We present our strategic report, together with the audited financial statements and auditor’s report, for the year ended 30 September 2025.

Clogau continues to build upon its position as a British jeweller inspired by Welsh heritage and craftsmanship. During the year the group focused on refining its collection architecture, strengthening its direct relationship with customers and maintaining disciplined operational management.

Sales increased modestly to £20,001,696 from £19,772,857 in the prior year. This represents a stabilisation following the decline experienced in the previous year and reflects encouraging growth within our direct-to-consumer channels.

Profit before taxation increased to £2,526,125 (2024: £1,470,435). The improvement in profitability reflects the absence of the one-off above-the-line advertising investment made in the prior year together with a more efficient retail footprint following the closure of three underperforming locations in 2024.

The wider economic environment continues to influence discretionary consumer spending. Despite this, the group delivered improved profitability by refining its collection architecture, strengthening operational discipline and prioritising channels where the brand maintains direct engagement with its customers.

Wholesale:

Wholesale distribution declined by 13% year on year. This reduction continues to be driven primarily by smaller independent stockists who are increasingly challenged by changing consumer expectations and the need to offer a seamless omnichannel experience.

Encouragingly, our larger strategic partners delivered stronger performance during the year. While positive, the wholesale channel continues to represent a smaller proportion of total revenue than in previous years.

Our partnership model remains an important element of the brand’s distribution strategy. We continue to prioritise relationships with carefully selected retail partners who share our commitment to brand presentation and customer experience.

Stores:

Over the past 24 months, the group has undertaken a review of its retail estate which resulted in the closure of three locations in Bristol, Conwy and Shrewsbury. The year therefore concluded with a portfolio of 12 stores.

Despite operating with fewer stores throughout the year, total store revenue remained broadly consistent with the prior year. Importantly, like-for-like performance across all remaining locations improved, with individual stores recording growth ranging from 3% to 19%.

These results demonstrate the continued strength of the brand within physical locations and confirm that a more focused retail estate can deliver improved efficiency while maintaining strong customer engagement.

Online:

Our online stores continued to perform strongly during the year and were the principal driver of overall revenue growth.

Our digital boutiques remain a key strategic priority as they allow the brand to present its collections in a controlled environment while providing a direct relationship with customers. Continued investment in this channel positions the brand well as consumer purchasing behaviour continues to evolve.

Brand Strategy:

The refinement of the brand’s collection architecture has been the most significant strategic initiative during the year.

The number of collections has been reduced from 52 in 2024 to 11 in 2025 as part of a deliberate transition toward a clearer and more recognisable portfolio of signature collections. This approach reflects the model adopted by leading luxury jewellery houses, where a smaller number of enduring collections form the foundation of the brand while offering depth of product within each range.

This simplification has delivered several benefits. Customers have not been lost as a result of the reduction in collections; instead, purchasing behaviour has become more concentrated within the brand’s most recognisable ranges. At the same time, inventory has been deployed more efficiently, with stock now concentrated across a smaller number of collections, allowing greater depth and availability within each range.

With a clearer product structure now in place, the group is able to focus its marketing efforts on positioning itself as a British jeweller with a distinctive Welsh heritage. This narrative is particularly resonating within England, where the brand sees meaningful opportunity for future growth.

The group faces several key risks including fluctuations in precious metal prices, currency movements and reduced consumer spending.

During the financial year the prices of precious metals increased significantly. Between 01 October 2024 and 30 September 2025, the gold price rose from approximately $2,660 per ounce to $3,833 per ounce, representing an increase of around 44%, while the silver price increased from approximately $31 per ounce to $46 per ounce, representing an increase of around 48%.

While these movements demonstrate the volatility inherent in precious metal markets, a significant proportion of these increases occurred towards the end of the financial year and in the period following the year end. Since 01 October 2025, gold has increased by approximately 33% and silver by approximately 80%, which may have a greater influence on trading conditions in the current financial year.

To mitigate these risks the directors maintain a proactive and disciplined approach through:

•    regular monitoring of financial and operational risks

•    ongoing review of consumer trends and customer behaviour

•    continued refinement of marketing strategy and brand positioning

Monthly directors’ meetings ensure emerging risks are identified and addressed promptly.

The primary financial KPIs for the group remain turnover, growth and adjusted EBITDA.

