Financial Reporting Council Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended
31 March 2026
31 March 2026
Financial Reporting Council Limited
Company number 02486368
Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
From the period
1 April 2025
01 April 2025
to 31 March 2026
Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Business and Trade by Command of His Majesty
July 2026
© Financial Reporting Council copyright 2026
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at
Financial Reporting Council Limited, 13th Floor, 1 Harbour Exchange Square, London, E14 9GE or frccommunications@frc.org.uk
ISBN 978-1-5286-6337-3 E03570234
07/25
Printed on paper containing 40% recycled fibre content minimum
Printed in the UK by HH Associates Ltd. on behalf of the Controller of His Majesty's Stationery Office
Contents
49
6
Governance
Strategic Reporttrue
47
25
6
14. Chair's introduction
1. 2025/26 highlights
48
15. Governance and transparency framework
8
2. Statement by the Chair
49
9
3. The FRC at a glance
16. Our Board and committees
51
10
4. Our business model
17. Our Executive Committee
61
13
5. Chief Executive's report
18. Conduct Committee report
65
6. Operational Performance Measures
20
19. Audit & Risk Committee report
67
22
7. Our people and culture framework
20. People Committee report
70
25
8. Section 172 and stakeholder engagement
21. Remuneration report
72
22. Remuneration framework: pay multiples and director remuneration
28
9. Environmental impacts and ESGtrue
74
31
10. Compliance
23. Directors' reporttrue
78
34
11. Managing complaints to the FRC
Financial Statementstrue
82
38
12. Financial review
24. Independent Auditor's report to the members of The Financial Reporting Council Limited and the Houses oftrue
40
13. Risk management
Parliament
83
91
25. Financial Statements
26. Notes to the Financial Statements
95
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
5
1.
2025/26 highlights
April
May
Observations from the pilot phase of the Actuarial Monitoring Programme issued
Final report from the NHS Audit Market Study published
Structured digital reporting – 2024/25 insights published
Final report on the Company and Organisational Data Explorer project published
June
July
Publication of the UK Stewardship Code 2026
Annual audit firm inspection results
Emerging findings from the Small and Medium Entities Audit Market Study
Landmark guidance on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in audit and thematic review
Annual Enforcement Review published
August
Signatories to UK Stewardship Code 2020 announced
of certification of automated tools and techniques published
September
Launch of Building Capacity for Smaller Firms programme
Launch of the Innovation & Improvement Hub
Annual Review of Corporate Reporting published
October
Announcement of the appointment of Anthony Barrett as Executive Director of Supervision, and Penrose Foss as Executive Director of Investigations & Enforcement
Key Facts & Trends report published
Audit Quality Review key findings and good practice report published
Withdrawal of Actuarial Statement of Recommended Practice 1 to streamline actuarial standards framework
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
6
November
Publication of thematic review of reporting by the UK's smaller listed companies
Annual Review of Corporate Governance Reporting published
Issuance of International Standard on Sustainability Assurance (UK) 5000, General Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements
December
Publication of first reporting insights of the Wates Principles for large private companies
January
Annual Audit
Final list of successful signatories to the UK Stewardship Code 2020 published
Market & Competition Update published
Guidance to support actuaries dealing with historic amendments to pension rules published
February
Updated guidance on the strategic report issued
March
Announcement of Sir Jan du Plessis' upcoming retirement in September 2026
SME audit market study final report and SME practice note issued
Launch of our revised audit supervision approach
AI guidance for audit firms on using generative and agentic AI tools in audit engagements published
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
7
2.
Statement by the Chair
I am pleased to present the Financial Reporting Council's (FRC's) 2025/26 Annual Report and Accounts. Our core purpose has remained serving the public interest and supporting UK economic growth by upholding high standards of corporate governance, corporate reporting, audit and actuarial work.
Our core activities, namely standard-setting, supervision and enforcement, remain the foundation of how we support investor and stakeholder confidence.
While this has been my last full year at the FRC, following my decision to retire as of September 2026, I am proud to be able to reflect on what has been achieved over the course of the last year, as well as what is to come.
We believe there is no contradiction between regulating to serve the public whilst simultaneously supporting economic growth. Our proportionate, business-as-usual work supports investor and stakeholder confidence, which, in combination with our change initiatives, further strengthen the FRC's position as a modern regulator.
Of course, we have demonstrated time and time again that the way we regulate has to support UK economic growth. We consider that responsibility to be two-fold through:
Contributing to a regulatory environment that both supports the attractiveness of the UK's capital markets and enables well-run businesses to secure the investment they require to grow and scale.
Supporting the attractiveness of the UK accountancy and audit profession to ensure there is a pipeline of talent that delivers services that underpin investor and broader stakeholder confidence in financial reporting.
Our approach has changed significantly over the last decade, and we welcome the confidence shown by stakeholders in our plans. That said, we are not complacent and we recognise that we need to continue to evolve to ensure we remain fit for the future.
We were disappointed that Government was unable to take forward the audit and corporate governance reform bill, however, we welcome the commitment to put the FRC on a statutory footing when parliamentary time allows. This will give us the right legislative framework to support our effective, proportionate regulation, including securing sustainable funding and bringing us in line with other regulators. Nonetheless, the improvements we have already implemented demonstrate the value stakeholders place on maintaining the UK's well-earned position globally as a place with high standards of corporate behaviour. Maintaining trust and confidence in corporate governance, reporting and audit is precisely how we can support growth and serve the public interest.
Sir Jan du Plessis
Chair
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
8
3.
The FRC at a glance
The FRC has an important purpose to serve the public interest and support UK economic growth by upholding high standards of corporate governance, corporate reporting, audit and actuarial work. The FRC's Board and executives remain focused on ensuring our current regulatory toolkit is used to best effect. This includes setting proportionate standards, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and holding those that fall short to account. This is important for all stakeholders who rely on trustworthy information to support financial decision-making.
Building trust brings better outcomes for all stakeholders
Effective independent regulator underpinning the system
Our objectives
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
9
Objective 1
Objective 2
The standards and expectations we set will enhance corporate governance, corporate reporting
Our proportionate regulation of accounting, audit, assurance and actuarial work will expect and encourage
high quality by those responsible, acting as an improvement regulator and dealing effectively and fairly with cases where there are significant or serious shortcomings.
and investor stewardship in a manner that supports UK economic growth
and investment.
Objective 3
Objective 4
We will build on our deep understanding of corporate reporting and the audit and actuarial markets we oversee, and by being agile, we will identify and prepare for opportunities and challenges on
the horizon.
We will be a modern organisation, considered by others as a respected, effective and highly engaged regulator and by our colleagues as an inclusive and great place to work.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
10
Objective 4
4.
Our business model
Our priorities to support economic growth
Underpin investor confidence in UK plc.
Reduce unnecessary burdens on business while maintaining high standards.
Develop deep insight into the markets we oversee so our regulation is based on evidence and expertise.
Identify future trends and innovations to support the health of the markets we oversee.
Support the skills and resilience of the professions we regulate.
Our values
What kind of regulator is the FRC?
The FRC expects and encourages high standards, and our focus remains on audit quality and underpinning the trust and confidence of those who rely on corporate reporting.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
11
We will be a modern organisation, considered by others as a respected, effective and highly engaged regulator and by our colleagues as an inclusive and great place to work.
What we do
Standards and expectations
The UK's reputation for high standards of governance, corporate reporting and investor stewardship has been widely considered as a source of competitive advantage for international investment. The challenge for the FRC is to strike an appropriate balance between two things:
1.
Enhancing the quality of corporate information, which benefits users of this information as well as the preparers of this information if it offers them better access to capital to grow.
2.
Avoiding unnecessary burdens while doing so.
The updated UK Stewardship Code enhances investor stewardship and supports UK economic growth by maintaining a trusted, comparable reporting framework. We continue to embed the updated UK Corporate Governance Code including Provision 29, effective from January 2026, and maintain oversight of the Wates Principles for large private companies.
The FRC also maintains the accounting standards we set for the three million businesses that follow UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice. Internationally, we continue to work with the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board including the International Standard on Sustainability Assurance (ISSA) 5000 Task Force, leading on the development of the sustainability assurance standard and aligning global practice with UK priorities.
These strategic contributions are vital for maintaining consistency across jurisdictions for corporates that trade internationally, global audit firms and investors. They reinforce trust in audit quality worldwide and ensure UK leadership is shaping the future of corporate reporting and assurance.
Progress in audit evolution
The health of the UK economy needs to be underpinned by a robust and well-functioning audit market that is supported by appropriate levels of audit quality that instil trust and confidence in users of financial statements. This is a strong platform on which to build and is a shared vision with firms, professional bodies and investors.
Our Future of Audit Supervision Strategy (FASS) programme focused on evolving our supervision regulatory model, and has resulted in our revised supervisory approach, launched in March 2026 and effective immediately for the 2026/27 inspection cycle. The programme is built around a consistent, risk-based assessment, supported by graded inspections, targeted follow-up work, thematic reviews and corroboratory inspections. Our ongoing work on our enforcement processes (the end-to-end enforcement process review (E2E)) has looked at how we can introduce a more graduated and proportionate range of interventions to apply to the individual circumstances of each case.
Future-focused approach
Our SME Programme has improved our understanding of how the audit market operates for SMEs, resulting in clearer guidance on the proportionate and scalable application of International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). We have launched the FRC Innovation
& Improvement Hub to accelerate innovation, improve audit quality and strengthen market resilience. The Hub provides stakeholders with new, flexible ways to engage with regulatory support beyond traditional regulation, such as the 'Simplifying Annual Reporting' sandbox, with the first cohort running from October 2025 to March 2026.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
12
AI adoption in audit is accelerating, and our published guidance on AI has been recognised by stakeholders for its practical, clear and timely information, providing support to those working in this quickly developing space. In addition, the Company and Organisational Data Explorer (CODEx) project delivers public tools and infrastructure for data in corporate reporting, allowing users to access structured data better.
A modern organisation
Following our move from a single City of London office building, we have embedded our dual-site model with a successful relocation to Harbour Exchange in Canary Wharf and an expanded presence in our Birmingham office at Arena Central.
To replace multiple legacy systems with a unified back-office solution, we began work on our Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) programme. This will automate tasks to increase efficiency and improve forecasting and decision-making through reliable and integrated flows of data. This improvement to our day-to-day operations will equip the FRC as a modern regulator with effective workflows and information management, in turn supporting security and internal controls. Similarly, we have further reduced our reliance on external database providers and introduced greater automation to our data gathering exercises.
Spotlight: stewardship transition year
The updated UK Stewardship Code 2026 was published in June 2025, following consultation and engagement with over 1,500 stakeholders. Reporting under the new Code is divided into two parts, the Policy & Context Disclosure, and the Activities & Outcomes Report, both serving as part of a distilled approach that maintains high standards while sharpening the focus on signatories' stewardship activities and their outcomes.
To support a smooth transition to the updated UK Stewardship Code, 2026 will be treated as a transition year. All existing signatories submitting a renewal application will remain on the signatory list throughout this period. This approach recognises that these organisations have already met the requirements to become a signatory of the 2020 Code and encourages them to embrace the updated, more flexible reporting framework without an immediate assessment of their reporting by the FRC.
To support this transition further, we have subsequently issued guidance to the Code, a guide on how to report to the 2026 Code, our publication ‘Preparing for the UK  Stewardship Code 2026: Applying insights from current reporting', and a factsheet providing answers to frequently asked questions.
STEWARDSHIP CODE
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
13
5.
Chief Executive's report
I am pleased to set out the progress we have made as an organisation in 2025/26, a period characterised by substantial change and evolving stakeholder expectations.
Our guiding principle has been to ensure we can demonstrably enhance the regulatory environment to better support growth in the UK by underpinning investor and broader public confidence in corporate governance, reporting, audit and actuarial work. This is critical for companies to access capital to invest, scale and innovate.
At the same time, we have been mindful that our role is not to prevent corporate failure, so ensuring our work supports responsible risk taking and reduces unnecessary burdens has also been key.
Our focus this year on corporate governance has been to engage significantly with companies listed in the commercial companies or closed-ended investment funds categories, which must apply the UK Corporate Governance Code. We also engaged with their representatives and advisers to ensure a smooth transition to the new arrangements for internal controls under the Code that became effective from 1 January 2026 (‘Provision 29'). I welcome the early feedback that the principles-based approach we adopted is leading to more valuable Board-level conversations about risk, without the cost of the more prescriptive and detailed approaches adopted in other jurisdictions.
We have been keen to ensure that the flexibility built into the foundation of the UK Corporate Governance Code is used by companies and respected by others, including investors and their proxy advisers. A cogent and transparent explanation to a Code provision should be seen as a sign of confidence in a Board's governance and a recognition that no two companies are identical. This flexibility in the Code is a key differentiator to the regimes that operate elsewhere like the US and EU and we believe if it is used well, the Code can be an asset for the UK's international competitiveness. On this theme of flexibility to meet individual circumstances, I was pleased that this year we also updated our guidance on non-executive remuneration to clarify that the Code does allow non-executive Board members to be paid in shares.
Our Investor Stewardship Code is often referred to as the ‘other side of the coin' to the UK Corporate Governance Code. For a voluntary code, it continues to be widely adopted and used by asset managers, asset owners, proxy advisers and other investor-based organisations. Signatories to the Stewardship Code as of January 2026 represent over
£57 trillion in assets under management. Following significant stakeholder engagement, we updated the Code this year to better focus on growth, streamline its requirements and reduce the reporting burden.
Audit plays a critical role in supporting trust and transparency, underpinning confidence in the financial statements. The quality of audit across the public interest entity (PIE) market has significantly improved since 2018; a time when the reputation of audit was damaged by several high-profile disorderly corporate failures where audit would have been expected to flag the heightened risk in advance. We cannot take this progress for granted or become complacent – audit quality requires constant vigilance and focus. New risks and
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
14
opportunities are always arising and we still see some uncomfortable inconsistencies between audit firms and, on occasion, even within the same firm.
