The directors present the strategic report for the year ended 31 December 2025.

The company’s principal activity remained the provision of bespoke patient rehabilitation services to the insurance industry and legal sectors.

The profit and loss account shows that the company achieved a turnover of £17,311,026 an increase of 12% in the year compared to previous period result of £15,447,330 (restated).

The increase in turnover and operating profit was driven by continued growth in revenue resulting from current customer contracts in addition to new contracts being secured.

During the prior year, the group and company refinanced which improved the credit facility and the terms. The increase in revenue during the year has resulted in an increase in trade debtors due to the long-term credit offered to customers, resulting in an increase in interest payable.

Overall, the directors are pleased with the performance of the business during the year, along with the financial position of the company as shown on the balance sheet, where net assets have increased to £5,531,486 from the prior period of £4,237,872.

Key performance indicators are disclosed on page 2.

The directors have undertaken a comprehensive review of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the company and consider that appropriate measures have been implemented to manage and mitigate these risks. Ongoing monitoring and governance processes are in place to ensure that emerging risks are identified and addressed in a timely manner, supporting the continued resilience and stability of the business.

Legislative risk

Part of the industry in which the company operates is overseen by the Ministry of Justice, therefore it monitors the industry for updates and key market trends. Although future changes could adversely affect the company, since the legislation was introduced the company has continued to increase its share of cases being processed.

To mitigate the risk above, the company continues to enhance its offering and develop service lines to other claim types and end users.

Credit and cashflow risk

The company’s principal assets are trade debtors. The company offers extended credit terms to many customers, typically exceeding two years because of the time required to settle the underlying claims. This results in a significant level of working capital being absorbed by the business.

This risk is mitigated through regular reconciliation of customer balances, prompt issue of credit notes, and ongoing monitoring of customer payment values and profiles.

Liquidity risk

The company monitors its short and medium-term cash requirements to ensure it has sufficient funds to meet liabilities as they fall due. This is supported by invoice discounting facilities which provide funding for working capital requirements.

The company is actively seeking to improve the balance between short and long-term credit terms and continues to explore opportunities to reduce overall debtor days.

Interest risk

The company is financed through an invoice discounting facility, as disclosed under loans and overdrafts. The facility is subject to interest at a margin above Bank of England base rate, exposing the company to the risk of future rate increases.

Competitive risk

The company operates in a highly competitive market with several alternative providers. It remains focused on delivering a market-leading service at a competitive price. Customer contracts generally extend beyond two years and are regularly reviewed to ensure that both relationship quality and commercial terms remain competitive and represent strong value in the market.

The company intends to continue increasing its share of physiotherapy and CBT cases, while continuing to explore adjacent markets where its services can be delivered with lower working capital requirements.

With the support of the group, the company expects to secure further business from competitors by maintaining its high-quality service offering.

In all cases these KPIs have been calculated on a consistent basis with the 2025 figures and are based directly on the amounts shown in the financial statements.

Shareholders and Long-Term Success

The directors continually assess the company’s strategic direction and financial performance to ensure the business remains sustainable and financially resilient. Throughout 2025, the board focused on maintaining a strong balance sheet, prudent cash management and investment in growth opportunities that support the company’s long-term objectives. Significant strategic decisions were evaluated based on their anticipated long-term impact on profitability, cash generation, operational resilience and shareholder value.

Employees

The company's employees are fundamental to delivering high-quality services to customers and clients. The directors receive regular updates on employee matters, including recruitment, retention, training, wellbeing and engagement. During the year, investment continued in leadership development, operational capability and systems improvements designed to support employees in performing their roles effectively. The board remains committed to maintaining an inclusive and supportive working environment that enables colleagues to develop professionally whilst contributing to the success of the company.

Customers and Business Relationships

Maintaining strong relationships with customers, medical professionals, rehabilitation providers, legal firms, insurers and other key stakeholders remains central to the company's strategy. The directors regularly review customer service performance, operational metrics and market developments to ensure the company continues to deliver high-quality services and innovative solutions. Strategic decisions are assessed with consideration for customer outcomes, service quality and the long-term sustainability of customer relationships.

