible media by making hate and misinformation unprofitable and tackling the wider systemic problems that have created a global disinformation crisis.
In the meantime we seek to reduce the harms of problematic media and shift the financial incentives in a more positive direction.
...CONTINUED
Page 2
Page 3
We do this by:
● Engaging with advertisers through our  #StopFundingHeat and #StopFundingHate campaigns, which mobilise people via social media and other online channels to urge companies to pull their ads from problematic media.
● Challenging and discrediting media that spread misinformation and hate, reducing the effectiveness of their messages. 
● Building solidarity and support for organisations and individuals facing threats, online abuse and intimidation after being targeted by hostile media.
Strategic Shifts and Impacts 2024/25
One organisation- integrated campaigns
The financial year 2024/25 has been a transformative one for Reliable Media. In August 2024, the core campaigning activities of Stop Funding Hate were transferred to Reliable Media from Stop Funding Hate CIC. Both the Stop Funding Heat and Stop Funding Hate campaigns now sit under the Reliable Media “umbrella,” enabling us to operate with greater strategic coherence and – crucially – to highlight the link between media and hateful political rhetoric, previously impossible under CIC restrictions around campaigning activities. 
Yet the large-scale racist violence that took place in Britain during the same month brought a stark reminder of why we do this work – and why this change was needed. The racist riots were widely seen to have been fuelled both by inflammatory media narratives and toxic political rhetoric, as well as misinformation and racist hatred spread via social media.
Financial Impact on GB News
A major focus for both Stop Funding Hate and Stop Funding Heat continued to be GB News. GB News coverage has been extreme even by UK media standards – spreading hate narratives and downplaying climate risks. 
Our integrated campaigns achieved measurable impact, with the channel’s accounts revealing losses exceeding £33 million in the 2023/2024 financial year - and confirmed cumulative total losses of £100 million since 2021 – amid ongoing complaints from GB News presenters about the impact of Stop Funding Hate’s campaign: GB News admits that the #StopFundingHate campaign is working - YouTube 
Advertiser wins
Our monitoring found that over 90 advertisers quietly withdrew from the channel since November 2024. Notably, the vast majority of companies chose not to publicly acknowledge their departure or when they had pulled their ads. This points to a chilling effect in which the far right’s capacity to intimidate is not only shaping where corporate money flows, but whether companies are willing to speak out and defend progressive values.  
One significant win was in February 2025 which saw one of Stop Funding Hate’s biggest supporter mobilisations in several years, with thousands of people taking action after Marks and Spencer were found to be advertising on GB News radio. Although there was no public statement from the company, M&S advertising disappeared from GB News in early March and – and at the time of writing – has not been seen since.  
Expanding our media monitoring system 
The expansion of our GB News campaign has been supported by our in house media monitoring system, which we’ve significantly improved and upgraded over the past 12 months. This has enabled much more detailed tracking of GB News output. That in turn has strengthened our ability to make the case to advertisers about the channel’s toxic character and raise the alarm more widely about the harm being done by its coverage.
One key priority has been to respond to a disturbing uptick in extreme rhetoric targeting migrants, refugees, Muslims, trans people and other minority communities, both on GB News and in other UK media. In December 2024, the Muslim Council of Britain accused GB News of “a deeply concerning pattern of bias and misinformation targeting Muslims. From perpetuating harmful tropes to framing Muslims as threats, GB News appears to be fuelling hatred and further dividing Britain.”  In January 2025, a trans contributor quit GB News after a presenter made comments associating the LGBTQ+ community with paedophilia. This prompted thousands of complaints to Ofcom.
Our GB News data has featured in a number of media reports this year, including a hard-hitting piece from Byline Times highlighting the rise in dangerous anti-migrant rhetoric on the channel: GB News Ramps Up Migrant 'Invasion' Rhetoric as Channel Veers Far Right – Byline Times
We also worked with Good Law Project to produce a detailed analysis of the damaging tropes on the channel, using the new analysis tools we developed this year:
GB News: The skewed language that fuels a propaganda factory | Good Law Project
...CONTINUED
Page 3
Page 4
Thanks to our increased capacity and the improvements to our media monitoring system, we have fully extended our monitoring to cover Talk Radio, whose coverage has also been a source of growing concern. Through our monitoring we have identified dozens of examples of biased and misleading coverage from both GB News and Talk Radio downplaying the risks of climate change and undermining climate action. 
Via the Stop Funding Heat campaign we worked with DeSmog on a series of articles, including an in-depth analysis of Talk Radio’s climate coverage, based on our monitoring data: Murdoch-Owned TalkRadio Airs Anti-Climate Attacks Six Times a Day - DeSmog. 