This year, the improvement in audit quality combined with new risks and opportunities on the horizon has led us to think about how our own regulatory approaches should change to ensure they remain effective and proportionate in the future.
In March 2026, we introduced a revised supervisory approach that places greater emphasis on assurance over firms' systems of quality management, alongside a reduced reliance on individual file inspection scores. We believe this approach is more suited to embedding continuous learning and improvement within the sector and gives us a holistic view of
a firm's approach and commitment to delivering audit quality.
We also launched an important consultation on our approach to enforcement, where we have a role to hold to account those whose work contains serious or significant failures. Although the overall number of cases that are investigated remains low compared to the number of statutory PIE audits undertaken each year, we developed some significant
proposals for change – including a broader suite of routes to resolution, rather than relying solely on the current investigation model.
Ensuring that we remained abreast of audit market developments was also a key feature in our work this year. For example, we spent a substantial amount of time working with firms and investors to ensure regulatory expectations were understood when private capital was being used to acquire an interest in an audit firm. We issued guidance for auditors on the use of AI. We also supported the audit industry's ability to trade freely and enhance its pipeline of talent by continuing our work with international partners on the mutual recognition of statutory auditors, with encouraging discussions ongoing with several strategic partners around the world.
In February, Sir Jan announced his retirement as of September 2026. Under his leadership we have seen a significant modernisation and strengthening of our role. His commitment and experience has brought crucial depth and insight to our work, helping us navigate
in a pragmatic way that contributes to UK economic growth. I am deeply grateful for the support and wise counsel he has given to me and to the organisation, so I want to take this opportunity to express my sincere thanks.
We have seen change in our executive team, with the departure of Elizabeth Barrett, Sarah Rapson and Kate O'Neill this year. All three have contributed greatly to the FRC's progress over recent years. I was delighted to appoint candidates of the calibre of Penrose Foss and Anthony Barrett to succeed Elizabeth and Sarah.
Richard Moriarty
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
15
In support of UK growth
Underpinning investor confidence in UK plc
Our work continues to foster a regulatory environment that supports growth in the UK by strengthening investor confidence through high-quality audits of well-prepared accounts and transparent reporting. This enables well-run companies to access the capital they need to grow and create jobs. We help to maintain trust and confidence in the information produced by companies and used by a range of stakeholders, including investors, creditors, and employees, as well as the communities in which they operate. This in turn enables companies to secure capital and the broader support they need to grow and prosper
in the long term, as well as supporting capital markets to work effectively.
In recognition of the continued importance of sustainability to our stakeholders and the wider ecosystem, in May 2025 we proposed the introduction of the UK version of ISSA 5000 to promote use among UK assurance practitioners to ensure consistent, quality, sustainability assurance engagements across the UK markets. The final version of the standard, issued for use on a voluntary basis, will contribute to greater international alignment of sustainability assurance engagements.
We have continued to focus on the Codes we oversee, with an extensive programme of engagement in place to ensure that stakeholders are confident in how to approach and implement them. Comply or explain remains a key part of the flexibility and we have been encouraging company boards to think for themselves when considering whether compliance is right for them, or whether explanation better suits their business model. As part of this work, we issued renewed comply or explain guidance in March, and have worked on areas such as non-executive remuneration to support good governance.
As discussed in our business model (see page 10), we have had significant engagement on two major projects, E2E and FASS. On E2E, we are committed to ensuring that our regulatory approach means that firms know what to expect in their engagement with our investigations and enforcement activity, and the quality of co-operation required of them. In March 2026, we announced the culmination of our FASS work via the implementation of our revised supervisory approach starting with the largest firms in April 2026, with further developments piloted during 2026/27.
Reducing unnecessary burdens on business while maintaining high standards
We remain committed to working with all of our stakeholders to support the Government's ambition to reduce administrative burdens for business. We look for opportunities to ensure our work is as proportionate and effective as possible to remove unnecessary reporting or regulatory burden.
We have continued to review some areas of our work on an annual basis to ensure the standards we set remain proportionate and fit for purpose. In May 2026, following its annual review cycle, we issued amendments to 'Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 101 - Reduced Disclosure Framework' which provide an optional framework for cost-effective financial reporting within groups. This enables entities to take advantage of reporting exemptions, while still meeting the information needs of users of their reporting.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
16
Our work continues in audit, ethics and corporate reporting to ensure better alignment with international standards and to reduce additional costs for UK businesses in a proportionate way. In October, we issued our consultation on proposed revisions to ISA (UK) 240 and (UK) 570. These two revised ISAs were published in March 2026 and align with recent revisions to equivalent international counterparts, designed to preserve the UK's position in global financial markets.
In April 2025, we introduced a quarterly consultation schedule, intended to deliver greater consistency and provide clarity for stakeholders, making it easier for interested parties
to anticipate, prepare for and respond to regulatory developments. Alongside this, we continue to contribute to the Regulatory Initiatives Grid from the Financial Services Regulatory Initiatives Forum, so stakeholders can see how our work aligns and coincides with that of other regulators.
In the last year, we have taken significant steps in our actuarial work including publishing an updated version of the Technical Actuarial Standard (TAS) 300 in July, which removed provisions that are no longer needed and provided greater clarity to practitioners. We also issued proportionality guidance for actuaries in October to support the application of the principles-based standards in a proportionate and outcome-driven way. We withdrew Actuarial Statement of Recommended Practice (ASORP) 1 as it was no longer required following the most recent revisions to TAS 100.
Spotlight: guidance to support actuaries dealing with historic amendments to pension rules
In January 2026, we issued guidance to help pension scheme actuaries provide retrospective confirmation to validate historic changes to pension scheme rules. This work required close collaboration with industry, including extensive input from the Institute and Faculty
of Actuaries and the Association of Consulting Actuaries.
The guidance recognised concerns raised across the pensions industry. It provides clear, practical help on how to work proportionately when reviewing historic scheme changes to support sound judgement and strengthen confidence that pension schemes have complied with their legal obligations.
In March 2026, we hosted a webinar to explain how the guidance was developed and how actuaries can apply it in a proportionate, evidence-based way that aligns with the Technical Actuarial Standards.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
17
Developing deep insight into the markets we oversee so our regulation is based on evidence and expertise
As identified in our objectives, we consider it crucial to our work that we have a deep understanding of the audit and actuarial markets we oversee. One significant piece of work in relation to this has been our SME audit market study, which concluded in March with the announcement of a package of measures to make audits more proportionate and efficient for SMEs, helping to support their growth and access to capital. As part of this, we have committed to:
Publish new guidance to support auditors to apply auditing standards in a way that is relative to the complexity and size of the business.
Launch a new programme of engagement with auditors of SMEs to support their understanding of the new guidance.
Develop a Technology Sandbox within the Innovation & Improvement Hub to enable smaller audit firms to get support when adopting AI and new technology to improve audit quality.
Establish a new working group with the Recognised Supervisory Bodies (RSBs) to promote more consistency in how audits of SMEs are supervised.
Engage with stakeholders on the international Less Complex Entities auditing standard, providing UK stakeholders with the opportunity to influence its future development.
This work recognises that SMEs are a cornerstone of the UK economy, driving innovation, creating jobs and powering growth, so it sits within our wider work to reduce burdens
on businesses and support economic growth. During the study, we engaged with over 500 stakeholders, including SMEs, capital providers and auditors, to better understand how the audit market is working in practice and where improvements can be made. We also engaged with RSB audit inspectors and third party methodology providers to ensure that the remedies we were considering would meet their needs too. We saw that auditors sometimes lack confidence to use the scalability provisions in standards and the published Practice Note will support them to do so.
We conduct a number of annual reviews throughout the year relating to various parts of our work to help us and our stakeholders better understand how the market is working and to consider the best approach to our regulation. Our annual review of corporate reporting, published in September, showed that the quality of corporate reporting across FTSE 350 companies had been maintained across the 2024/25 monitoring cycle. We saw that a lower proportion of our reviews resulted in queries being raised with companies compared with previous years, with the overall number of restatements also falling.
Our review of corporate governance reporting, issued in November, analysed reporting trends and practices among 100 UK-listed companies against the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code. It highlighted examples of good practice such as comprehensive explanations that outline company rationale, and described alternative governance arrangements in place. In December, we published our first reporting insights from
the Wates Corporate Governance Principles for Large Private Companies since assuming oversight of the principles at the start of 2025. This recognised the flexible framework these provide to private companies to raise standards of corporate governance and reporting.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
18
Our annual review of audit quality, covering the inspection and supervision results of audit firms across the PIE market, called for all stakeholders in the UK audit landscape to work together to deliver a thriving market and profession working in the public interest. Finally, our annual enforcement review illustrates our expectations by referring to specific themes and case studies, allowing us to communicate this to our stakeholders. This year's report included spotlights covering the Ethical Standard, management challenge and sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
These reviews are consistently well received by our stakeholders and allow us to develop the deep understanding of the market we need to ensure our regulation is fit for purpose.
Identifying future trends and innovations to support the health of the markets we oversee
Our work continues to advance and support innovation, quality and market resilience to increase regulatory certainty for our stakeholders and promote outcomes-based regulation. We recognise the fast development of technology and AI in the sector and more widely, so this is considered in our work.
We have continued to work with our regulatory partners to drive up the quality of digital reporting, building on our discussion paper to further develop our taxonomies and digital reporting. Our review of structured digital reporting in April 2025 highlighted key improvement areas for how UK-listed companies present their digital annual reports.
Our final report of our CODEx project summarised the work we have done alongside the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Companies House, The Charity Commission and HMRC, to find innovative and cost-effective ways of accessing and using structured accounting and reporting data in the UK.
Our feedback statement on opportunities for future UK digital reporting, published in May 2025, demonstrated the stakeholder support for digital reporting and the need for a collaborative approach to address the challenges the sector will face in the next phase of digital reporting. In support of our work in this space, we hosted a series of outreach events and associated hackathons beginning in March 2026, which supported improved understanding of digital reporting using XBRL and the UK taxonomies.
Supporting the skills and resilience of the professions we regulate
While the FRC has statutory responsibilities with regards to RSBs, we believe that we also have a role in supporting the skills and resilience of the professions we regulate. In
recognition of this, we seek to provide the support and guidance necessary to ensure the professions we regulate are able to understand, use and implement the regulations we set.
In September, we launched our Building Capacity and Capability for Smaller Firms initiative, which introduced a more proportionate supervisory approach, designed to enhance
audit quality and reflect the unique needs of smaller firms. Smaller UK PIE audit firms were invited to participate in a new workstream on the FRC's Audit Firm Scalebox, the ‘Scalebox-SoQM'. Those firms that accepted this invitation and committed to investing and developing their Systems of Quality Management (SoQM) are subject to reduced formal inspection, supervision and registration requirements during 2026 and 2027 to allow them space and time to develop and grow. This complements broader developments in our supervisory approach as addressed through the FASS project.
Fourteen investigations were concluded in the 12 months to 31 March 2026. The publication of outcomes are intended to be educative and we have set financial and non-financial sanctions tailored to reflect the issues identified in the matters investigated, which are aimed at promoting transparency and accountability, and maintaining professional standards.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
19
Over the course of the last year, we have also created a number of factsheets, mythbusters and Q&As, such as ‘What is an audit?', the factsheet for FRS 102 preparers, our Provision 29 mythbuster and the UK Stewardship Code 2026 factsheet. We also issued podcasts to support stakeholders to better understand our work, which last year included our summer series on corporate governance.
Spotlight: Artificial Intelligence
AI is transforming the world around us, and the FRC can benefit from the use of these technologies to deliver against our objectives. We are supportive of the use of AI tools with appropriate risk management, both externally and internally, and our three-year strategy focuses on AI and technology as a priority area for us to address as a modern and agile regulator.
In June 2025, we published our AI in audit guidance, outlining a coherent approach to implementing a hypothetical AI-enabled tool and offering insights into FRC documentation requirements, all designed to support innovation. This was followed by our Generative and Agentic AI  guidance, issued in March 2026. This discusses audit quality risks associated with generative and agentic AI tools, alongside possible mitigations and principles for exercising professional judgement when seeking to obtain appropriate confidence in the outputs of these tools.
Following the launch of our Innovation & Improvement Hub in September 2025, we will look to tackle challenges around responsible use of AI through future sandboxes and other initiatives, including how AI might affect the future of audit. This is part of our commitment to identify and act on future trends and innovations to support the health of the markets we oversee.
Internally, teams are considering ways that AI can support their work. The Corporate Governance and Stewardship team has been testing the use of an AI tool to assist with evidence-gathering for its reviews of reporting, work previously undertaken through a time-consuming manual tagging process. By improving efficiency at this stage, the AI tool has allowed the team to focus more of its time on reviewing reporting quality and exercising professional judgement. Similarly, the Actuarial Regulation team is testing the tool to collate, analyse and summarise consultation responses in parallel with non-AI methods to assess accuracy and develop our capabilities to deploy the technology in future consultations.
We are also ensuring that our work complies with the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No.2) Accessibility Regulations 2018, using AI to produce HTML versions of some publications to promote accessibility for screen readers on
our website.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
20
6.
Operational Performance Measures
In measuring our performance, a series of targets are agreed and monitored during the year. The FRC's Executive Committee (ExCo) regularly receives detailed management information that underpins each of the published Operational Performance Measures (OPMs). Our 2025/26 performance against some of the key measures is shown below, together with performance from the previous year.