Suppliers and Partners

The company relies upon a network of independent treatment providers to support its operations. The directors recognise the importance of fair and responsible business practices and seek to maintain constructive relationships with suppliers through transparent communication and timely settlement of obligations. Key supplier relationships are reviewed regularly to ensure that service quality, commercial arrangements and operational resilience continue to support the company's objectives.

Impact on Communities and the Environment

Whilst the company's activities have a relatively limited environmental impact compared to many industries, the directors remain committed to operating responsibly and seeking opportunities to improve efficiency and reduce waste. The board considers the wider social impact of the services provided by the company, particularly in supporting access to healthcare, rehabilitation and medico-legal services for individuals across the United Kingdom.

High Standards of Business Conduct

The directors promote a culture of integrity, accountability and professionalism across the company. Compliance with applicable laws, regulations and industry standards remains a core component of the company and group's governance framework. The board receives regular updates on regulatory developments, risk management, information security, financial controls and compliance matters to ensure that the company maintains high standards of business conduct and corporate governance.

Fairness Between Members

The directors seek to act fairly between all members of the company and carefully consider the impact of decisions on shareholders collectively. Decisions regarding investment, financing, distributions and strategic initiatives are taken with a view to balancing the interests of shareholders with the long-term sustainability and success of the business.

On behalf of the board

The directors present their annual report and financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2025.

The principal activity of the company is that of bespoke patient rehabilitation services.

The company is wholly owned subsidiary of Kuro Health Limited.

The results for the year are set out on page 10.

No ordinary dividends were paid. The directors do not recommend payment of a final dividend.

The directors who held office during the year and up to the date of signature of the financial statements were as follows:

The auditor, Price Bailey LLP, is deemed to be reappointed under section 487(2) of the Companies Act 2006.

So far as each person who was a director at the date of approving this report is aware, there is no relevant audit information, being information needed by the auditor on connection with preparing its report, of which the auditor is unaware. Having made enquiries of fellow directors and the group's auditor, each director has taken all the steps that he / she is obliged to take as a director in order to make himself / herself aware of any relevant audit information, and to establish that the auditor is aware of that information.

After considering the company's forecast for the next 12 months, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the company has adequate cash and resources to meet all requirements to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. The directors have also received confirmation that the parent company will continue to provide support where necessary.  Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the annual report and accounts.

In the current year, the FRS 102 Periodic Review 2024 was applied by the company for the first time.

The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the profit or loss of the company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:

• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

• make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law, the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the profit or loss of the company for that period.

In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:

• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

• make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and

• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

We have audited the financial statements of Rehab-Link Limited (the ‘company’) for the year ended 31 December 2025 which comprise Profit and Loss Account, Balance Sheet, Statement of Changes in Equity and related notes to the financial statements, including significant accounting policies.  The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

In our opinion the financial statements:

• give a true and fair view of the state of the Company's affairs as at 31 December 2025 and of its profit or loss for the year then ended;

• have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and

• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the United Kingdom, including the Financial Reporting Council's Ethical Standard, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Conclusions relating to going concern

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

 Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

Other information

The other information comprises the information included in the annual report, other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:

• the information given in the Strategic Report and the Directors' Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and

• the Strategic Report and the Directors' Report has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the Strategic Report and the Directors' Report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:

• adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

• the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

• certain disclosures of Directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or

• we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit

As explained more fully in the Directors' Responsibilities Statement, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an Auditor's Report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:

We gained an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the Company and the industry in which it operates and considered the risk of the Company not complying with the applicable laws and regulations including fraud in particular those that could have a material impact on the financial statements. This included those regulations directly related to the financial statements, including financial reporting, tax legislation and distributable profits. The risks were discussed with the audit team and we remained alert to any indications of non-compliance throughout the audit.