For the year ended 30 September 2025, turnover increased to £20,001,696 (2024: £19,772,857). Profit before taxation improved to £2,526,125 (2024: £1,470,435), reflecting improved operational efficiency and the absence of the one-off marketing investment undertaken in the prior year.

Adjusted EBITDA for the year amounted to £3.28 million compared with £2.30 million in the prior year, representing approximately 16% of turnover.

Administrative expenses also reduced during the year following the closure of three retail locations and the associated reduction in fixed operating costs.

Our principal non-financial KPI remains the size and performance of the retail estate. The group now operates a more focused portfolio of 12 stores, which has supported improved like-for-like performance.

Future developments

As we look ahead, the outlook for the group remains one of cautious optimism.

Encouraging growth is being generated through those channels that the business directly controls, particularly online boutiques and the core retail estate. At the same time, the refined collection structure provides a stronger platform for brand storytelling and product development.

Looking forward, the group will continue to focus on:

•    strengthening its direct-to-consumer channels

•    reinforcing its positioning as a British jeweller with Welsh heritage

•    expanding depth within its core collections

•    maintaining disciplined operational cost management

While the wholesale market remains challenging, the directors believe the brand’s clearer identity and simplified collection structure provide a strong foundation for sustainable long-term growth.

The directors remain focused on maintaining a strong balance sheet and disciplined cost management to ensure the business remains well positioned to navigate ongoing economic uncertainty.

As in previous years, the group remains committed to maintaining high standards of ethical conduct, workplace rights and responsible business practices across all areas of its operations.

Our people remain central to the continued development of the brand, and we are committed to providing a working environment that respects dignity, promotes equality and supports professional development. These principles are supported through our Equality, Diversity and Human Rights policies.

As a responsible jewellery brand, we recognise the importance of maintaining integrity within our supply chain. Our Human Rights and Supply Chain Policy reinforces our commitment to transparency and ethical conduct across all supplier relationships.

The group maintains a strict policy against sourcing minerals from conflict areas. Suppliers are required to comply with our Ethical Trading, Modern Slavery, Anti-bribery and Anti-corruption policies and are subject to periodic review to ensure these standards are upheld.

Our continued membership of the Responsible Jewellery Council, which we have proudly held since May 2010, reflects our long-standing commitment to responsible sourcing and ethical standards within the jewellery industry.

As in previous years, the group continues to prioritise reducing the environmental impact of its operations and supporting sustainable business practices.

Since the founding of the brand in 1986, Clogau has sought to offset its environmental footprint through initiatives such as tree planting and investment in renewable energy. These initiatives include the installation of solar panels and the development of our own hydroelectric turbine to generate renewable energy.

During the year the group also transitioned all store energy supplies to renewable electricity backed by Ofgem Renewable Energy Guarantee of Origin (REGO) certificates. Independent verification confirms that 100% of the electricity consumed across our retail locations is matched with renewable generation, equivalent to the annual electricity consumption of approximately 95 households.

Sustainability is also reflected in our packaging. All jewellery is presented in boxes produced from recycled materials which are fully recyclable, while our postal packaging is made from reclaimed materials, ensuring an environmentally responsible solution throughout the packaging process.

Through these ongoing initiatives the group continues to minimise its environmental impact while responding to the expectations of increasingly environmentally conscious customers.

On behalf of the board

The directors present their annual report and financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2025.

The principal activity of the company continued to be that of design, wholesale and retail of jewellery and associated products.

The results for the year are set out on page 10.

Ordinary dividends were paid amounting to £2,450,000. The directors do not recommend payment of a final dividend.

The directors who held office during the year and up to the date of signature of the financial statements were as follows:

Details of future developments can be found in the Strategic Report on page 2 and form part of this report by cross referencing.

In accordance with the company's articles, a resolution proposing that Champion Accountants LLP be reappointed as auditor of the company will be put at a General Meeting.

The company has chosen in accordance with Companies Act 2006, s. 414C(11) to set out in the company's strategic report information required by Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, Sch. 7 to be contained in the directors' report.

So far as each person who was a director at the date of approving this report is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the company’s auditor is unaware. Additionally, the directors individually have taken all the necessary steps that they ought to have taken as directors in order to make themselves aware of all relevant audit information and to establish that the company’s auditor is aware of that information.

The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law, the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the profit or loss of the company for that period.