2025/26
2024/25
Category
Measure
RAG
Target
Result
Result
status1
140-150
140
141
Supervision and monitoring
Number of Audit Quality Review inspections completed
240-260
248
222
Number of Corporate Reporting Review (CRR) reports completed
98%
100%
100%
Complaints against professional bodies for auditors, accountants and actuaries investigated and responded to within six weeks
100%
100%
98%
PIE auditor registration applications which do not raise any compliance issues will be processed, and a decision taken, within 25 working days of the date on which all required documentation and information has been submitted to the FRC
Enforcement
50%
50%
90%
Enforcement cases concluded, settled, or closed within
two-year target2
80%
100%
87%
Enforcement cases concluded, settled, or closed within
three-year target2
£61.4m
£58.0m5
£63.4m
Financial and operational performance
Operating costs against budget (excluding UK Endorsement Board (UKEB) cost and case cost)
480
457
459
Recruitment (staff) against budget3 4
98%
100%
100%
FRC complaints responded to within service level agreement timeframe
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
21
1
A green RAG status, shown by a green circle with a tick icon, indicates whether targets have been achieved or missed for reasons that the Board has determined to have been outside of the FRC's control.
2
The Enforcement OPMs are:
A period of two years between the notification of the commencement of the investigation and service of either the Proposed Formal Complaint, Investigation Report (or closure or settlement if sooner) in 50% of cases in a financial reporting period (1 April to 31 March).
A period of three years between the notification of the commencement of investigation and service of either the Proposed Formal Complaint, Investigation Report (or closure or settlement if sooner) in 80% of cases in a financial reporting period (1 April to 31 March).
3
This number is the maximum headcount expected for the year and so is considered on target if the total number of employees remains below this.
4
This headcount figure excludes cover for maternity leave, shared parental leave, or sickness absence.
5
This figure is derived from total operating costs after the deduction of UKEB specific cost (£5.1m) and case cost (£2.5m), subject to rounding.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
22
7.
Our people and culture framework
Our work relies on experts and professionals to guide and develop the evolution of the sectors we regulate or oversee as a modern regulator. We have developed our People Strategy to ensure we recruit, retain and develop the necessary skills, experience and values to meet our objectives. Fostering diversity, advancing equity and cultivating inclusion are essential to being an organisation considered by our colleagues as an inclusive and great place to work.
Our Birmingham office now accounts for 14.2% of our overall workforce, with two members of ExCo based there. March 2026 marked a year in our Harbour Exchange office in London, providing modern facilities that support flexible and collaborative ways of working. Our hybrid working programme remains in place across the organisation with the expectation of 40% office attendance for all colleagues. This allows our people to combine the benefits of working from home with time in the office, enabling collaboration no matter where we are working.
Engaged colleagues
We conduct an annual People Survey, inviting all colleagues to share their anonymous views to help develop and improve the way the FRC works, as well as identify key issues, priorities for improvement, and areas of success and good practice. Feedback from the survey is considered by the People Committee and ExCo. Following our 2024/25 People Survey, our actions focused on three organisation-wide programmes:
Joined-up working.
Learning and development.
Continuing to embed our values and behaviours.
The 2025/26 survey saw improved scores across all three of these areas, and each of these remained a key part of our people plans for the year, as well as an additional focus on speaking up and wellbeing.
Our people remain at the heart of how we deliver high-quality, forward-looking regulation. This year, our people networks have continued to play an important role in shaping an inclusive culture. These employee-led groups have continued to grow and mature, and comprise nine networks related to areas of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI), four faith groups and ten informal social groups. Each offers space for discussion, peer support and shared learning, and collectively they contribute to a culture where colleagues feel heard, represented and empowered.
We bring together colleagues from our London and Birmingham offices through our monthly town halls, held in a hybrid format, as well as at divisional and team-level meetings. Our town halls provide a regular opportunity for colleagues to hear directly from senior leaders, including a business update from the CEO, learning about ongoing regulatory and organisational priorities, and gaining a better understanding of the work of teams across the organisation. There is good attendance each month and this has remained consistent throughout this year. Sessions are also recorded, so those who
are unable to attend can watch back. Colleagues are encouraged to actively participate through live Q&A and anonymous pre-submissions, supporting open dialogue and ensuring that communication remains responsive to our people's needs.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
23
All FRC staff are entitled to two days' paid volunteering or Corporate Social Responsibility leave per year. Over the course of the last year, colleagues across the FRC have used 1,149 volunteering hours, equating to 164 days. Ten organisations, including local schools, have benefitted.
We remain committed to the wellbeing of our colleagues, providing access to an online GP and physiotherapy, counselling and legal advice services. We also host webinars and workshops to support health and wellbeing.
We provide a healthy and safe working environment for all of our colleagues and visitors. We have a dedicated team of fire marshals, first aiders and mental health first aiders to support colleagues and record any incidents. Per employee, the average working days lost to absence for the 12 months to March 2026 was 5.3 days (2025: 5.7 days).
Learning, development and talent
We continue to allocate six days per year for each employee's learning and development activities, with the potential for more with the agreement of an individual's manager. We provide a wide range of learning and development activities, from mandatory and technical training to support continuous knowledge and professional development, to internal and external programmes to develop leadership skills.
Of 457 employees, 296 are members of professional bodies and 19 are working towards professional qualifications.
Over the last year, attrition has remained low with a voluntary turnover of 7% and an involuntary turnover of 1.8%. We have had 18 people return from parental leave. Of the 76 vacancies filled in 2025/26, 42 were internal appointments, demonstrating our commitment to providing opportunities for our people to develop their careers.
We continue to invest in colleague development through our people-centred leadership programmes. The Empower Programme supports level 1 and 2 employees to develop core skills such as communication and presentation, building networks and community, and career planning. Over the course of six months, participants receive one-to-one coaching sessions and workshop.
Our Leadership Fundamentals Programme supports colleagues at levels 3 and 4, providing core leadership knowledge and practical tools to support progression into more senior roles. Together, these programmes help to support colleagues at every stage of their career.
Diversity, equity and inclusion
We recognise that a diverse and inclusive workplace is not only the right thing to do, but is also essential for driving innovation, employee engagement, better decision-making and improved outcomes. Our DE&I strategy for 2025/27 reflects this and reaffirms our commitment to embedding these values in everything we do at the FRC.
Our gender pay gap sits at 5.3% (median figure) and our mean figure sits at 10.4%. Since we began reporting in 2018, the median pay gap has decreased from 27.8%, a reduction of 80.9%. The mean gender pay gap reflects the generally even distribution of people
by gender at all job levels in the organisation, including four of the seven positions on our ExCo.
Our DE&I Committee coordinates and champions the various networks that exist across the organisation, and ensures alignment of these groups with the DE&I strategy. The FRC is Menopause Friendly, Disability Confident, and a signatory to the HM Treasury Women in Finance charter.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
24
We are proud to be a signatory to the Government's Disability Confident Scheme, which guarantees an interview to disabled applicants who meet the minimum criteria for any job vacancy. We also partner with the Business Disability Forum and are accredited as a Level 2 Disability Confident Employer, reflecting our commitment to removing barriers for disabled people across recruitment, retention and talent development. For more information, visit our careers page.
As part of our ongoing commitment to support talent development, social mobility and early careers at the FRC, we offer initiatives including our work experience programme, promote external mentoring opportunities and organise career insight visits with the East London Business Alliance.
Spotlight: changes to our performance evaluation process
This year, the FRC launched a revised performance evaluation process. This provides a framework for aligning our individual objectives, performance and development with organisational goals to ensure optimised performance.
Following broad consultation, briefings and training for employees and managers, the change has
seen five differentiated levels of performance, rather than the previous three, and the addition of a ‘performance gateway'. This provides a more
robust process that supports the provision of both good developmental feedback and recognition
of outstanding performance by individuals. The gateway introduced a set of minimum expectations for colleagues, including consideration of our values and behaviours, completion of mandatory training, and meeting our hybrid working expectations.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
25
8.
Section 172 and stakeholder engagement
Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) requires directors to consider the interests of stakeholders in their decision-making. In particular, section 172 (1) states that regard should be had to:
The long-term consequences of decisions.
The interests of the company's employees.
The need to foster the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others.
The impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment.
The desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct.
Our direct stakeholders include companies, institutional investors, auditors, actuaries, accountants, their respective professional bodies, regulators and the Government.
Our indirect stakeholders include retail shareholders, suppliers, employees, customers, communities, pension holders and savers, and financial institutions. All of our stakeholders have an interest in the health of companies and other organisations within our existing and future regulatory scope, and in the success of the UK corporate sector as a whole.
The directors are fully aware of their responsibilities to promote the success of the company in accordance with section 172. Consideration of stakeholders' interests has always been integral to our work and decision-making. Our Stakeholder Engagement & Corporate Affairs team continues to deliver high-quality engagement with our stakeholders and increase the reach, engagement and targeting of our communications and activity.
Our approach to stakeholder engagement
We engage with our stakeholders by focusing on:
Creating a network of advocates.
Soliciting senior-level input.
Positioning the FRC as a leader in key debates on topics where we have regulatory remit or interest.
Gathering input into policymaking and consultations.
Driving awareness and engagement with our Codes and good practice.
Ensuring that the FRC is a part of relevant decision-making bodies and groups.
Board consideration of stakeholder matters
The Board and ExCo received regular briefings on stakeholder engagement, insights and risk and reputation management during the year. The Board carefully considers the impact of its decisions on stakeholder groups and the directors acknowledge that, as an independent regulator with a public interest remit, its decisions will not always be supported by all stakeholders. Major policy issues are subject to consultation and responses are carefully considered to inform decision-making, with due process on consultations relating to matters of public interest. Feedback statements are issued
following consideration of consultation responses, and these are published on our website.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
26
For example, feedback received through consultation on the proposed revisions to the UK Stewardship Code was discussed by the Board and led to changes to the final proposals to improve clarity, proportionality and usability for signatories. Similarly, stakeholder engagement informed the Board's consideration of the FRC's Plan and Budget. Views
expressed by stakeholders on regulatory priorities were reflected in decisions on proposed activities, sequencing and resource allocation for the coming year.
We periodically survey our stakeholder universe to understand and consider their perceptions of our work, communications and engagement, and our reputation as we take forward our regulatory activities. In 2025/26, we conducted a stakeholder perceptions survey to support our work in delivering our strategic objectives as set out in our three-year strategy. By ensuring that stakeholders' perceptions of our work reflects our intentions, we are better able to plan and adapt our approach to support stakeholder needs. The survey also helped us to understand how stakeholders perceive us in the context of the wider political, regulatory and business environment.
The Board has a process in place for decision-making, taking into account the FRC's strategic objectives, culture and values to ensure it has confidence in the decisions it makes. Our board paper templates and the information provided to the Board reflect the likely long-term impacts on our stakeholders, setting out the relevant issues and how they have been considered during discussions.
The Board also works to ensure that its decisions are consistent. Regular updates are provided to the Board on key actions that have been undertaken. When making
key decisions, the directors also have regard to the need to foster the FRC's business relationship with suppliers, customers and all other stakeholders in our supply chain.
The success of the FRC is dependent on strong engagement with all of our stakeholders, and we recognise their valuable contribution to our work. Some particular highlights from this year include:
Extensive engagement with stakeholders on our FASS and E2E projects to ensure that our work is robust, transparent and effective, while also proportionate and able to meet the expectations of the modern regulatory landscape.
The start of 15 consultations across audit, corporate reporting, actuarial and accounting policy areas with webinars and roundtables used to engage with stakeholders and encourage them to participate.
Approval and publication of the 2026/27 Plan and Budget following consultation with stakeholders.
A Board strategy day to review delivery against strategic objectives, and to manage and understand our stakeholders' interests. We also ran an event for the FRC's non-executive advisers to update them on current and ongoing developments.
Engagement with stakeholders in relation to the transition to the UK Stewardship Code 2026, and Provision 29 of the Corporate Governance Code, both effective from 1 January 2026.
The Stakeholder Insight Group (SIG) represents preparers, investors and other key parts of our stakeholder universe including reporting framework owners and civil society groups. The SIG forms part of our strategic approach to stakeholder engagement, which enables us to keep track of emerging themes affecting stakeholders in UK business.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
27
Our Chair, CEO and ExCo meet directly with our key stakeholders and also participate in events, roundtables and other forums. We actively engage with ministers, MPs, peers
and other government departments and executive bodies to provide clarity on the FRC's responsibilities and priorities, as well as with other regulators and regulatory partners to aid in delivering our objectives.
The Board regularly engages with employees and the wider workforce through the People Forum, as well as the annual People Survey to identify key issues and priorities for improvement.
Spotlight: Stakeholder Insight Group
To support the FRC to fulfil its purpose, the Stakeholder Insight Group (SIG), founded in 2022, provides valuable input, external perspectives and diversity of thought to help guide the FRC's strategy and activities.
Membership of the SIG brings together stakeholders from across industry and the wider ecosystem, including investors, professional bodies, business representatives, legal firms, public interest groups and those with a demonstrable interest in reporting, audit and corporate governance.
The SIG and its members are expected to share their perspectives on:
Key opportunities and potential areas of focus for the FRC.
Key areas of concern and emerging risks relating to accounting, reporting, auditing, actuarial and governance issues.
Market developments and feed back key narratives from their own sectors.
Over the last year, the SIG has discussed topics such as:
our strategic outlook, with horizon scanning on areas or subjects to consider prioritising for the year ahead;
stakeholder responses to major FRC projects, with input into our forward planning for FASS and E2E and review of the new Stewardship Code;
and developments in corporate reporting and sustainability.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
28
9.
Environmental impacts and ESG
You can find our disclosures on the following pages:
Compliance
p31
Environmental issues
p28
Data handling and data security
p31
People and culture
p22
Employee engagement
p22
Professional integrity
p32
Governance
The FRC Board has ultimate responsibility for the FRC's consideration of, and response to, environmental and sustainability related issues. It considers these in its strategic discussions and focus on current and emerging risks relating to the FRC's strategy and objectives.