Stop Funding Heat submitted a series of complaints about this coverage to the broadcasting regulator Ofcom.
Regulatory – Our Ofcom campaign
Our media monitoring tool has been essential to our ability to support regulatory complaints. Over the course of the year, Stop Funding Heat submitted a series of complaints to Ofcom about climate misinformation on both GB News and Talk Radio, while Stop Funding Hate worked with Good Law Project to submit over 70,000 complaints about homophobic hate broadcast by GB News.
However, the regulator's response has been a source of growing concern. Despite multiple complaints to Ofcom, including clear breaches of the Broadcasting Code, the regulator remained reluctant to take action. During the year, we began exploring ways to escalate the issue with Parliament, which oversees Ofcom and holds scrutiny power over the regulator. However, in May 2025, an Ofcom evidence session in parliament saw the committee chair dismiss serious concerns about broadcasting standards - reinforcing a pattern of inaction that has been a recurring theme throughout the year.
This experience has prompted a deliberate shift in our approach. While we continue to use formal regulatory channels, we have increasingly focused on publicly exposing both the harmful content being broadcast and the regulator's failure to act on it. Our monitoring data has enabled us to document, for example, how GB News has relentlessly promoted a grooming gangs narrative linked to the Pakistani community — with specific inflammatory phrases appearing hundreds of times over a matter of months, in clear breach of established journalistic codes against making an issue of perpetrators' ethnicity.
Rather than relying on Ofcom to identify and act on these patterns, we are now proactively sharing this evidence with journalists, parliamentarians and civil society partners- positioning the data as an accountability tool aimed at both the broadcaster and the regulator. This shift from complaint-making to public accountability reflects a wider lesson from the year: working within the system remains important, but where the system is failing, it must itself be challenged.
Partners and allies 
Partnership working continued to be an important aspect of our work. In February 2025, we established a formal partnership with Good Law Project which has enabled both organisations to identify opportunities for joint action and amplify each other’s campaign targeting of GB News and other media outlets.  
In March, we collaborated with the founder of Trans History Week Marty Davies, who wrote a hard-hitting article in the UK’s leading advertising industry publication, Campaign, highlighting GB News’s repeated targeting of trans and LGBTQ+ people. The column also challenged Sky over its role brokering ad sales for GB News, and advertising on the channel directly – both adding to the pressure on Sky and sending a clear signal to other companies about the brand risks of associating with GB News.  
In June 2025, we launched a joint Pride Month campaign targeting online advertisers on the GB News website. We focused on companies making public LGBTQ+ inclusion statements while advertising on the channel. The campaign generated 10,000+ signatures
Ahead of Pride Month in June, Stop Funding Hate launched a joint campaign with Good Law Project targeting companies who had made positive statements about LGBTQ+ inclusion but had also advertised on the GB News website. Alongside encouraging these advertisers to exclude GB News from their online advertising, our goal was to raise awareness with agencies and brands more broadly – and encourage others to proactively exclude the channel. This received an additional boost when our work was again featured in Campaign – this time in a news piece highlighting our joint action with Good Law Project targeting GB News’s online advertisers.
Over the course of the year, Stop Funding Hate has been working with partners in the migration and refugee sector on a new collaborative project exploring how corporate campaigning tactics can be applied more widely to challenge the companies and media outlets that enable and profit from anti-migrant policies. The project, provisionally titled "Bad Actors", is still developing but there are encouraging signs of progress: by the end of 2025, a date had been set and funding secured for an initial workshop with refugee and migrant organisations to explore options.
Solidarity – behind the scenes support
Following the upsurge in online and abuse against charities supporting migrants and refugees, we have also been piloting a new “early warning system” which automatically alerts us if an organisation we know is mentioned on GB News or Talk Radio, so that we can warn them.
...CONTINUED
Page 4
Page 5
This is significant because we’ve seen a repeated pattern in which charities targeted by one of these channels have then been inundated with online abuse and threats. If we can alert an organisation at the earliest possible stage, this can both help them to prepare and help contextualise any abuse or threats which follow.
Alongside this behind-the-scenes support, we have also used our social media channels to amplify individual responses from organisations who have been targeted and encouraged #StopFundingHate supporters to show solidarity. 
The feedback we’ve had from a number of groups has been that, together with the practical benefits of our early warning system, knowing that another organisation was looking out for them also helped to maintain morale amid attacks they were facing.
Challenging Twitter
Amid ongoing concerns about Elon Musk’s use of Twitter / X to spread extremist content, in September we began stepping up our efforts to persuade advertisers to pull from the platform. 