In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:

• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

• make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and

• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

We have audited the financial statements of Clogau Gold of Wales Limited (the 'company') for the year ended 30 September 2025 which comprise the statement of comprehensive income, the balance sheet, the statement of changes in equity and notes to the financial statements, including significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

In our opinion the financial statements:

• give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 30 September 2025 and of its profit for the year then ended;

• have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and

• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Conclusions relating to going concern

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

Other information

The other information comprises the information included in the annual report other than the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of our audit:

• the information given in the strategic report and the directors' report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and

• the strategic report and the directors' report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report or the directors' report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:

• adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

• the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

• certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or

• we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.

As part of our planning process:

- We enquired of management the systems and controls the company has in place, the areas of the financial statements that are mostly susceptible to the risk of irregularities and fraud, and whether there was any known, suspected or alleged fraud. Management did not inform us of any known, suspected or alleged fraud.

- We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks applicable to the company. We determined that the following were most relevant: FRS 102, Companies Act 2006 and compliance with health and safety laws.

- We considered the incentives and opportunities that exist in the company, including the extent of management bias, which present a potential for irregularities and fraud to be perpetrated, and tailored our risk assessment accordingly.

- Using our knowledge of the company, together with the discussions held with management at the planning stage, we formed a conclusion on the risk of misstatement due to irregularities including fraud and tailored our procedures according to this risk assessment.

The key procedures we undertook to detect irregularities including fraud during the course of the audit included:

- Identifying and testing journal entries in overall accounting records, in particular those that were significant and unusual.

- Reviewing the financial statement disclosures and determining whether accounting policies have been appropriately applied.

- Reviewing and challenging the assumptions and judgements used by management in their significant accounting estimates.

- Assessing the extent of compliance, or lack of, with the relevant laws and regulations.

- Documenting and verifying all significant related party balances and transactions.

There are inherent limitations in our audit procedures described above. The more removed that laws and regulations are from financial transactions, the less likely it is that we would become aware of non-compliance. Auditing Standards also limit the audit procedures required to identify non-compliance with laws and regulations to enquiry of the directors and other management and the inspection of regulatory and legal correspondence, if any. Material misstatements that arise due to fraud can be harder to detect than those that arise from error as they may involve deliberate concealment or collusion.

A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor's report.

Use of our report

This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the provisions relating to medium-sized companies.

Clogau Gold of Wales Limited is a private company limited by shares incorporated in England and Wales. The registered office is Number 5 Kinmel Park, Abergele Road, Bodelwyddan, Rhyl, Denbighshire, LL18 5TX.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with FRS 102 “The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland” (“FRS 102”) and the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

The financial statements are prepared in sterling, which is the functional currency of the company. Monetary amounts in these financial statements are rounded to the nearest £.

The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, modified to include the revaluation of freehold properties and to include investment properties and certain financial instruments at fair value. The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below.

This company is a qualifying entity for the purposes of FRS 102, being a member of a group where the parent of that group prepares publicly available consolidated financial statements, including this company, which are intended to give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the group. The company has therefore taken advantage of exemptions from the following disclosure requirements:

• Section 7 ‘Statement of Cash Flows’: Presentation of a statement of cash flow and related notes and disclosures;

• Section 11 ‘Basic Financial Instruments’ and Section 12 ‘Other Financial Instrument Issues’: Interest income/expense and net gains/losses for each category of financial instrument; basis of determining fair values; details of collateral, loan defaults or breaches, details of hedges, hedging fair value changes recognised in profit or loss and in other comprehensive income;

• Section 33 ‘Related Party Disclosures’: Compensation for key management personnel.

The financial statements of the company are consolidated in the financial statements of Clogau Holdings Limited. These consolidated financial statements are available from its registered office, 5 Kinmel Park, Abergele Road, Bodelwyddan, Rhyl, Denbighshire, LL18 5TX.

The company has taken advantage of the exemption under section 400 of the Companies Act 2006 not to prepare consolidated accounts. The financial statements present information about the company as an individual entity and not about its group.

Atruet the time of approving the financial statements, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Thus the directors continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements.

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to the buyer (usually on dispatch of the goods), the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity and the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

Intangible assets acquired separately from a business are recognised at cost and are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.

Amortisation is recognised so as to write off the cost or valuation of assets less their residual values over their useful lives on the following bases:

Tangible fixed assets are initially measured at cost and subsequently measured at cost or valuation, net of depreciation and any impairment losses.