Strategy
The FRC recognises the growing demands for meaningful, assured and comparable sustainability reporting and the significant implications that these demands will have for businesses and investors in the UK. We support our sustainability and environmental initiatives through our role as Secretariat to the UK Sustainability Advisory Committee and the UK Sustainability Disclosure Technical Advisory Committee. We carefully consider what disclosures we request as a regulator and will continue to work closely with stakeholders in responding to a changing regulatory and reporting landscape.
We have made voluntary disclosures in relation to paper and plastic use, and business travel. We will continue to assess the quality and maturity of climate-related disclosures and publish additional data on our environmental impact related to our locations, in line with Government commitments.
Risk assessment
Our current assessment, within our overall risk framework, is that we as an organisation are not significantly exposed to the physical risks of climate change in the short and medium term, and that climate change does not represent a specific threat to our viability or ability to operate. We do, however, take account of the potential impact
of climate-related disruption, for example to travel or power supply, in setting and testing our business continuity policies and procedures.
Energy efficiency metrics
The FRC's location in London occupies one floor of a multi-tenanted, externally managed building. In Birmingham, we share a floor with other tenants and occupy around 50 desks, also in an externally managed building. We are therefore unable to independently implement changes to our energy and water systems, which in turn limits our ability to set attainable, data-driven reduction targets for our electricity, gas and water consumption.
Greenhouse gas emissions have been calculated for our London office in accordance with the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) requirements, using the UK Government Greenhouse Gas Conversion Factors for Company Reporting 2025. We occupy a number of desks within a floor in our Birmingham office so it is neither practical nor material to include our electricity consumption in that building.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
29
Emissions are reported in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e) and cover Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. Comparisons were not made with previous years as data for our former office location could not be provided due to the external building management lacking the systems to produce data. This is the first year of occupancy in our London office and we intend to compare our emissions data with prior years going forward.
2025/26
33,640
Scope 1 consumption (kWh)*
Natural gas
Purchased electricity
454,637.81
Scope 2 consumption (kWh)*
488,277.8
Total energy consumption (kWh)
6.16
Scope 1 emissions (tCO2e)
80.47
Scope 2 emissions (tCO2e)
86.63
Total carbon emissions (tCO2e)
*Based on energy consumption data provided by our landlord in our London office. It was not practical to include actual Quarter 4 data as this was not available, hence estimates were used based on Quarter 3 data provided by our landlord.
Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions from natural gas consumption were 6.16 tonnes of (tCO2e), calculated using the UK Government Greenhouse Gas Conversion Factors for Company Reporting 2025.
Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions (location-based) from purchased electricity (UK grid) were 80.47 tonnes of (tCO2e), calculated using the UK Government Greenhouse Gas Conversation Factors for Company Reporting 2025.
While we have disclosed our total business travel metric in kilometers, our Scope 3 emissions in line with SECR have not been reported as it was not practical to obtain the relevant data breakdowns. We intend to provide this in subsequent reporting.
We remain aware that cloud computing can greatly enhance energy efficiency and lower greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional on-premise services, and
we continue to be a ‘cloud first' organisation that ensures that our business applications are all in the cloud and our consumption is minimised. We are also looking to move our Disaster Recovery Systems to the cloud as part of our efforts to improve our consumption efficiency. We continue our consolidation efforts to adopt more servers from Microsoft, which would reduce our estate of applications and make us more efficient.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
30
Other metrics
We collect data on IT waste, single-use plastics, paper and business travel, which we provide to Government as part of the Greening Government Commitments. By collecting this data, we are able to identify and promote positive trends in our consumption and waste.
2025/26
2024/25
458
573
Paper consumption (A4 reams equivalent)
2,561
4,220
Single-use plastic consumption (no. of items)
1,039,584
1,019,842
Business travel (km)
Paper and plastic
Our paper use significantly decreased by 20% from last year's consumption, reflecting progress on sustainability and efficiency. As we transition to GovPrint, we hope to improve our sustainability measures by reducing unnecessary printing and waste. Our people
are reminded of the need to print only if necessary. Our single-use plastic consumption count also recorded a significant 39% decrease from the previous year. We recognise the environmental impact associated with single-use plastics and are committed to minimising their use across our operations. We also continue to consider non-plastic alternatives to consumables in our kitchens.
Business travel
All FRC business travel complies with our travel policy, which requires our people to consider the environmental impact of their travel before making arrangements. Increased rail travel between our dual locations in London and Birmingham accounts for the majority of the increase in business travel this year. Total air travel has declined year-on-year, contributing to a reduced environmental impact.
Waste management
In line with our policy on the disposal of IT equipment, we have a responsibility under several UK/EU directives, including the Landfill Directive, the Waste Electronic & Electrical Equipment Directive and the Hazardous Waste Directive, to ensure that final disposal of all waste electronic and electrical equipment is responsible and traceable. We engage an external contractor to manage the disposal of any IT equipment, identifying items to sell, refurbish, recycle or send to landfill. We also partner with a specialist recycling company, which collects and recycles toner cartridges under strict, environmentally responsible standards.
We continue to have separate bins for food waste, recyclables (including metals, plastics and paper) and non-recyclable waste for collection by building waste managers, in line with legislation.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
31
Compliance
10.
Data handling
Information and data loss is recognised as one of the FRC's principal risks and, as such, is included on the Principal Risk Register. ExCo and the Board, supported by the Audit & Risk Committee, keep these risks and controls in place to mitigate those risks under review on a regular basis. We keep a separate Record of Processing Activities and an Information Asset Register.
We operate an internal Information Governance Group (IGG) that meets quarterly to review, assess and improve operational oversight and coordination of information governance and controls. The remit of the IGG allows it to support our people's engagement with, and commitment to, information handling. It also identifies areas of concern at an early stage for escalation to ExCo or the Audit & Risk Committee, if appropriate.
We understand the importance of privacy and maintaining trust and confidence in our data handling processes. Our Legal Services team maintains our privacy and data retention
policies and procedures, working closely with the Data Protection Officer. The Legal Services team also oversees responses to all General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, and compliance with applicable legislation, including UK GDPR. All FRC employees and Board members have received mandatory training on relevant aspects of UK GDPR, online security risks and FOIA. Through our processes and procedures, we are able to provide assurance that personal data is handled and processed in line with the seven UK GDPR principles. Information on our privacy policies can be found on our website.
We ensure we have an up-to-date IT architecture in place to defend the FRC against data security and loss threats that may occur when colleagues work in the office or at home. Our IT team takes a layered approach to defending the systems of the organisation,
employing several technologies to protect the estate. The team constantly reviews the threat landscape and the cybersecurity market for new tools and systems. Our Procurement team also ensures we follow compliance when contracts are up for renewal. During 2025/26, 19 data incidents were reported internally. None of these were reportable to the Information Commissioner's Office.
Increasing use of AI across the sector has the potential to positively impact the way that we deliver our functions. However, any AI systems we use must be safe, secure and designed to prevent harm to individuals, organisations and the market and sectors.
Any and all AI-generated content must be checked and validated by the individual using it. Any future potential use of AI must be formally approved by the FRC.
Managing conflicts of interest
All FRC employees and non-executives must comply with The FRC Code of Conduct and make up-to-date, full disclosures regarding their external interests and any gifts and hospitality received, to ensure that our work remains free from bias. New joiners must disclose their relevant interests prior to signing their contract. Colleagues are not permitted to take part in work relating to an entity they have worked for in the last three years, unless an exemption request has been viewed and approved by a member of ExCo. Our people are also required to have no conflicts of interest when exercising regulatory functions. In accordance with the policy, the People Committee regularly reviews disclosures made by Board members, ExCo and Senior Advisers. A Register of Interests is published on our website.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
32
Gifts and hospitality
In accordance with policy, the People Committee regularly reviews disclosures made by Board members and ExCo. The Gift and Hospitality Register is published quarterly on our website. ExCo also reviews all colleague disclosures on a quarterly basis. The Gifts and Hospitality and Conflicts of Interest policies were reviewed and updated during the year, and all colleagues were enrolled to complete online training modules to support their knowledge in this area.
Bribery and anti-corruption policy
During 2025/26, the FRC recorded no cases of bribery. UK legislation on bribery applies to the FRC, its employees and members of the governance structure. The FRC Code of
Conduct, which colleagues and members of the governance structure must follow, sets out that all colleagues must not bribe another person (including offering, promising or giving a financial or other advantage), accept a bribe (including requesting, agreeing to receive, or accepting a financial or other advantage), or facilitate or condone an act of bribery.
The FRC undertook a review of its fraud prevention policies and procedures in readiness for the new ‘failure to prevent fraud' offence that is coming into force under section 199 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023. The updated policy framework reflects the FRC's continued commitment to preventing fraud and upholding the highest standards of integrity.
Whistleblowing
The FRC maintains its own whistleblowing mechanisms and internal investigation procedures, which are reviewed annually by the Audit & Risk Committee. The FRC's central complaints function conducts internal reviews into any external complaints received about the FRC itself. An Independent Complaints Reviewer may be appointed to review our processes should a complainant have any outstanding concerns.
Litigation
During 2025/26, the FRC suffered no monetary losses as a result of legal proceedings associated with our professional integrity, which would include negligence of duty, malpractice, breach of contract, fraud, corruption or bribery.
Modern slavery
The FRC Board annually reviews our Modern Slavery Statement. The FRC does not condone any activity that constitutes modern slavery or human trafficking under the Act. Our suppliers (and supply chain) should maintain the same approach, and we have policies and procedures in place to minimise the risk of modern slavery occurring. Our Modern Slavery Statement is available to view on our website.
Payment practices
The FRC complies with the public sector procurement rules as stipulated in the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. The FRC's supplier relationships seek to deliver successful, sustainable solutions. New and existing suppliers must continuously align their approach, processes and procedures to the core principles relating to minimising risk and compliance with regulations and legislation. In addition, suppliers should strive for good practice relating to information security, financial management and business continuity. It is FRC policy to pay suppliers when or before payments become due, and we endeavour
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
33
to pay suppliers within 21 days of the date of invoice (achieved in 2025/26: 11 days). As part of the accountability report, we confirm that there are no remote contingent liabilities to report, no loss or special payments made, no gifts made over the prescribed limit in Managing Public Money, and fees and charges are not material.
Other matters
In accordance with Managing Public Money, we are required to provide information on certain matters including losses and special payments, gifts, remote contingent liabilities, and fees and charges. Information on fees and charges has been provided in the Financial Review, and we confirm there are no other matters to report. Our proactive commitment to the responsible management of public money continues to guide everything we do.
During the financial year, we delivered a refresher training course for all budget holders and colleagues with delegated financial authority, reinforcing their responsibilities in safeguarding public funds. We also enhanced our organisational defences by further reinforcing our fraud prevention measures, including delivering fraud prevention training to all our people.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
34
11.
Managing complaints to the FRC
The FRC reviews complaints and referrals received from the public in line with its role in encouraging confidence in the integrity of accountants, actuaries, auditing and corporate reporting. The majority of the complaints we receive that are within our remit concern regulated activities. A small number of complaints are also received about the FRC.
Many complaints we receive are outside of our remit; these are passed on to the relevant authorities or bodies that may be able to assist wherever possible.
The FRC has a centralised complaints function to triage complaints and ensure they are handled, responded to and resolved appropriately, promptly and consistently. In the course of the year, we undertook continuous improvement reviews of all policies, procedures
and processes to ensure that they continue to adapt to the changing needs of both the organisation and complainants, and incorporate good practice.
Following receipt, complaints are triaged to determine whether they fall within our remit and, if they do, they are then referred for consideration to one of the below teams:
Corporate Reporting Review: responsible for reviewing accounts of listed, UK Alternative Investment Market (AIM)-quoted, and large private companies, as well as limited liability partnerships, to determine whether they have complied with relevant accounting and reporting requirements, as set out in the Companies Act 2006.
Case Assessment: responsible for identifying cases that may fall within the remit of one or more of the FRC's disciplinary or enforcement procedures. This includes the Audit Enforcement Procedure (AEP) in relation to suspected breach by statutory auditors
of Relevant Requirements and the Accountancy and Actuarial Schemes, in relation to suspected professional misconduct by members of the chartered accountancy and actuarial bodies in public interest cases. Case Assessment refers to the FRC's Conduct Committee for a decision as to whether to open an investigation by the Enforcement Division under the applicable procedure.
Professional Bodies Supervision: responsible for providing independent oversight of the professional audit, accountancy and actuarial bodies, and considering the way a body has handled a complaint made to it.
Our published policies and complaints forms include clear guidance on how complaints will be dealt with, including timelines.
Complaints in 2025/26
We received 658 complaints during 2025/26, summarised below:
18
Brought forward (within remit)
658
Incoming complaints
Outside remit
549
91
Closed/resolved complaints (within remit)
36
Carried forward (within remit)
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
35
The types of complaint received are broken down below:
48
Conduct or performance of accountant (regulated)
25
Conduct or performance of accountant (unregulated)
87
Conduct or performance of accountant (unknown)
85
Conduct or performance of auditor
Financial reporting
110
Actuarial work
3
Actions of a professional body
197
Insolvency issue
2
94
Other/unknown
FRC
7
The handling timescales across all cases closed in 2025/26 were an average of 1.5 working days to send an acknowledgement and an average of 3.9 working days for the outcome. This includes cases of whistleblowing.
Of the 658 complaints received, 109 were referred to the relevant teams within the FRC for further review, with 549 complaints being outside our remit. The actions taken in respect of the complaints considered by the FRC during 2025/26 are set out below.
Corporate Reporting Review
During the year, 65 complaints were received related to corporate reporting matters and were referred to CRR. 25 of these related to matters or entities that were not within our scope. After careful consideration, 18 were deemed of insufficient merit to pursue. The remaining 22 complaints were pursued.