We carried out specific procedures to address the risks identified. These included the following:

• A review of legal fees incurred;

• Reviewing minutes of meetings of those charged with governance;

• Enquiring of management including those responsible for the key regulations;

• Reviewing the key accounting policies and estimates; and

• Agreeing the financial statement disclosures to underlying supporting documentation

To address the risk of management override of controls, we carried out a review of journal entries and other adjustments for appropriateness. We reviewed systems and procedures to identify potential areas of management override risk. In particular, we carried out a review of journal entries and other adjustments for appropriateness, and evaluating the business rationale of significant transactions to identify large or unusual transactions. We reviewed key authorisation procedures and decision-making processes for any unusual or one-off transactions. We also assessed management bias in relation to the accounting policies adopted and in determining significant accounting estimates.

Due to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is a risk that we will not detect all irregularities, including those leading to a material misstatement in the financial statements or non-compliance with regulation. This risk increases the more that compliance with a law or regulation is removed from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, as we will be less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance. The risk is also greater regarding irregularities occurring due to fraud rather than error, as fraud involves intentional concealment, forgery, collusion, omission or misrepresentation.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council's website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our Auditor's Report.

Use of our report

This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume any responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members, as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or the opinions we have formed.

The profit and loss account has been prepared on the basis that all operations are continuing operations.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the provisions relating to medium-sized companies.

Rehab-Link Limited is a private company limited by shares incorporated in England and Wales. The registered office is Palatine House, Belmont Business Park, Durham, DH1 1TW.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with FRS 102 “The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland” (“FRS 102”) and the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

The financial statements are prepared in sterling, which is the functional currency of the company. Monetary amounts in these financial statements are rounded to the nearest £.

The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, and in accordance with applicable accounting standards. The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below.

This company is a qualifying entity for the purposes of FRS 102, being a member of a group where the parent of that group prepares publicly available consolidated financial statements, including this company, which are intended to give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the group. The company has therefore taken advantage of exemptions from the following disclosure requirements:

• Section 7 ‘Statement of Cash Flows’

• Section 33 ‘Related Party Disclosures’

The financial statements of the company are consolidated in the financial statements of Kuro Health Limited. These consolidated financial statements are available from its registered office, 4th Floor, Park Gate, 161-163 Preston Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 6AF.

The company has early adopted the Amendments to FRS 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland and other FRSs Periodic Review 2024 (FRS 102 periodic review amendments 2024) contained within FRS 102 (2024) which, if not early adopted, are applicable for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026.

After considering the company's forecast for the next 12 months, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the company has adequate cash and resources to meet all requirements to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. The directors have also received confirmation that the parent company will continue to provide support where necessary.  Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the annual report and accounts.true

Revenue from the sale of services to customers is recognised by applying the five-step model, which is designed to represent the transfer of promised services to customers. The amount recognised reflects the consideration the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those services, being discounted to present value.

The company enters into contracts with customers in the medical legal sector to provide treatment and rehabilitation services to injured individuals. Each instruction received contains a single performance obligation to deliver one distinct service.

Because the customer receives benefit from the services throughout the course of treatment, revenue is recognised as treatment sessions are attended.

Invoices are issued at the point the service complete following discharged by the treatment provider, and are recorded as turnover. At the balance sheet date, the company accrues for turnover in respect of services performed but un-invoiced, accrued income is included within other debtors.

Any associated expected costs of services provided are accrued and included in other creditors. At the point of the invoice the company provides for likely credit notes.

Revenue for each contract is recognised using an output method based on treatment completion. Progress toward complete satisfaction of the performance obligation is measured directly by the completion and discharge of the individual from treatment services.

This method provides a faithful depiction of the transfer of services because the individual derives economic benefit from the service over the course of the treatment. Consequently, 100% of the transaction price allocated to the report is recognised as revenue at the point of final discharge.

Tangible fixed assets are initially measured at cost and subsequently measured at cost or valuation, net of depreciation and any impairment losses.

Depreciation is recognised so as to write off the cost or valuation of assets less their residual values over their useful lives on the following bases:

The gain or loss arising on the disposal of an asset is determined as the difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying value of the asset, and is credited or charged to profit or loss.

At each reporting period end date, the company reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease.

Recognised impairment losses are reversed if, and only if, the reasons for the impairment loss have ceased to apply. Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.

Cash and cash equivalents are basic financial assets and include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities.