While the algorithmic nature of online advertising makes it more difficult to track Twitter’s advertisers comprehensively, two brands that we identified when we began stepping up the campaign - Hellofresh and Flixbus - have not reappeared in our monitoring.
Given that Musk has pursued vexatious legal cases against a number of groups who have targeted Twitter advertisers (while simultaneously claiming to be a free speech champion), we have taken out enhanced legal insurance which - while still limited - would allow us to fight any such claim and seek to get it struck out. 
Despite the legal risks, the scale of Musk’s efforts to shift the boundaries of acceptable discourse - and the limits of what advertisers are prepared to align themselves with - together with his particular focus on the UK (including showing support for extremist figures such as Stephen Yaxley-Lennon - aka Tommy Robinson) makes this something that we believe we must tackle.
We also know from speaking to other groups working in this space that Elon Musk’s aggressive response to criticism has had a significant “chilling effect” and led to a reduction in organisations willing to shine a light on the extent of hate and misinformation on Twitter. 
The campaign is still developing, but we have already identified a list of prominent organisations who have recently been advertising on Twitter - including high-profile brands like Apple, Google, Dell and the UK’s National Lottery - and begun targeting specific advertisers. 
This new focus has also created opportunities to connect with other organisations who have concerns about Twitter and big tech more broadly - including Amnesty UK and the People vs Big Tech coalition. Given that Twitter is a global platform - and that many of the issues on the site which affect the UK are also impacting other countries in Europe and across the world.
Our supporter community
Our supporters remain at the heart of our work, and this year has seen significant growth in both the size and engagement of our supporter base. In August 2024, shortly after the racist riots, we conducted a supporter survey to better understand the motivations and priorities of our community. Anti-migrant rhetoric in the Daily Mail and other tabloids continued to be a key concern, alongside the vilification of asylum seekers and refugees and the normalisation of far-right language in mainstream discourse. The survey also highlighted a clear appetite for more practical tools — including guidance and templates to help supporters message advertisers directly. As one respondent put it: "Organisations such as Stop Funding Hate give me a small measure of hope that not all is lost. Thank you."
This feedback has informed our approach to supporter communications throughout the year, and we have invested in strengthening the quality and consistency of our messaging including bringing in a freelance copywriter and developing a more distinctive editorial voice across our supporter emails and social media channels. Research conducted with Cardiff University also provided valuable demographic and motivational data that will continue to shape our communications strategy going forward.
In October 2024, Stop Funding Hate launched its first petition under the new structure, which helped to grow the email list by several hundred new subscribers. A further boost came in early 2025 when an online petition targeting Sky- boosted by video clips from our monitoring team - drove a significant wave of new sign-ups, with large numbers of petitioners opting in to receive ongoing communications. By the end of the year, Stop Funding Hate had also launched a WhatsApp channel to enable more direct and responsive communication with supporters.
Fundraising 
The work of Stop Funding Hate and Stop Funding Heat is made possible through the generous donations of our supporters and funding partners, and we are hugely grateful to everyone who has backed our work again this year.
...CONTINUED
Page 5
Page 6
During 2024/25 we were fortunate to secure a number of significant new grants. In March 2025, the Paul Hamlyn Foundation approved £200,000 in flexible core funding for Reliable Media. We also secured significant renewed funding from the KR Foundation for Stop Funding Heat's climate-focused work.  
In January 2025, we launched a crowdfunder highlighting the threat of GB News importing Donald Trump's media playbook to Britain. The campaign featured a video of GB News presenter Nigel Farage complaining about the impact Stop Funding Hate had been having - which resonated strongly with supporters. The crowdfunder exceeded its initial target within two weeks, passed its stretch target of £15,000, and ultimately closed at £24,700. The comments left by donors on the page provided a valuable qualitative picture of what is motivating people to support our work and will help inform our longer-term individual giving strategy.
Looking ahead, we recognise that growing our individual giving income is essential to the organisation's long-term sustainability. Work is underway to develop a regular giving strategy that can convert the energy and commitment of our supporter community into a more reliable income stream.
Governance and organisational development
The transition to Reliable Media has been accompanied by significant investment in governance and organisational infrastructure over the course of the year.
In early 2024, a governance working group was established to drive through the transition of Stop Funding Hate to its new legal structure, which completed in August 2024. In September, the combined boards of Stop Funding Hate and Reliable Media met for the first time, face to face, to discuss key principles and priorities for the campaigns going forward. Two of the board members were originally members of the Stop Funding Hate steering group established in 2021, and both played key roles in supporting the organisation through the transition period- including responding to media attacks and political targeting of Stop Funding Hate.