Complaints received in 2025/26 Not pursued
Entity or matter not in scope
25
Insufficient merit
18
Financial statement related
15
Open
15
3
Improvements secured – notes or/and narrative
3
2
No breach
2
2
Strategic report related
2
Open
The complaints came from a diverse range of parties including private individuals and investors, and related to companies ranging from private and small AIM to FTSE 100. Consistent with our usual practice, and subject to any relevant confidentiality restrictions, information relating to some complaints was shared with, or referred to, other relevant authorities including the FCA.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
36
At the beginning of the year, there were 14 open cases relating to complaints about corporate reporting matters received in earlier years. A total of 11 of these cases have now been closed, three are still open. The actions taken during 2025/26 in relation to these complaints are illustrated below.
Cases brought forward to 1 April 2025 Not pursued
Entity or matter not in scope
2
Insufficient merit
2
Financial statement related
Improvements secured – notes or/and narrative
4
1
Improvements secured – primary financial statement restated
Open
2
No breach
1
Strategic report related
1
Improvements secured – narrative
Open
1
Case Assessment
Case Assessment opened 15 complaint enquiries this year. One complaint was received in relation to a matter for which Case Assessment had an existing enquiry open. 11 complaint enquiries (eight of which were in relation to audit) were closed by the team as our enquiries found that there was no basis or information to support the complaint.
Professional Bodies Supervision
Professional Bodies Supervision (PBS) received 72 complaints about the professional audit, accountancy and actuarial bodies that we supervise. Two complaints were brought forward from the previous year. Of those 74 complaints, the team conducted a full review of the professional bodies' relevant process in 16 of these cases. Ten complaints remain open as of 31 March 2026.
The remaining 48 matters either fell outside the team's complaints handling review remit, or the complainant had not exhausted the professional body's complaints procedure. PBS responded to 92% of complaints within six weeks.
Further information on complaints received by PBS, including trends, can be found in our report on our professional bodies supervision responsibilities for 2025/26, due to be published later this year.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
37
Whistleblowing to the FRC as a prescribed person
Public interest disclosures
Whistleblowing is the term used when a worker passes on information concerning suspected or known wrongdoing, typically within the workplace (also known as ‘making a protected disclosure'). The Employment Rights Act 1996, as amended by the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, provides the legal framework for protecting workers from harm if they blow the whistle. The purpose of a prescribed person is to provide workers with a way of whistleblowing to an independent body that may be able to act on those concerns.
The FRC is a prescribed person under UK whistleblowing legislation. Therefore, individuals working outside the FRC, in the accounting, auditing or actuarial professions, may contact the FRC if they want to make a disclosure about their current or former employer in relation to matters that are within the scope of the FRC's regulatory remit.
During 2025/26, the FRC received 111 disclosures in its capacity as a prescribed person. As a result, we took the following action:
96 related to issues not within the remit of the FRC, so whistleblowers were signposted to the relevant bodies where appropriate.
15 were of direct relevance to the FRC's responsibilities and were considered by our teams.
As with our complaints processes, our whistleblowing procedure is regularly reviewed to ensure cases are dealt with appropriately and responded to promptly. Our published
policies include clear guidance on the types of concerns that can be raised and how cases will be handled.
Complaints about the FRC
During 2025/26, seven new complaints were received about the FRC. No significant issues of wider concern were raised, and the cases were handled under the FRC Complaints Procedure. Two of the concerns raised were regarding dissatisfaction that the FRC could not review a complaint about a professional body until the body's complaints process had been fully exhausted. Internal reviews determined that the complaints were handled in line with our policies and procedures.
The remaining five complaints were related to varying issues that were reviewed and responded to under the complaints process. Again, no issues of wider concern were raised. None of the complainants exercised their right to have their complaint escalated to the Independent Complaints Reviewer.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
38
12.
Financial review
The FRC is reporting a robust financial position in the second year of its 2025/28 strategy, driven by higher-than-forecast levy receipts, effective cost savings and our continued commitment to supporting the Government's agenda.
In March 2025, the FRC Group, comprising the FRC and the UKEB, set an overall budget for 2025/26 of £72.3m. Of this, £67.3m was for operating costs and £5.0m for the estimated costs of enforcement cases.
Our actual overall expenditure in 2025/26 was £65.6m. Actual core operating expenditure for the FRC Group during 2025/26 was £63.0m (£4.3m under budget). The underspend
is primarily driven by leadership attrition and delays in senior recruitment that created longer than expected vacancies, resulting in pay savings. Additional savings arose from business rates refunds and lower than budgeted IT support costs following a successful re-tender. Delays to the ERP programme further reduced planned in-year expenditure,
while conservative assumptions around the office move, particularly the Harbour Exchange relocation and the UKEB's exit from 10 South Colonnade, also contributed to lower overall spending than originally forecast. Our annual budget for audit and accountancy enforcement case costs is based on the estimated costs of cases net of amounts recovered through cost awards. Net case costs in 2025/26 were £2.5m (£2.5m below our estimate of £5.0m).
Total core income for the year was £66.5m, including an extra £0.7m from levy receipts that were as a result of using an enhanced collection approach implemented by our collection agent, Adetiq. We also invoiced the Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies £1.3m less than budgeted to reflect underspends in the departments it funds.
As a result of the overcollection and underspend, we made a surplus of £3.25m that will be transferred to general reserves for use in future years, subject to Department for Business and Trade (DBT) approval.
Despite ongoing macroeconomic volatility in 2025/26, we continue to anticipate both challenges and opportunities across the markets it regulates and remains committed to acting as a modern, agile regulator, while adhering to Managing Public Money principles.
How we manage our operating income and expenditure
Table 1. Core operating expenditure (£m)
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2024/25
2025/26
43.2
51.6
59.6
63.4
63.0
Table 1 shows how the FRC has managed its core operating costs over the past five years. People costs remain the largest proportion of our expenditure.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
39
Table 2. Core operating income (£m)
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2024/25
2025/26
44.5
51.4
58.4
65.6
66.5
Audit firms contribute towards audit supervision work (£18.6m) while the Accountancy Professional Bodies contribute towards audit regulation, professional bodies supervision and part of the enforcement investigation activities (£14.5m). Levies from preparers of accounts contributed £31m during the year, with the remainder (£2.4m) principally from publication income and licences to use FRC products.
Chart 1: Reserves level
16.2
16.0
14.8
16.8
20.0
£m 2021/22
£m 2022/23
£m
2023/24
£m
2024/25
£m 2025/26
Chart 1 depicts our reserves level over the past five years. Year-on-year changes are a result of surpluses and deficits made.
Reserves
At March 2026, the FRC held £20.0m in reserves that are held in FRC bank accounts and can be deployed with DBT consent.
Government Functional Standards
Government Functional Standards set consistent expectations for key business areas, with performance assessed through self-assessment led by internal subject matter experts.
During 2025/26, the Government Functional Standards were significantly refreshed.
A comprehensive self-assessment was completed against the mandatory requirements, providing assurance to the Accounting Officer that the FRC meets most of the standards. Where full compliance has not yet been achieved, clear and proportionate justifications are in place, together with appropriate mitigations. Overall, this assessment confirms robust arrangements are in operation to support effective financial management,
strong counter-fraud controls and sound governance across the organisation.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
40
13.
Risk management
Risk management framework
Our risk management framework is aligned with HM Treasury's Orange Book principles, emphasising a proportionate, pragmatic and evidence-based approach. This supports delivery of our strategic objectives and our wider public interest role. Risks are identified and managed in line with the Board's risk appetite, with structured, risk-based
decision-making embedded in our three-year strategy and Annual Plan and Budget.
A strong risk culture underpins this framework, with a regular programme of training and advice to promote expected behaviours, clear accountability and transparent decision-making across the FRC. This enables colleagues to identify, escalate and manage risks confidently and consistently.
Maintaining an effective risk framework
Our risk and governance structure, built around the ‘three lines' model, underpins our ability to identify, assess and report risks. Internal controls testing and deep dives into our principal risks contribute to well-established risk processes, which are understood and used in day-to-day decision-making. Our 2025 self-assessment found that our overall risk maturity is reliable, repeatable and embedded.
The Board and ExCo review the effectiveness of the risk and internal controls framework through routine reporting for the Audit & Risk Committee. Reviews of policies, risk appetite, risk trends and areas of concern are discussed, with focus this year on data policies and cyber involving Board-level strategy sessions exploring the impact of AI on the FRC. This approach includes the assessment of the organisation's principal risks, set out below, and horizon scanning for emerging risks. The Committee receives assurance on the adequacy of the framework from the second line of defence, while ExCo ensures values, behaviours and policies are embedded to support a resilient risk culture. Oversight from Corporate Services provides the core elements of the second line of defence, ensuring
a cohesive organisational view of risk. Feedback from ExCo, the Audit & Risk Committee and colleagues found that the existing risk methodology felt excessive for an organisation of the FRC's size and stability, so we refreshed the approach to risk management.
With ExCo sponsorship, we have developed a more proportionate and pragmatic way of working, including reassessing our risk landscape and designing a streamlined risk model for implementation in 2026/27. The new approach will empower divisions to take clearer ownership of their risks, strengthen accountability and embed proportionate,
well-evidenced assurance. Assurance mapping, co-designed with business areas, will support this transition and help to ensure risk management is both robust and practical.
Assurance over material controls
In 2025/26, we implemented a proportionate approach to second line assurance, undertaking a programme of internal controls testing. This included a combination of thematic areas identified as opportunities for testing and self-assessment of our functional standards, with no major findings identified. We also consulted across the organisation to define what material controls means within the FRC. We used this to develop our five aggregated material controls and a testing schedule for our approach in 2026/27, in readiness to apply Provision 29 of the UK Corporate Governance Code.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
41
Horizon scanning and emerging risk insight
We use horizon scanning as part of our forward-looking risk management. We draw on external intelligence, market trends and internal analysis to spot emerging risks early and inform our strategic planning. However, we have identified horizon scanning as an area for further development as the FRC is operating in an external environment that is increasingly changeable. Work is underway to enhance our horizon scanning approach by integrating the wider insights generated by our market intelligence and insights work into our new approach.
Board and Audit & Risk Committee
Executive Committee
3rd Line
2nd Line
1st Line
Functions that oversee or specialise in risk management
Internal Audit
Management Control
Internal Control
Measures
Provide independent and objective assurance on governance, risk management and controls frameworks, alongside advice to support their effective operation and management controls
Set the boundaries for delivery through the definition of standards, policies, procedures and guidance
Identify, assess, own and manage risks
Design, implement and maintain effective internal control measures
Assist management in developing controls in line with good practice
Supervise execution and monitor adherence
Support the Audit & Risk Committee and Accounting Officer in their oversight responsibilities
Monitor compliance and effectiveness
Implement corrective actions to address deficiencies
Agree any derogation from defined requirements
Identify and alert senior management, and where appropriate governing bodies, to emerging issues and changing risk scenarios
Independence from management
Responsibility for risk management
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
42
Our principal risk profile
Key
Strategic objective
bjective 1 – The standards and expectations we set will enhance corporate governance, corporate reporting and investor stewardship in a manner that supports UK economic growth and investment.
Objective 2 – Our proportionate regulation of accounting, audit, assurance and actuarial work will expect and encourage high quality by those responsible, acting as an improvement regulator and dealing effectively and fairly with cases where there are significant or serious shortcomings.
Objective 3 – We will build on our deep understanding of corporate reporting and the audit and actuarial markets we oversee, and by being agile, we will identify and prepare for opportunities and challenges on the horizon.
Objective 4 – We will be a modern organisation, considered by others as a respected, effective and highly engaged regulator and by our colleagues as an inclusive and great place to work.
Medium – A moderate threat, but not a critical impact to the strategic objectives.
Risk severity
Low – Unlikely to have a significant impact on the strategic objectives.
Low – Unlikely to have a significant impact on the strategic objectives.
Medium – A moderate threat, but not a critical impact to the strategic objectives.
High – A high likelihood of  substantially affecting the strategic objectives should it occur.
Risk trend
Increase
No change
Decrease
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
43
Stakeholder expectations
Risk description
Risk severity
Changing political and business factors pose a risk to the FRC's reputation, potentially damaging stakeholder trust and confidence. This loss of credibility could hinder the FRC's ability to respond to market changes, engage stakeholders and fulfil its regulatory duties, ultimately affecting its core public interest purpose.
This description has been updated this year to better reflect the current nature of this risk.
Key activities and headlines
Risk trend
The FRC has continued proactive engagement with stakeholders on key initiatives, enabling the organisation to anticipate stakeholder needs and understand the impact of its regulatory activity.
The latest Stakeholder Perceptions Survey shows strong support for the FRC and provides evidence of effective risk management.
Insights gathered through engagement and internal communication channels have helped limit the risk of misalignment with stakeholder priorities. For example, the recently announced call for views on the ISA for Less Complex Entities directly reflects feedback from the SME campaign and demonstrates the FRC's responsiveness.
Key spokespeople across the organisation have amplified these messages, helping position the FRC as an engaged and credible regulator, with positive responses from DBT ministers, business representatives and RSBs.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
44
Influence and implementation of standards and expectations
Risk description
Risk severity
The FRC fails to shape domestic and international accounting, audit and actuarial standards and expectations in line with our needs due to our influencing activity being ineffective (e.g. because we are not engaging the right stakeholders or our arguments are not sufficiently compelling). This could lead to divergence between international and national standards because international standards do not meet the needs of UK stakeholders. This in turn risks undermining the quality of information available for market decision-making or increasing costs and burdens for UK business.
This description has been updated this year to better reflect the current nature of this risk.
Key activities and headlines
Risk trend
International influencing activity continues to focus on ensuring that global standards remain risk-based, proportionate and responsive to the needs of UK stakeholders.
This work is grounded in a strong evidence base, drawing on cross-FRC insights, extensive stakeholder engagement and regular horizon scanning to identify emerging issues and prioritise activity.