The company has elected to apply the provisions of Section 11 ‘Basic Financial Instruments’ and Section 12 ‘Other Financial Instruments Issues’ of FRS 102 to all of its financial instruments.

Financial instruments are recognised in the company's balance sheet when the company becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

Basic financial assets, which include debtors and cash and bank balances, are initially measured at transaction price including transaction costs and are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method unless the arrangement constitutes a financing transaction, where the transaction is measured at the present value of the future receipts discounted at a market rate of interest. Financial assets classified as receivable within one year are not amortised.

Other financial assets, including investments in equity instruments which are not subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures, are initially measured at fair value, which is normally the transaction price. Such assets are subsequently carried at fair value and the changes in fair value are recognised in profit or loss, except that investments in equity instruments that are not publicly traded and whose fair values cannot be measured reliably are measured at cost less impairment.

Financial assets, other than those held at fair value through profit and loss, are assessed for indicators of impairment at each reporting end date.

Financial assets are impaired where there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset, the estimated future cash flows have been affected. If an asset is impaired, the impairment loss is the difference between the carrying amount and the present value of the estimated cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. The impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss.

If there is a decrease in the impairment loss arising from an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the impairment is reversed. The reversal is such that the current carrying amount does not exceed what the carrying amount would have been, had the impairment not previously been recognised. The impairment reversal is recognised in profit or loss.

Financial assets are derecognised only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or are settled, or when the company transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to another entity, or if some significant risks and rewards of ownership are retained but control of the asset has transferred to another party that is able to sell the asset in its entirety to an unrelated third party.

Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the company after deducting all of its liabilities.

Basic financial liabilities, including creditors, bank loans, loans from fellow group companies and preference shares that are classified as debt, are initially recognised at transaction price unless the arrangement constitutes a financing transaction, where the debt instrument is measured at the present value of the future payments discounted at a market rate of interest. Financial liabilities classified as payable within one year are not amortised.

Debt instruments are subsequently carried at amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method.

Trade creditors are obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business from suppliers. Amounts payable are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less. If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities. Trade creditors are recognised initially at transaction price and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

Derivatives, including interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts, are not basic financial instruments. Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognised in profit or loss in finance costs or finance income as appropriate, unless hedge accounting is applied and the hedge is a cash flow hedge.

Debt instruments that do not meet the conditions in FRS 102 paragraph 11.9 are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. Debt instruments may be designated as being measured at fair value through profit or loss to eliminate or reduce an accounting mismatch or if the instruments are measured and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy.

Financial liabilities are derecognised when the company’s contractual obligations expire or are discharged or cancelled.

Equity instruments issued by the company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of transaction costs. Dividends payable on equity instruments are recognised as liabilities once they are no longer at the discretion of the company.

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.

The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the profit and loss account because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The company’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting end date.

Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all timing differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that they will be recovered against the reversal of deferred tax liabilities or other future taxable profits. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if the timing difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the tax profit nor the accounting profit.

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting end date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the profit and loss account, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when the company has a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority.

Provisions are recognised when the company has a legal or constructive present obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that the company will be required to settle that obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.

The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the reporting end date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount expected to be required to settle the obligation is recognised at present value. When a provision is measured at present value, the unwinding of the discount is recognised as a finance cost in profit or loss in the period in which it arises.

The costs of short-term employee benefits are recognised as a liability and an expense, unless those costs are required to be recognised as part of the cost of stock or fixed assets.

The cost of any unused holiday entitlement is recognised in the period in which the employee’s services are received.

Termination benefits are recognised immediately as an expense when the company is demonstrably committed to terminate the employment of an employee or to provide termination benefits.

The company operates a defined contribution pension scheme for all qualifying employees. The assets of the scheme are held separately from those of the company in an independently administered fund. Payments to the defined contribution scheme are charged as an expense as they fall due.

At inception, the company assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. A lease arises where the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Control of the use of an asset occurs where the company has both the right to direct the use of the asset, and the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from that use.

Where a tangible asset is acquired through a lease, the company recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date. Right-of-use assets are included within the same line items on the Balance sheet as owned assets.