As the organisation has grown, we have also begun putting in place the policies and structures needed to support a more formal staffing model. In July 2025, the board approved a budget, salary structure and employment contracts, enabling two core team members to move from freelance contractor arrangements to employed roles in August 2025. A benchmarking exercise was carried out to ensure that pay levels were fair and appropriate, and legal indemnity insurance was secured to protect the organisation and its staff.
Alongside these operational developments, we have established an anti-oppression working group to ensure that our governance, staffing and campaign practices are fully aligned with our values, address the need for greater diversity within our decision-making structures, and tackle barriers to participation in our work. This reflects a commitment made during the transition process and is informed by conversations with other organisations whose approaches to lived experience governance has provided a useful model for how we might develop our own advisory structures in the future.
We have also invested in legal preparedness, commissioning training on media law to help the team navigate the legal risks associated with our campaigning work. This has provided practical guidance on how to strengthen our communications while minimising legal exposure an increasingly important consideration given the media attacks and trolling campaigns we have faced this year.
Page 6
Page 7
Statement of Disclosure of Information to Auditors
So far as the directors are aware, there is no relevant audit information (as defined by Section 418 of the Companies Act 2006) of which the company's auditors are unaware, and each director has taken all the steps that he or she ought to have taken as a director in order to make himself or herself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the company's auditors are aware of that information. 
AUDITORS
The auditors, The GKP Partnership, will be proposed for re-appointment at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
Small Company Rules
This report has been prepared in accordance with the special provisions relating to companies subject to the small companies regime within Part 15 of the Companies Act 2006.
On behalf of the board
Richard Cameron Wilson
Director
23/04/2026
Page 7
Page 8
Independent Auditor's Report
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of Reliable Media (the 'company') for the year ended 31 July 2025 which comprise the Income Statement, Statement of Financial Position and Notes to the Financial Statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 'The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland' (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice). 
In our opinion the financial statements:
- give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 31 July 2025 and of its surplus for the year then ended;
- have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and 
- have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. 
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Conclusions Relating to Going Concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least 12 months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
Other Information
The other information comprises the information included in the annual report, other than the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Matters on Which We Are Required to Report by Exception
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit,
we have not identified material misstatements in the Report of the Directors.
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters where the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
- adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or 
- the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
- certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or 
- we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or 
- the directors were not entitled to prepare the financial statements in accordance with the small companies regime and take advantage of the small companies' exemption from the requirement to prepare a Strategic Report or in preparing the Report of the Directors. 
Page 8
Page 9
Responsibilities of Directors
As explained more fully in the Directors' Responsibilities Statement set out on page 2—7, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue a Report of the Auditors that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs(UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:
Our approach to identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement in respect of irregularities, including fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations, was as follows:
- the engagement partner ensured that the engagement team collectively had the appropriate competence, capabilities and skills to identify or recognize non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations; 
- we identified the laws and regulations applicable to the company through discussions with directors and other management, and from our commercial knowledge and experience of the industry;
- we assessed the extent of compliance with the laws and regulations identified above through making enquiries of management and inspecting legal correspondence; and identified laws and regulations were communicated within the audit team regularly and the team remained alert to instances of non-compliance throughout the audit.
We assessed the susceptibility of the company's financial statements to material misstatement, including obtaining an understanding of how fraud might occur, by: 
- making enquiries of management as to where they considered there was susceptibility to fraud, their knowledge of actual, suspected and alleged fraud; and
- considering the internal controls in place to mitigate risks of fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations.
To address the risk of fraud through management bias and override of controls, we:
- performed analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships;
- tested journal entries to identify unusual transactions; 
- assessed whether judgements and assumptions made in determining the accounting estimates were indicative of potential bias; and
- investigated the rationale behind significant or unusual transactions.
In response to the risk of irregularities and non-compliance with laws and regulations, we designed procedures which included, but were not limited to:
- agreeing financial statement disclosures to underlying supporting documentation;
- reading the minutes of meetings of those charged with governance;
- enquiring of management as to actual and potential litigation and claims; and
- reviewing correspondence with HMRC, relevant regulators, and the company's legal advisors.
We focused our audit procedures on assessing whether revenue was recognized in the appropriate accounting period and whether any revenue was inappropriately recorded to manipulate financial performance.
Our audit procedures included, but were not limited to:
- evaluating the revenue recognition policies for compliance with applicable accounting standards. 
- testing a sample of sales invoices to confirm the accuracy and existence of recorded revenue by agreeing the invoice amounts to supporting documentation.
- performing cut-off testing to verify that revenue was recognized in the correct period.