The FRC also maintains an ongoing review of its Codes, standards and guidance to ensure they continue to underpin trust and confidence in decision-useful information, high-quality assurance and the effective functioning of UK financial markets. Positions agreed internally are consistently applied and only revisited where there is a clear and evidenced need.
Any proposed changes follow structured internal discussion with relevant stakeholders and subject matter experts. No material deviations have been required since the previous review.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
45
Audit quality and market resilience
Risk description
Risk severity
There is a risk that our supervisory model is not sufficiently effective, risk-based or proportionate, creating a failure to drive audit quality improvements or build firm(s) capability and market resilience, resulting in a lack of confidence in audit and a less sustainable audit market.
Key activities and headlines
The controls for this principal risk continue to operate effectively, supported by regular governance through Supervision's senior leadership team, divisional oversight and an ongoing review of internal papers and regulatory reports for ExCo and the Board.
Clear progress is evident across core areas of Supervision. In PIE auditor registration, enhanced OPM monitoring, improved feedback loops with firms and recent streamlining of the approvals process all support effective risk management. In PIE audit inspection, ongoing dialogue with firms and audit committee chairs confirms that the risk-based programme remains on track.
We have begun phased implementation of a more proportionate and bespoke supervisory approach across the 12 largest firms, with further development planned for 2026/27. The approach has been designed to be scalable, enabling smaller firms to transition to the new model as they exit our Scalebox initiatives.
Data and information management
Risk severity
Risk description
Due to weak data governance and limited awareness of data handling responsibilities, the organisation may fail to protect, manage and leverage its data effectively. This could result in data loss, breach of law/regulation, financial penalties, operational inefficiencies and reputational damage.
Risk trend
Key activities and headlines
This risk has been separated from cybersecurity and now focuses solely on data and information management. It remains a principal risk given the potential for organisation-wide regulatory and operational impact.
Governance has been strengthened through new data classifications, key policy updates (including the FRC Teams chat retention policy) and data storage improvements, such as the contract database.
While Information Asset Owners demonstrate strong divisional accountability, fragmented data architecture exposes the FRC to risk and highlights the need for a more coordinated FRC approach to ensure clear accountability and optimal use of resource.
The Director of IT & Business Services, working with the Head of Legal, will develop an organisation-wide data plan to define the target architecture, set consistent standards and embed a more unified data governance model.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
46
Leadership
Risk description
Risk severity
As a result of poor or inconsistent internal management and leadership, or structures and systems, the FRC fails to adapt to change and deliver on its strategic objectives.
Key activities and headlines
Risk trend
The organisation continues to actively manage this risk, with good progress made over the year.
Senior leadership meetings now operate with a consistent rhythm, supported by a steering group that coordinates agendas and ensures clear visibility of Board debriefs, corporate changes, policies and divisional priorities. This structure has helped to strengthen alignment and improve information flow across the organisation.
The Chief Operating Officer (COO) has proposed an ExCo/senior leadership team working relationship framework, designed to further enhance collaboration across FRC leadership.
In 2026/27, we expect the risk rating to be reduced to a divisional risk with ownership sitting with the COO.
Cybersecurity
Risk description
Risk severity
Due to cybersecurity vulnerabilities and threats, the organisation may be exposed to cyber attacks or system compromise. This could result in data breaches, unauthorised access, legal breaches, financial penalties, reputational damage and operational disruption.
Key activities and headlines
Risk trend
This year we strengthened assurance over our cybersecurity controls through the successful completion of the Cyber Essentials Plus accreditation. This provided external validation that our risk posture remains appropriate.
The team continues to undertake regular, proactive monitoring across the security estate and is supporting a cyber-secure culture through training, strict password enforcement and phishing testing.
We have introduced quarterly IT and security performance reporting to ExCo and the Audit & Risk Committee, improving executive oversight and assurance.
Despite this progress, the risk retains a high residual and target score due to the fast-evolving threat landscape.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
47
Governance
Chair's introduction
14.
I am pleased to present this year's governance section of our annual report, which sets out how the Board and its committees operated during 2025/26. There have been a number of changes to our governance structure over the last year.
Ruwan Weerasekera stepped down from the Board in December 2025. He joined the Board at a time of significant growth and transformation, and over his four and a half years at the FRC, his unique contributions and insight were greatly appreciated, not least of all in his role as non-executive director (NED) responsible for workforce engagement. I want to take this opportunity to again thank him for his dedication to the FRC.
We have also seen a number of changes to our ExCo. Elizabeth Barrett, Executive Director of Enforcement and Executive Counsel, resigned from the FRC in October 2025, and Sarah Rapson, Executive Director of Supervision, left the FRC to take on the role of Chief Executive of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in the same month. We also saw Kate O'Neill, Director of Stakeholder Engagement & Corporate Affairs, leave us in March 2026. While we were sorry to see them leave the FRC, I recognise the great asset that they have been in their time here, and am grateful to them for their commitment, expertise and leadership.
At the same time, I am delighted to have been able to welcome our two new Executive Directors, who joined ExCo in autumn last year. Anthony Barrett, previously FRC Director of Audit Quality Review, took on the role of Executive Director of Supervision in October 2025, and Penrose Foss joined the FRC as Executive Director of Investigations & Enforcement and Executive Counsel in December. We were pleased to see the strength and experience that these appointments added to the organisation as we continue to evolve our regulatory approach and maintain our effectiveness in overseeing the UK's audit and corporate reporting landscape.
I announced my own retirement in February 2026 and will be stepping down in September this year. I am immensely proud of what we have achieved in recent years and of the professionalism, integrity and commitment that I have seen at all levels of the organisation. While the naming of my successor is a matter for DBT, I was pleased that Clare Thompson, our Senior Independent NED, has been invited to play a part in the recruitment process
by serving on the interview panel. This demonstrates DBT's confidence in our Board and ensures that I will be leaving the organisation in good hands.
Sir Jan du Plessis
Chair
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
48
Governance and transparency framework
15.
The FRC is an arm's length body (classified as a central Government non-departmental public body) and a private company limited by guarantee. It reports to the Secretary of State for Business and Trade and to Parliament on the discharge of its functions. The
Secretary of State for Business and Trade appoints the Chair and NEDs to the FRC Board, which is responsible for the FRC's strategy and monitoring its implementation.
Our governance structure is designed to provide the Board with the assurance and confidence that any proposals considered by them take account of the impact on our stakeholder community.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
49
Corporate governance statement
As a private limited company, the UK Corporate Governance Code does not apply to the FRC. However, as the regulator of the Code, the FRC upholds high standards of transparency, accountability and integrity and we align with the principles and provisions of the Code where they are relevant and applicable. As an arm's length body, the FRC also follows the Corporate Governance in Central Government Departments: Code of Good Practice and the Regulators' Code. Areas of departure from these Codes are explained below.
Corporate Governance Code
Engagement with shareholders and stakeholders (Provisions 3 and 4)
As the FRC is a private company limited by guarantee we have no shareholders, but we regularly engage with our stakeholders through a variety of communications and engagement. Further information can be found on page 25 in relation to our Section 172 statement.
Appointments to the Board (Provisions 17 and 18)
As appointments to the Board are a matter for the Secretary of State, the procedure is not directly under the FRC's control. However, the Chair of the Board develops the
candidate brief to support the recruitment campaign and sits on the public appointments recruitment panel to ensure the skills and experience required on the Board are taken into consideration. For Chair appointments, this is done by the Senior Independent Director.
The People Committee also annually considers the balance of competencies to ensure alignment to:
The FRC's purpose and strategic priorities.
The environment in which it operates.
The characteristics, perspectives, independence and diversity of Board members.
Other factors relevant to its effectiveness.
This review informs any recommendations to the Secretary of State in respect of reappointments and the appointments exercise.
The FRC does not have shareholders, therefore members of the Board are not subject to annual shareholder re-election. The terms of appointment are set by the Secretary of State in accordance with the Public Appointments Process.
Audit, risk and internal control (Provision 31)
As an arm's length body under the sponsorship of the Department for Business and Trade, we do not produce a viability statement assessing our prospects over the longer term. The FRC is funded through a levy and we have a robust process in place to collect this. However, the FRC receives a Letter of Comfort from DBT that provides assurance of financial support.
Furthermore, in preparing the Financial Statements, the Board has assessed the appropriateness of the going concern basis of accounting. This assessment has taken into account the Group's financial position, principal risks and a Letter of Comfort from DBT.
Remuneration (Provisions 32, 33, 36-38)
The FRC does not have a Remuneration Committee or shareholders. The People Committee has responsibility to consider submissions in respect of employee pay awards and to advise the Secretary of State on the proposed fees for NEDs.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
50
Our Board and committees
16.
The Board is responsible for the strategic direction and supervision of the FRC, regularly reviewing operational plans and financial performance. It is also responsible for managing, assessing and mitigating risk. The Board is comprised of the Chair,
Chief Executive and seven NEDs (formerly eight until December 2025). The Board has delegated functions under the enforcement and disciplinary procedures to the Conduct Committee. It met eight times in 2025/26.
The roles of the Chair and the Chief Executive are held separately, ensuring a clear separation of responsibilities in line with the UK Corporate Governance Code. The Chair leads the Board and ensures its effectiveness through the management of Board meetings, agenda setting and supporting the optimisation of Board discussions. The Chair also takes a leading role in Board succession planning and ensuring effective communication with stakeholders.
As the Accounting Officer, the Chief Executive is personally responsible for safeguarding the public funds under their control, ensuring propriety and value for money in the handling of those public funds and the day-to-day operation and management of the FRC. The Chief Executive has a responsibility to the Permanent Secretary for Business and Trade as the Principal Accounting Officer for all public bodies in the DBT family, who delegates powers directly to the Chief Executive through a Framework Agreement.
In the financial year 2025/26, the Board discharged its responsibilities through Reserved Powers and through its Board committees, as outlined in the Governance Handbook.
The committees are composed of NEDs and are assisted by Senior Advisers who are subject matter experts and act as a sounding board for ongoing issues and topics. Representatives from the National Audit Office (NAO) and the Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) attend meetings of the Audit & Risk Committee. The biographies of all members of the governance structure, the Reserved Powers of the Board and the Terms of Reference for each committee, together with a summary of Board business, can be found in the Structure section of our website.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
51
Company Secretary
The Board and its committees have access to an appropriately qualified and experienced Company Secretary who provides independent advice on governance matters. They are responsible for working with the Chair, Chief Executive and ExCo to develop the agendas for Board and committee meetings and ensuring all governance procedures are complied with. The removal and appointment of the Company Secretary is a matter reserved for the Board.
Transparency
The FRC reports to the Secretary of State for Business and Trade and Parliament on the discharge of its statutory functions and lays its Annual Report and Accounts before Parliament.
Board appointments, diversity and succession planning
Appointments to the Board are made by the Secretary of State for Business and Trade in accordance with the Public Appointments Process. The Chief Executive is a permanent employee, and members of the Board are subject to three-year appointments, except the Chair, who is appointed for a four-year term. Following the announcement of Sir Jan du Plessis' intention to retire as Chair of the Board from 30 September 2026, a public appointment recruitment process was initiated with DBT. The FRC has also engaged Odgers Berndtson as the executive search firm to support this process.
The Board Diversity Policy sets out the Board's support for the Government's ambitions for diversity, and its commitment to work with the Secretary of State in pursuit of the Government's objectives. The Board annually reviews its skills matrix and succession plans throughout the year.
Board induction and training
All Board members continued to receive bespoke training on various matters throughout the year.
Independence and conflicts
The FRC attaches special importance to avoiding any potential conflict between the work and values of the FRC and the personal interests of our people, NEDs and advisers. Please see more on our compliance on page 31.
Key Board matters 2025/26
Board meeting agendas are curated in advance by the Chair, Chief Executive and the Executive team to ensure an appropriate balance between strategic and operational matters. The Board agenda includes a report from the Chief Executive on important operational matters, and the Board regularly receives key information on the delivery of the strategy, finances, risks, HR matters and the internal control environment.
The Chairs of the Audit & Risk, People and Conduct committees update the Board on the proceedings of their meetings, including key discussion points and matters for approval. For more detail, please see the reports on the individual committees on pages 65-71.
The Board assesses, constructively challenges and considers the Executive's proposals and matters for decision to ensure they are aligned with the FRC's strategy and purpose. The focus of the Board's business throughout the year can be assessed through the lens of the seven broad themes outlined on pages 58-59. The Board and Executive are assisted by Senior Advisers who are subject matter experts.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
52
Board members (as of 31 March 2026)
Key to Committees
AR
Audit & Risk
P
Sir Jan du Plessis
People
Chair
Richard Moriarty
Chief Executive Officer and Accounting Officer
C
P
Conduct
Appointed
3 February 2022
03 February 2022
Attendance: 8/8
Appointed
2 October 2023
02 October 2023
Attendance: 8/8
Bold and black keyline denotes Chair of the Committee
Experience
Sir Jan had a career in business, including serving over a period of 18 years as Chair of various public companies: BT Group plc (2017 to 2021); Rio Tinto
Experience
Richard has over 25 years of Board-level experience across a range of regulated sectors. Prior to joining the FRC, he was CEO of the UK's Civil Aviation Authority and before that the
Full biographical details of each director are available at www.frc.org.uk
plc (2009 to 2018); SABMiller
plc (2014 to 2016); RHM plc
CEO of the Legal Services Board, which oversees the regulation of the legal professions. Earlier in his career he held senior roles in the regulation of social housing, communications and energy. He has also held roles in the private sector, such as director of a water company and partner
(2005 to 2007); and British American Tobacco plc (2004 to 2009). These roles have given him extensive experience in leadership and the governance of some major public companies. He has also had multiple interactions with the institutional investment community and gained meaningful insight into the challenges facing the audit services sector.
for a consultancy.