The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial measurement of the lease liability adjusted for lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives or grants received, plus initial direct costs and an estimate of the cost of obligations to dismantle, remove or restore the underlying asset and the site on which it is located.

The right-of-use asset is subsequently adjusted for remeasurements of the lease liability and applies the relevant cost model, fair value model or revaluation model as set out within the accounting policies for the applicable asset class. Where the cost model is applied, the asset is depreciated from the commencement date to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term, and is periodically reduced by impairment losses, if any.

The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are unpaid at the commencement date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the company's incremental borrowing rate or the company’s obtainable borrowing rate. Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise fixed payments less any lease incentives receivable, variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, amounts expected to be payable under residual value guarantees, the exercise price of any purchase options that the company is reasonably certain to exercise, and any penalties for early termination of a lease.

At each financial period end, the lease liability is adjusted to reflect payments made and interest accrued. Also, the lease liability is remeasured to reflect lease modifications and any changes to the factors considered at initial measurement, as set out above. When the lease liability is remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset, or recognised in profit or loss if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has been reduced to zero.

In the comparative period, the company classified leases as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessees. All other leases were classified as operating leases. Assets held under finance leases were recognised as assets at the lower of the assets' fair value at the date of inception and the present value of the minimum lease payments. The related liability was included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments were treated as consisting of capital and interest elements and the interest was charged to profit or loss so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Rentals payable under operating leases, less any lease incentives received, were charged to profit or loss on a straight line basis over the term of the relevant lease except where another more systematic basis was more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased asset were consumed.

In the current year, the FRS 102 Periodic Review 2024 was applied by the company for the first time and affects the financial statements as follows.

The company has applied the FRS 102 Periodic Review 2024 amendments to Section 20 Leases.

There is no material financial impact of the company resulting from the application of the revised lease accounting policy on the adoption of the FRS 102 periodic review amendments 2024.

The company’s revised accounting policies for leases are set out in note 1.

The company has applied the FRS 102 Periodic Review 2024 amendments to Section 23 Revenue for the first time using the fully retrospective approach and has therefore restated the comparative financial information with effect from the beginning of the preceding accounting period.

The company’s revised accounting policies for revenue are set out in note 1 and the adjustment for each current period financial statement line item affected by the application of the Periodic Review 2024 is set out below. Retrospective adjustments for the application of the Periodic Review 2024 are set out in note 19.

The company has taken advantage of the following practical expedients permitted when applying the Periodic Review 2024:

• For completed contracts that have variable consideration, the transaction price used is that applying at the date the contract was completed.

• Contracts that were modified before the date of initial application have not been retrospectively restated for the contract modifications. Instead, the aggregate effect of the modifications has been applied when identifying the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, determining the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations.

• Completed contracts have not been restated if they begin and end within the same annual reporting period or had been completed at the beginning of the earliest period presented.

• For prior periods presented, the company has not provided a quantitative or qualitative explanation of the significance of unsatisfied performance obligations and when they are expected to be satisfied.

In the application of the company’s accounting policies, the directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised where the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods where the revision affects both current and future periods.

The estimates and assumptions which have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities are as follows.

Revenue from services is recognised in accordance with the policy set out at 1.3. While cases typically complete within two years, there are instances where cases are unsuccessful, and fees are not recoverable. As a consequence, significant judgment is required to account for potential unsuccessful cases.

A prudent provision for credit notes is made, to estimate the potential impact of case profiles and the respective incomes. The provision is calculated based on extensive historical experience, up-to-date information on current market trends, utilising industry knowledge, and other relevant factors. Any such assumptions are by their nature subjective, and if actual outcomes differ from these assumptions, it could give rise to a materially different financial outcome.

The provision is calculated as a percentage of invoiced revenue in a calendar year. Therefore, should the provision be over or understated by 1%, the impact in the financial statements based on 2025 turnover would be £162,231 (2024: £138,152).  Given the long credit offer to customers (see KPIs), the percentages applied in prior years are reviewed annually, and estimates are adjusted accordingly in line with actual trading performance until all invoices raised have been collected. As some cases settle over a longer period, the impact of a 1% change in provision could be compounded by the number of years taken for cases to settle, meaning the cumulative impact of changes in underlying trends on this provision could be significant over time.