Depreciation is recognised so as to write off the cost or valuation of assets less their residual values over their useful lives on the following bases:

The gain or loss arising on the disposal of an asset is determined as the difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying value of the asset, and is credited or charged to profit or loss.

Freehold land and buildings are held at fair value following a revaluation in September 2022. The directors consider the valuation each year and will adjust for any material change. On that basis these assets are not depreciated.

Stocks are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is calculated using the FIFO (first-in, first-out) method. Cost includes materials and other costs directly associated with bringing it to its present condition and location. Net realisable value is based on estimated selling price, less further costs expected to be incurred to completion and disposal. Provision is made for obsolete, slow-moving or defective items where appropriate.

Cash and cash equivalents are basic financial assets and include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities.

The company has elected to apply the provisions of Section 11 ‘Basic Financial Instruments’ and Section 12 ‘Other Financial Instruments Issues’ of FRS 102 to all of its financial instruments.

Financial instruments are recognised in the company's balance sheet when the company becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

Financial assets and liabilities are offset, with the net amounts presented in the financial statements, when there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

Basic financial assets, which include debtors and cash and bank balances, are initially measured at transaction price including transaction costs and are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method unless the arrangement constitutes a financing transaction, where the transaction is measured at the present value of the future receipts discounted at a market rate of interest. Financial assets classified as receivable within one year are not amortised.

Other financial assets, including investments in equity instruments which are not subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures, are initially measured at fair value, which is normally the transaction price. Such assets are subsequently carried at fair value and the changes in fair value are recognised in profit or loss, except that investments in equity instruments that are not publicly traded and whose fair values cannot be measured reliably are measured at cost less impairment.

Financial assets, other than those held at fair value through profit and loss, are assessed for indicators of impairment at each reporting end date.

Financial assets are impaired where there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset, the estimated future cash flows have been affected. If an asset is impaired, the impairment loss is the difference between the carrying amount and the present value of the estimated cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. The impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss.

If there is a decrease in the impairment loss arising from an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the impairment is reversed. The reversal is such that the current carrying amount does not exceed what the carrying amount would have been, had the impairment not previously been recognised. The impairment reversal is recognised in profit or loss.

Financial assets are derecognised only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or are settled, or when the company transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to another entity, or if some significant risks and rewards of ownership are retained but control of the asset has transferred to another party that is able to sell the asset in its entirety to an unrelated third party.

Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the company after deducting all of its liabilities.

Basic financial liabilities, including creditors, bank loans, loans from fellow group companies and preference shares that are classified as debt, are initially recognised at transaction price unless the arrangement constitutes a financing transaction, where the debt instrument is measured at the present value of the future payments discounted at a market rate of interest. Financial liabilities classified as payable within one year are not amortised.

Debt instruments are subsequently carried at amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method.

Trade creditors are obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business from suppliers. Amounts payable are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less. If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities. Trade creditors are recognised initially at transaction price and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

Derivatives, including interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts, are not basic financial instruments. Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognised in profit or loss in finance costs or finance income as appropriate, unless hedge accounting is applied and the hedge is a cash flow hedge.

Debt instruments that do not meet the conditions in FRS 102 paragraph 11.9 are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. Debt instruments may be designated as being measured at fair value through profit or loss to eliminate or reduce an accounting mismatch or if the instruments are measured and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy.

Financial liabilities are derecognised when the company’s contractual obligations expire or are discharged or cancelled.

Equity instruments issued by the company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of transaction costs. Dividends payable on equity instruments are recognised as liabilities once they are no longer at the discretion of the company.

The company enters into foreign exchange option contracts in order to manage its exposure to foreign exchange risk.

Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value at the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured to fair value at each reporting end date. The resulting gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss immediately unless the derivative is designated and effective as a hedging instrument, in which event the timing of the recognition in profit or loss depends on the nature of the hedge relationship.

A derivative with a positive fair value is recognised as a financial asset, whereas a derivative with a negative fair value is recognised as a financial liability.

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.

The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the profit and loss account because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The company’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting end date.

Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all timing differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that they will be recovered against the reversal of deferred tax liabilities or other future taxable profits. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if the timing difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the tax profit nor the accounting profit.

Provisions are recognised when the company has a legal or constructive present obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that the company will be required to settle that obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.

The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the reporting end date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount expected to be required to settle the obligation is recognised at present value. When a provision is measured at present value, the unwinding of the discount is recognised as a finance cost in profit or loss in the period in which it arises.