In a non-executive capacity, he was Deputy Chair of the Social Housing Regulator, responsible for the governance and financial viability of social landlords.
Sir Jan has also served as NED of Marks and Spencer Group plc and Lloyds Banking Group plc.
Outside of the FRC, Richard is Chair of a housing association.
From 1988 to 2004 he was CFO of Richemont.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2024/25
53
Key to Committees
AR
Clare Thompson
Senior Independent
Non-Executive Director
Angela Cha
Audit & Risk
Independent Non-Executive Director
P
People
C
AR
P
P
C
Conduct
Appointed
1 February 2022
01 February 2022
Attendance: 8/8
Appointed
1 February 2022
01 February 2022
Attendance: 8/8
Bold and black keyline denotes Chair of the Committee
Experience
Experience
Angela is a solicitor by profession and a former partner of Pinsent Masons, where she spent two decades of her legal career.
Clare retired from PwC in 2011, having been a partner for 23 years. At PwC she was Audit/ Lead Partner on major financial services groups and served
She specialised in advising financial services sector clients, initially on the development and outsourcing of technology but increasingly on business change and transformation projects.
Full biographical details of each director are available at www.frc.org.uk
as UK Insurance Leader and a member of the UK Assurance executive team.
Since leaving PwC, she has built a portfolio of non-executive roles and has served as Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Audit Committee at Bupa,
Angela's management roles included Integration Partner following the merger to form Pinsent Masons and Joint Head of the firm's financial services sector practice.
Chair of the Audit Committee of Bupa's UK insurance business, a NED of Direct Line Insurance Group plc, a NED of Retail Charity Bonds plc, Chair of the Audit Committee of Miller Insurance Services LLP and Treasurer of the Disasters Emergency Committee.
Since retiring from the partnership in 2010, Angela has pursued her legal career on a consulting basis, combining this with a non-executive career in the mutual sector (at the Bath Building Society where she
Clare is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW).
was deputy Chair and Senior Independent Director) and the third sector (at the NSPCC where she was a co-opted member of the Audit & Risk Committee).
Clare is a Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Audit Committee at M&G plc.
Angela is a NED at the Saffron Building Society.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2024/25
54
Key to Committees
AR
David Willis
Hannah Nixon
Independent Non-Executive
Director
Audit & Risk
Independent Non-Executive Director
P
People
C
P
P
AR
C
Appointed
1 February 2022
01 February 2022
Attendance: 8/8
Conduct
Appointed
24 June 2021
24 June 2021
Attendance: 8/8
Experience
Bold and black keyline denotes Chair of the Committee
Experience
David is a solicitor by profession and was a partner in international law firm Herbert Smith Freehills (and predecessor firm Herbert Smith) for many years. He was Managing Partner of Herbert Smith from 2008 to 2012 and Joint CEO of Herbert Smith Freehills from 2012 to 2014.
Hannah has widespread experience in economic regulation across a range of industries. She brings significant experience of developing, implementing and enforcing regulatory regimes and influencing public policy. She was the first CEO of the Payment Systems Regulator, the economic regulator of the UK's £80tn payments industry, responsible for driving competition and innovation in the interests of consumers. She was also a senior partner at Ofgem, where she had responsibility for the networks division.
Full biographical details of each director are available at www.frc.org.uk
He was previously a member of the governing body of Queen Mary University of London, where he chaired the Audit & Risk Committee, a member of the Board of the Solicitors Regulation Authority, where he chaired the Finance & Audit Committee,
and a member of the Law Society Group Audit Committee. He was Vice Chair of United Response,
Hannah is currently Chair of the Single Source Regulations Office, the UK regulator for non-competitive defence procurement, Chair of the Retail Energy Codes Company, and a NED of the National Energy System Operator and Worldpay UK.
a charity supporting adults with learning disabilities, where he chaired the Finance & Resources Committee. He stood down as Chair of Paradigm Trust, a multi-academy trust, in January 2026.
55
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2024/25
Key to Committees
AR
Charlie Parker Independent Non-Executive Director
Audit & Risk
Simon O'Regan Independent Non-Executive Director
P
P
C
P
C
People
C
Appointed
28 November 2024
28 November 2024
Attendance: 7/8
Conduct
Appointed
28 November 2024
28 November 2024
Attendance: 8/8
Experience
Experience
Charlie was previously Chief Executive and Head of the Public Service for the Government of Jersey. Prior
Bold and black keyline denotes Chair of the Committee
Simon has over 40 years' experience in the insurance, pensions and asset management industries. He is a UK Chartered Actuary and has lived and worked in six countries around the world including as CEO
to this, he was Chief Executive of Westminster City Council and Chief Executive of Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council. During his various roles as a Chief Executive, Charlie oversaw the significant transformation and modernisation of a large
Full biographical details of each director are available at www.frc.org.uk
of Mercer in Australia, in the UK, in Europe and in the USA/ Canada. Simon was formerly a NED of Alexander Forbes Group Holdings Ltd. Simon was a member of the UK's Nuclear Liabilities Financing
number of public services, often resulting in reduced costs and improved performance.
Charlie is a NED of NewRiver REIT plc, where he is Chair of the Remuneration Committee and a member of the Challenge Board overseeing the Buckingham Palace Reservicing Project.
Assurance Board and served as a non-executive member of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office's Audit & Risk Assurance Committee.
Charlie is also a Director and Trustee at Griffin Investors Ltd.
Simon is the Chair of Impax Asset Management Group plc.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2024/25
56
Ruwan Weerasekera was appointed to the Board on
Key to Committees
21 June 2021
21 June 2021
and resigned on
4 December 2025.
AR
Eva Lindholm
Audit & Risk
Independent Non-Executive Director
P
People
AR
P
C
Appointed 28 November 2024 Attendance: 8/8
Conduct
Experience
Bold and black keyline denotes Chair of the Committee
Eva has had a broad executive career in the financial services industry, having worked at
J.P. Morgan for 27 years and UBS for 12 years. She has significant leadership experience in investment banking, corporate banking and wealth management,
Full biographical details of each director are available at www.frc.org.uk
across several geographies and markets. She has served on the Board of Transport for London, including on its Finance & Policy Committee, and on the UK Government's Investment Council. Eva has also served as the Chair of the UBS Optimus Foundation UK.
Eva is a NED at CapMan, a Nasdaq Helsinki-listed and headquartered private equity investor, and SEB (the former Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken), a Nasdaq Stockholm-listed and headquartered wholesale bank.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2024/25
57
The Senior Advisers provide advice, feedback and mentoring and act as sounding boards for ongoing issues and topics.
Theme
Key areas of focus for the Board in 2025/26
Strategy and operations
Noted the announcement from Government regarding audit reform legislation.
Supported the Senior Independent Director and DBT in the commencement of recruitment of a new Chair, following the announcement of the retirement of Sir Jan du Plessis.
Approved the FRC Annual Report and Accounts 2024/25.
Approved the FRC's Plan and Budget for 2026/27.
Received regular updates from the Chief Executive and Executive team in respect of the Plan and Budget, key risks, OPMs, the operating environment and forward planning priorities.
Approved the UKEB Due Process Oversight report to the Secretary of State.
Discussed Executive succession plans and supported the recruitment of two new members of ExCo.
Considered Audit Market and Competition developments.
Regulatory standards and codes
Approved the publication of the 2025 Stewardship Code and Feedback Statement.
Approved the Annual Report on Corporate Reporting.
Approved the publication of Amendments to Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework – 2024/25 cycle.
Approved the publication of Amendments to FRS 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland – Adapted formats.
Approved the publication of the Actuarial Standards Technical Memorandum 1 (ASTM1), along with the ‘Feedback Statement and Impact Assessment: AS TM1: Statutory Money Purchase Illustrations'.
Agreed the commencement of work to facilitate the launch of a Voluntary Register for Sustainability Assurance Practitioners.
Received regular updates on the regulatory standards and codes divisional activities, international standard setting activities and the FRC's international standard setting strategy.
Noted the Technical Actuarial Guidance to help pension scheme actuaries provide retrospective confirmation to validate historic changes to pension scheme rules.
Approved the issuance of several consultation documents relating to developing or updating regulatory standards and codes.
Approved amendments to ISA 240 (UK) and 540 UK Standards.
Considered Practice Note 28 to provide guidance for audits of small and medium-sized entities.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
58
Theme
Key areas of focus for the Board in 2025/26
Supervision
Agreed a revised supervisory approach as a result of FASS.
Approved the publication of the Annual Review of Audit Quality.
Approved the publication of the 2025 Crown Dependencies Annual Report.
Approved the Professional Body Oversight Report to the Secretary of State.
Approved the Independent Supervisor's Report on the Auditors General to the Secretary of State.
Approved changes to the PIE Auditor Registration Regulations.
Enforcement and Investigations
Received regular updates on the activities of the Enforcement Division and Conduct Committee activities.
Approved the End-to-End Enforcement Review consultation and considered the feedback from stakeholders.
Engagement with stakeholders and colleagues
Received regular updates from the Stakeholder Engagement & Corporate Affairs team on how the FRC engages with
its stakeholders.
Considered feedback from the stakeholder perceptions survey.
Maintaining good governance
Approved commissioning of the 2026 Board Performance Review.
Reviewed the Gifts and Hospitality Policy and Conflicts of Interest Policy.
Approved amendments to the Governance Handbook.
Approved the FRC's Modern Slavery Statement.
Finance, risk and operations
Discussed the FRC's financial performance and monitored operational matters.
Received regular updates from the Audit & Risk Committee on the internal and external audit plan, internal controls and financial management.
Provided input and constructive challenge to support ongoing development of the risk management framework, considered emerging and principal risks and received assurance that the risk and control environment is effective.
Agreed the procurement of new ERP tools to support our financial and HR systems.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
59
Board performance review
The Board undertakes an annual review of its own and its committees' effectiveness, with a formal externally facilitated effectiveness review carried out at least every three years in accordance with the Corporate Governance Code. This year's review was internally facilitated by the Chair and supported by the Company Secretary. It comprised a Board and Committee questionnaire, alongside individual discussions with each director. In addition, the Senior Independent Director met with NEDs, in the absence of the Chair, to
consider the Chair's performance, and subsequently provided collective feedback directly to the Chair.
The Board reviewed progress against the actions arising from last year's review, noting the completion of actions focused on strengthening risk management, enhancing discussion of emerging issues and trends within the audit market, and making greater use of horizon scanning to support consideration of emerging risks.
The Board approved an action plan arising from this year's effectiveness review covering both Board and committee actions. Key priorities for the year ahead include:
Succession planning: refreshing the ExCo succession plan with clearer pipelines and risk mitigations, reflecting recent changes to its composition.
Internal audit: strengthening internal audit capability, including the timeliness of delivery.
Risk management: further maturing the effectiveness of the internal control framework and improving the articulation and practical application of risk appetite.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
60
Our Executive Committee
17.
The Chief Executive, as Accounting Officer, is personally responsible for implementing the strategy agreed by the Board, the use of public funds in delivering this strategy, and the day-to-day running of the FRC. The CEO is supported in this role by an Executive Committee. It meets weekly to discuss operational, strategic, financial, reputational and workforce matters in support of the day-to-day running of the organisation and to further the objectives established by the Board.
Key areas of focus for the Committee
Strategy: including the development of the Strategy and Plan and Budget. The Committee also monitors progress against agreed objectives.
Operational: including reports from the Chief Operating Officer and Finance Director on management accounts, procurement, IT (including cybersecurity), OPM reporting and office management matters.
Risks and internal controls: in addition to routine risk reports, the Committee engages in deep dives into the FRC's principal risks and considers the effectiveness of the FRC's internal control and risk management framework.
People: including key people-related policies, FRC culture, colleague survey results and hybrid working arrangements.
Stakeholder engagement: including consideration of feedback on key stakeholder matters and responses to FRC publications. This informs our future policy work and offers insight into possible future issues and areas of work. The Committee also focuses on internal communications and messaging.
Policy: including both internal and external policy positions.
During the year, Sarah Rapson, Executive Director of Supervision, Kate O'Neill, Director of Stakeholder Engagement & Corporate Affairs, and Elizabeth Barrett, Executive Counsel and Executive Director of Enforcement, resigned from the FRC.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
61
Executive Committee members (as of 31 March 2026)
Mark Babington
Executive Director of
Regulatory Standards
Richard Moriarty
Chief Executive Officer,
Statutory Director and Accounting Officer
Role
Richard leads the executive team and is responsible for the implementation of the FRC's strategy. As Accounting Officer, he ensures the FRC is run in accordance
Role
Mark leads the division responsible for the FRC's technical and public policy work covering audit, corporate reporting, corporate governance and stewardship, actuarial and digital reporting and taxonomies. Prior to joining ExCo, Mark led the FRC's UK Audit Policy programme,
with the Framework Agreement from DBT, the requirements of the Managing Public Money principles, and any additional instructions and guidance issued from time to time by DBT, HM Treasury and the Cabinet Office, while maintaining the FRC's position as an independent regulator.
implementing measures to support greater competition in the UK audit market and work to support the reform of international standard setting for auditors, by global regulatory authorities.
For details of Richard's experience, see page 53.
Mark has previous experience as a Board Member and Audit & Risk Committee Chair. He is also a member of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA), which sets the global Code of Ethics for the accountancy profession, and chairs IESBA's Sustainability Task Force. Before he joined the FRC, Mark had a 20-year career in audit and was a Director at the UK NAO.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
62
Anthony Barrett
Executive Director of Supervision
Penrose Foss
Appointed
Executive Director of Investigations & Enforcement and Executive Counsel
20 October 2025
Role
Role
Anthony leads the FRC's supervisory functions across the UK audit market, including oversight of audit firms, professional bodies and corporate reporting by large businesses. He contributes to the strategic direction and delivery of the FRC's public interest mandate in support of UK economic growth. He also acts as the executive's most senior adviser to the FRC
Penrose joined the FRC in 2025, leading the Enforcement division's teams of forensic accountants and lawyers operating across the FRC's enforcement regimes.