Therefore, the financial results of the company are sensitive to movements in this provision if underlying trends change. However, the senior management team believes they have adequate and robust controls and key performance indicators (KPIs) in place to continually monitor and assess the suitability of the provision, and that it is fairly stated in the financial statements based on all available evidence at the year-end. The directors are confident that the credit note provision reflects a reasonable and prudent estimate given the inherent uncertainty.

Management exercises judgement in determining whether contracts with customers include a significant financing component under FRS 102 Section 23, based on the timing between transfer of services, payment and the commercial terms of the arrangement.

Future base rate changes could affect the net present value of revenue and may potentially have an impact on the company.

From re-running the model used to discount turnover to present value, with a percentage change of 1% or 2%, the interest element would be immaterial.

The discount rate applied for 2025 is 6.5% (2024: 7.5%).

Changes in assumptions could have a material impact on trade receivables and revenue recognition.

The whole of the turnover is attributable to the principal activity of the company, and wholly undertaken in the United Kingdom.

Revenue recognised from contracts with customers is shown below as Turnover - gross less Present value adjustment: £16,805,425 (2024 restated: £14,688,793).

Turnover is calculated as below:

To comply with FRS102 (Section 23) Periodic Review 2024 amendments

Where payment for goods or services is deferred beyond normal business credit terms (typically more than 12 months), the arrangement is considered to include a significant financing component.

In such cases, revenue is recognised at the present value of future cash flows, discounted using an appropriate market rate of interest.

The difference between the nominal value of the consideration and its present value (the financing element) has been recognised within turnover. It has been recognised as a present value adjustment over the period of deferral using the effective interest method.

Trade receivables are initially recognised at their present value. The discount is subsequently unwound, increasing the carrying value of the receivable, with the unwinding recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss as a unwinding present value adjustment within turnover.

There is an assumption regarding the timing of the payments based on historic performance, amounts expected within the first 12 months post period end, these amount's should not be discounted as there is deemed to be no significant financing component.

Discounting of the receivables should begin after 12 months.

The average monthly number of persons (including directors) employed by the company during the year was:

Their aggregate remuneration comprised:

The actual charge for the year can be reconciled to the expected charge/(credit) for the year based on the profit or loss and the standard rate of tax as follows:

The industry in which the company operates offers customers credit terms which reflect the time cases can potentially take to settle, which can exceed 12 months.  These credit terms are normal for companies operating in this sector.

The classification of the amounts falling due after more than one year is based on management's best estimates of the expected settlement dates.

Included in creditors due within one year are amounts due to group undertakings. The loans are interest free and repayable on demand.

The group has access to an invoice discount facility of £20,000,000 of which £5,000,000 is assigned to the company.

As at 31 December 2025 the outstanding balance due to RBS Invoice Finance Limited in respect of the invoice discount facility was £2,489,398 (2024: £902,365). This balance is included in creditors due within one year.

As at the 31 December 2025 the group was utilising £14,525,799 (2024: £14,426,614) of the £20,000,000 credit facility, see note 16.

The facilities are secured by a fixed and floating charges over current and future assets of the company.

The following are the major deferred tax liabilities and assets recognised by the company:

The cross guarantee is in support of the finance facilities provided to the Kuro Health group of entities. The cross guarantee includes the following group companies: Premier Medical Group Limited, Rehab-Link Limited and Mobile Doctors Limited. The balance owed to RBS Invoice Finance Ltd at 31 December 2025 was £14,525,799 (31 December 2024: £14,426,614).

The company received amounts from Folkington Finance Limited totalling £171,715 (2024: £459,069) a company associated to various directors.

No details are included for transactions with fellow group subsidiaries that are 100% owned as the exemption for such companies is being claimed.

The company's ultimate parent company is Kuro Health Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales. The financial statements of Kuro Health Limited are available from the registered office at 4th Floor, Park Gate 161-163 Preston Road, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom, BN1 6AF.