Based on the procedures performed, we did not identify any material misstatements in revenue recognition.
There are inherent limitations in our audit procedure described above. The more removed that laws and regulations are from financial transactions, the less likely it is that we would become aware of non-compliance. Auditing standards also limit the audit procedures required to identify non-compliance with law and regulations to enquiry of the directors and other management and the inspection of regulatory and legal correspondence, if any. Material misstatements that arise due to fraud can be harder to detect than those that arise from error as they may involve deliberate concealment or collusion.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council's website at www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our Report of the Auditors.
Page 9
Page 10
Use Of Our Report
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters that we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Mr Atul Sharma (Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of The GKP Partnership , Statutory Auditor
23/04/2026
The GKP Partnership
139 Viglen House
Alperton Lane
London
Wembley
HA0 1HD
Page 10
Page 11
Income Statement
2025 2024
Notes £ £
TURNOVER 249,355 131,135
Cost of sales (217,847 ) (121,092 )
GROSS SURPLUS 31,508 10,043
Administrative expenses (31,508 ) (10,043 )
OPERATING SURPLUS AND SURPLUS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR - -
The notes on pages 13 to 14 form part of these financial statements.
Page 11
Page 12
Statement of Financial Position
2025 2024
Notes £ £ £ £
CURRENT ASSETS
Debtors 4 27,789 (1,312 )
Cash at bank and in hand 161,811 107,940
189,600 106,628
Creditors: Amounts Falling Due Within One Year 5 (189,600 ) (106,628 )
NET ASSETS - -
These accounts have been prepared in accordance with the provisions applicable to companies subject to the small companies regime.
On behalf of the board
Richard Cameron Wilson
Director
23/04/2026
The notes on pages 13 to 14 form part of these financial statements.
Page 12
Page 13
Notes to the Financial Statements
1. General Information
Reliable Media is a private company, limited by guarantee, incorporated in England & Wales, registered number 12082923 . The registered office is 3rd Floor Suite, 207 Regent Street, London, W1B 3HH.
2. Accounting Policies
2.1. Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention and in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 102 section 1A Small Entities "The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland" and the Companies Act 2006. The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention. 
2.2. Turnover
Grants and donations are recognised in the Income and Expenditure Account to the extent that the related eligible expenditure has been incurred. Income received in advance of the corresponding expenditure is treated as deferred income and presented as a liability in the Statement of Financial Position.
2.3. Financial instruments
The Company recognises financial instruments when it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets and financial liabilities are initially measured at fair value, including transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
2.4. Financial Assets
Financial assets include cash at bank and other receivables. These are held at amortised cost and reviewed for impairment at each reporting date.
2.5. Financial Liabilities
Financial liabilities include trade creditors, directors’ current accounts, accruals, and other payables. These are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost. The Company derecognises financial liabilities when the contractual obligations are discharged, cancelled, or expire.
2.6. Taxation
Taxation for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the Income Statement, except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Current or deferred taxation assets and liabilities are not discounted.
Current tax is recognised at the amount of tax payable using the tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the statement of financial position date.
2.7. Foreign currencies
Assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the rates of exchange ruling at the statement of financial position date. Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the rate of exchange ruling at the date of transaction. Exchange differences are taken into account in arriving at the operating result.
3. Average Number of Employees
Average number of employees, including directors, during the year was: NIL (2024: 2)
- 2
4. Debtors
2025 2024
£ £
Due within one year
Prepayments and accrued income 27,789 (1,312 )
Page 13
Page 14
5. Creditors: Amounts Falling Due Within One Year
2025 2024
£ £
Accruals 3,750 6,511
Accounts payable 24,181 16,913
Accruals and deferred income 161,424 82,959
Directors' loan accounts 245 245
189,600 106,628
Grants and donations that are subject to specific conditions regarding their use are recognised as deferred income when received in advance of those conditions being met. These amounts are recorded as liabilities in the Statement of Financial Position until the conditions have been fulfilled, at which point the income is recognised in the Income and Expenditure Account.
During the year, previously deferred income of £82,959 was recognised as income, while grants and donations amounting to £161,424 have been carried forward as deferred income at the reporting date.
6. Related Party Transactions
The following director has been identified as related party. Details of their declared interests are as follows:
Name: Mr. Richard Wilson Role: Director
Declared Interest
During the year, the Company made total payments amounting to £44,244 to Mr. Richard Wilson under a consultancy agreement, in respect of services provided as Community Organiser, Digital Campaigner, and Strategic Lead.
The company acknowledges this relationship and ensures that all transactions involving related party are in the best interest of the company
No other financial transactions were conducted with related party.
Page 14