The costs of short-term employee benefits are recognised as a liability and an expense, unless those costs are required to be recognised as part of the cost of stock or fixed assets.

The cost of any unused holiday entitlement is recognised in the period in which the employee’s services are received.

Termination benefits are recognised immediately as an expense when the company is demonstrably committed to terminate the employment of an employee or to provide termination benefits.

Payments to defined contribution retirement benefit schemes are charged as an expense as they fall due.

Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessees. All other leases are classified as operating leases.

Assets held under finance leases are recognised as assets at the lower of the assets fair value at the date of inception and the present value of the minimum lease payments. The related liability is included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments are treated as consisting of capital and interest elements. The interest is charged to profit or loss so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.

Rentals payable under operating leases, including any lease incentives received, are charged to profit or loss on a straight line basis over the term of the relevant lease except where another more systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leases asset are consumed.

Transactions in currencies other than pounds sterling are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. At each reporting end date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing on the reporting end date. Gains and losses arising on translation in the period are included in profit or loss.

In the application of the company’s accounting policies, the directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised where the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods where the revision affects both current and future periods.

The following judgements (apart from those involving estimates) have had the most significant effect on amounts recognised in the financial statements.

Investment properties are measured at fair value by an external valuer every five years with any change recognised in the profit and loss account. At 26 August 2022, the directors obtained a valuation of the property from an independent land and estate agent. This valuation was carried out by a local estate and land agent with good knowledge and experience of the local market.

Stock is reviewed on an ongoing basis and a specific provision is calculated in relation to individual stock items to provide against exposure to foreign exchange variations and gold prices. As at the year end the directors have no material concerns over the recoverability of the company’s stock, this is because the company has many distribution channels to sell stock and can ultimately recover the metal value from stock after exhausting each option.

The average monthly number of persons (including directors) employed by the company during the year was:

Their aggregate remuneration comprised:

The number of directors for whom retirement benefits are accruing under defined contribution schemes amounted to 1 (2024 - 1).

The actual charge for the year can be reconciled to the expected charge for the year based on the profit or loss and the standard rate of tax as follows:

Freehold buildings were revalued to £1,320,000 on 16 September 2022 by Legat Owen Chartered Surveyors, independent valuers not connected with the company, on the basis of market value. The valuation conforms to International Valuation Standards and was based on recent market transactions on arm's length terms for similar properties.

As at the balance sheet date, the directors have reviewed the fair value of the buildings and consider that no material change has occurred since the last professional valuation.

Freehold land and buildings are carried at valuation. If land and buildings were measured using the cost model, the carrying amounts would have been £434,579 (2024 - £434,579), being cost £434,579 and depreciation £nil.

Details of the company's subsidiaries at 30 September 2025 are as follows:

Registered office addresses (all UK unless otherwise indicated):

There is no material difference between the balance sheet value of stocks and it's replacement cost.

Finance lease payments represent rentals payable by the company for certain items of plant and machinery. Leases include purchase options at the end of the lease period, and no restrictions are placed on the use of the assets. The average lease term is 2 years. All leases are on a fixed repayment basis and no arrangements have been entered into for contingent rental payments.

The store dilapidation provision represents any future costs associated with the closure of stores if and when it is reasonably probable a lease is not renewed.

The following are the major deferred tax liabilities and assets recognised by the company and movements thereon:

The company operates a defined contribution pension scheme for all qualifying employees. The assets of the scheme are held separately from those of the company in an independently administered fund.

At the reporting end date the company had outstanding commitments for future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases, which fall due as follows:

Included in operating lease commitments are land and building leases totalling £1,529,423 (2024 - £1,746,525).

The above balances have been included in debtors and creditors falling due within one year where applicable. The balances were repayable on demand and did not attract interest.

The parent company is Clogau Holdings Limited who own 100% of the shares in Clogau Gold of Wales Limited.

The largest and smallest group in which the results of the company are consolidated is that headed by the ultimate parent company Clogau Holdings Limited. Registered address for Clogau Holdings Limited is 5 Kinmel Park, Abergele Road, Bodelwyddan, Rhyl, Denbighshire, LL18 5TX. The consolidated financial statements of the group are available to the public and may be obtained from Companies House.

By virtue of his beneficial shareholding in Clogau Holdings Limited, Mr W S Roberts is the ultimate controlling party of Clogau Gold of Wales Limited.