Penrose has extensive experience of investigations and litigation drawn from the private sector and Government, with particular expertise in the conduct of large, complex regulatory investigations and dispute resolution involving auditors, accountants and actuaries.
Board and its committees on supervision-related matters.
Penrose sits as a First-tier Tribunal Judge of the General Regulatory Chamber.
Previously, Anthony was the Director of Audit Quality Review at the FRC, responsible for overseeing the delivery
of audit inspection work. With colleagues, he also supported the broader supervision of audit firms and the audit market.
Anthony is a Chartered Public Finance Accountant and a Certified Fraud Examiner.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
63
Vinita Hill
Chief Operating Officer
Miranda Craig
Director of Strategy & Change
Role
Vinita joined the FRC in January 2025, leading the Corporate Services division. As a member of ExCo she oversees Finance, Procurement, HR, Information Systems, and Facilities and Estate Management.
Role
Miranda joined the FRC in March 2020, initially with responsibility for delivering the transformation programme, and
now the FRC's wider change agenda. The Strategy & Change directorate includes the Market Intelligence & Insights and Stakeholder Engagement & Corporate Affairs teams, supplying the FRC with strategic enabling functions across economic and data analysis, competition expertise, research, communications and stakeholder engagement.
Previously, Vinita served as Director of Corporate Operations at the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), where she led a team
of 40 people and was the first Director to be based regionally. She managed the organisation's £41m budget, while developing the ORR's first Environmental Strategy and in 2024, refreshed its Diversity and Inclusion Strategy.
Having qualified as a chartered company secretary while at Ernst & Young, Miranda has over 20 years of governance experience across professional services, large private and listed companies. She has also held senior secretariat roles at various large private and FTSE-listed groups. Miranda spent 2019 seconded
With over 20 years of public sector leadership experience, including significant time at Highways England as Performance and Change Director and Designated Funds Director, Vinita has expertise in strategic leadership and organisational transformation. She holds a Post Graduate Certificate in Leadership & Management and an LLB Honours
to the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, leading on the Independent Review into the Quality and Effectiveness of Audit, supporting Sir Donald Brydon's comprehensive review of audit; its purpose, user
Law Degree.
needs and future direction.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
64
18.
Conduct Committee report
I am pleased to present the Conduct Committee report for the year ended 31 March 2026, which provides an overview of the work of the Committee and the key matters it addressed over the year. The Conduct Committee's work involves careful consideration. It must balance the impact of its decisions on firms and individuals who work in the highly technical, and often challenging, profession of accounting, auditing and actuarial work against the FRC's purpose to protect the public interest, uphold the standards the market expects and relies upon, and hold to account the few who fall below those standards.
In 2025/26, we opened seven investigations. While the number of investigations opened each year has been declining since 2023/24, there are a number of underlying factors that may impact the number opened in any year. It is too early to assess whether the trend seen over recent years of a reducing number of investigations being opened has reversed. Audit quality has improved across most of the larger firms and we continue to work with those firms on the PIE Audit Register that undertake smaller numbers of PIE audits to help them enhance their audit quality.
There are 25 investigations open as of 31 March 2026, compared with 32 as of 31 March 2025. Key activities considered by the Committee this year included:
Overseeing the work of the Case Assessment team: receiving regular updates on the nature and number of enquiries being opened and closed by the Case Examiner.
Enforcement case review: looking at information presented by the Case Examiner, Legal Services team and Executive Counsel to support its decision-making role, ensuring thorough discussion and scrutiny of that information.
Accountancy and actuarial schemes: considering matters under the Schemes.
Enforcement Committee: overseeing submission to the Enforcement Committee on matters under the Auditor Regulatory Sanctions Procedure and the Crown Dependency Recognised Auditor Sanctions Procedure, which are used for local authority audits and Crown Dependency audits respectively.
Risk management: emerging issues, risks or delays relating to open investigations.
OPMs and milestones: how the progress of investigations is measured and monitored.
Publication of enforcement-related matters: the timing and content of certain enforcement-related publications.
Succession planning: recruiting a new Senior Adviser.
Budget approvals: review and approval of budgets for investigations and enforcement.
Committee effectiveness review: conducting an annual review of the Committee's effectiveness.
E2E: the Committee played an active, influential role in shaping the review, participating in a dedicated project team led workshop and providing strategic input to support the development of a more integrated, modernised enforcement process.
David Willis
Chair of the Conduct Committee
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
65
Role of the Committee
The Conduct Committee is responsible for the oversight of the FRC's enquiries, investigations and enforcement function, ensuring that appropriate cases are investigated and conducted fairly, in the public interest, in a timely manner and in accordance with due process and the Regulators' Code.
The Committee met eleven times in 2025/26.
Membership and attendance
Members
Attendance
David Willis (Chair)
11/11
11/11
Angela Cha (Deputy Chair)
7/11
Charlie Parker*
8/11
Simon O'Regan*
Senior Advisers
11/11
Anne Whitaker
11/11
David Snell
10/11
Richard Lawrence
*Charlie Parker and Simon O'Regan joined the Committee on 1 April 2025 but were unable to attend all meetings due to pre-existing diary commitments that pre-dated their appointments.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
66
19.
Audit & Risk Committee report
I am pleased to present the Audit & Risk Committee report for the year ended March 2026, which provides an overview of the work of the Committee and the key matters it addressed over the year. The Committee continues to support the Board in its review of the integrity of financial reporting and ensures that risk management and internal controls remain robust and appropriately managed.
Key activities considered by the Committee this year included:
Reviewing the risk management framework: identifying improvements, continuing to build out the assurance mapping process and adopting a renewed approach, focusing on broader themes to provide greater oversight and assurance, evaluating the principal risks and the organisation's risk profile.
Reviewing and approving the material controls: considering planned activities, the assurance plan and the deep dive schedule for reporting against Provision 29 of the Corporate Governance Code 2024 at 31 March 2027.
Quarterly updates: on IT and information security.
Annual Report and Accounts: reviewing and recommending to the Board.
GIAA audit: receiving regular reports from the GIAA on the result of its audits and agreeing its 2026/27 plan.
Oversight of the activities of the internal audit function and external auditors: including an evaluation of their effectiveness based on the Committee's own interaction with the internal and external auditors, as well as a questionnaire with key internal stakeholders.
Approved updates to the Fraud Prevention and Bribery & Anti-Corruption Policies: aligning with the requirements of failure to prevent fraud under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023.
Committee effectiveness review: reviewed its own effectiveness as part of the internal Board and committee performance review.
The Committee also receives regular and relevant updates from the Finance team to ensure that the FRC has complied with its obligations as set out in Managing Public Money. In 2026/27, the focus will remain on strengthening our risk management approach and internal controls. Priority areas include cybersecurity, data and information management and AI governance risks. The Committee will continue to use deep dive sessions to support discussion on key topics and monitor emerging risks through horizon scanning. Downside scenario planning will also be used to test organisational resilience and inform the assessment of key risks.
Clare Thompson
Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
67
Role of the Committee
The Audit & Risk Committee supports and advises the Accounting Officer (the Chief Executive) and the Board through:
providing oversight of the financial reporting process and use of public funds
corporate governance
the external and internal audit process
the system of internal controls
information technology
the identification and management of significant risks
compliance with laws and regulations.
The Committee held five meetings in the 2025/26 financial year. In addition, it met with the external and internal auditors (without the presence of management) from the NAO and GIAA respectively.
The Committee is composed of individuals with recent and relevant audit, risk and financial experience, both in the private and public sectors and listed environments. The Chair, Clare Thompson, is an ICAEW Chartered Accountant and former Audit Partner, with non-executive experience including as an Audit Committee Chair.
Michael Hearty, Senior Adviser, is also appointed to the Committee and brings a public sector finance background, including experience of organisations undergoing transformation.
With these appointments, the Board is satisfied that the combined knowledge and financial experience of the Committee members ensured it could fulfil its responsibilities effectively.
Membership and attendance
Members
Attendance
Clare Thompson (Chair)
5/5
5/5
Eva Lindholm
5/5
Hannah Nixon
3/4
Ruwan Weerasekera1
Senior Advisers
5/5
Michael Hearty (FCPFA)
1 Ruwan Weerasekera resigned from the Committee on 4 December 2025.
Other regular attendees at the Audit & Risk Committee meetings included the FRC Chair, Accounting Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Finance Director, Director of Legal Services, Head of Risk, NAO and GIAA.
External auditor independence
The NAO was appointed as external auditor in 2019. Eleanor Parker was appointed as Senior Statutory Auditor in October 2025. She has no conflicts of interest. Eleanor is not part of the NAO's Central Quality team, nor is she responsible for PIE audits inspected by the FRC. The Board reviews how the relationship and any potential conflicts of interest between the NAO and the FRC are mitigated each year prior to appointing the FRC's external auditors. To protect the objectivity and independence of the external auditor,
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
68
it is the FRC's policy that it is not contracted to carry out any non-audit services and no such services were provided during the financial year.
Financial reporting
The Committee reviewed and recommended to the Board the Annual Report and Accounts for the financial year ended 31 March 2026, having confirmed that it satisfied all applicable legal and regulatory obligations. The Committee also considered the letter of support issued by DBT to the FRC and the letter of representation issued to the auditors, and received the auditors' ISA (UK) 260 report setting out any matters arising from the audit.
The Committee concluded that the Financial Statements should continue to be prepared on the going concern basis of accounting, given DBT's Letter of Comfort.
Fair, balanced and understandable
In assessing whether the Annual Report and Accounts are fair, balanced and understandable on behalf of the Board, the Audit & Risk Committee considered:
The information contained within the Strategic Report, ensuring it represents a fair reflection of performance during the year under review.
Key judgement areas, accounting and reserves policies.
The key messages in the Annual Report, ensuring they are clear, consistent and easily understood.
Internal audit opinion 2025/26
A key source of independent assurance for the FRC is the internal audit function provided by the GIAA, which complies with the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards. It provides the Accounting Officer and the Audit & Risk Committee with an annual opinion on the adequacy and effectiveness of the organisation's control environment. The internal audit programme of work aligns closely with the organisation's principal risks and strategic objectives, providing a balanced view and coverage of the business.
The GIAA provided an overall ‘moderate' opinion on the framework of governance, risk management and control for 2025/26. This rating is in line with last year, with the GIAA's view being that the FRC continues to make incremental improvements to its control environment. The risk management maturity level shows repeatable processes and defined roles, with some elements going beyond this and showing signs of being integrated into the business, as identified during the audit of risk management this year. The recommendations from that audit supported the planned changes to be delivered as part of our new risk approach, explained further in section 13.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
69
20.
People Committee report
I am pleased to present the People Committee report for the financial year ended 31 March 2026, which provides an overview of the work of the Committee and the key matters it has addressed over the year. The Committee supports the Board in
discharging its responsibilities, which include key Board appointments, remuneration, succession planning and talent management.
Key activities considered by the Committee this year include:
Succession planning: including recruitment of the Executive Counsel, Executive Director of Supervision and senior advisers.
Consideration of the talent review process: including for senior leadership roles.
Annual employee pay review.
Consideration of the annual People Survey: including discussion and review of the outcome.
Updates from the Designated Workforce Director: covering discussions held at the People Forum.
Regular updates from the Chief People Officer on HR matters: including learning and development opportunities being offered to our people.
Consideration of a new performance evaluation framework: applicable for all employees.
The 2025/27 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Strategy: including consideration and endorsement.
Committee effectiveness review: reviewed its own effectiveness as part of the internal Board and committee performance review.
Internal governance independence requirements: review and approval.
Gifts and Hospitality Policy: review and approval of changes to the policy.
Gifts and Hospitality Register and Register of Interests: review of both for Board members, ExCo and senior advisers (bi-annually).
Quarterly publication of expenses: approval of publications for Board and ExCo members.
Sir Jan du Plessis
Chair of the People Committee
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
70
Role of the Committee
The Committee provides strategic direction on issues relating to the appointment and recruitment, remuneration, talent management and welfare of FRC colleagues and non-executive members and advisers. The NED with responsibility for workforce engagement regularly reports into this Committee to improve visibility of people matters at Board and Committee level. The Committee met five times in 2025/26.
Membership and attendance
Members
Attendance
Jan du Plessis (Chair)
5/5
5/5
Angela Cha
5/5
Clare Thompson
4/5
Charlie Parker
5/5
David Willis
5/5
Eva Lindholm
5/5
Hannah Nixon
5/5
Simon O'Regan
3/4
Ruwan Weerasekera1
1 Ruwan Weerasekera resigned from the Committee on 4 December 2025.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
71
21.
Remuneration report
The Chief Executive is the only executive member of the Board. The performance of the Chief Executive and the Executive Directors are assessed against both collective objectives, set in line with the FRC Plan and Budget, and individual objectives.
An overview of the remuneration framework applied to all our people during 2025/26 is set out below. The main components of the Chief Executive and the Executive Directors' remuneration are consistent with this framework unless indicated otherwise.
Element and purpose
Opportunity/ output
Operation
Base salary
Salaries are reviewed annually. The Chief Executive and ExCo members approve the annual pay principles that drive the annual compensation plan for the FRC, subject to final approval by DBT. The People Committee is also consulted. The overall budget for pay is aligned with the UK Government annual pay remit.
Any annual increase awarded reflects the individual's role, their performance, movement in market rates
To provide core remuneration for the role, recognising the responsibility for setting and delivering the annual FRC Plan and Budget.
and increasing competency within their role.
The People Committee approves the remuneration of the Chief Executive and other Executive Directors, subject to final approval by DBT, taking account of their responsibilities, performance and experience, alongside market
trends and any relevant comparators. The overall budget for pay is aligned to the UK Government Senior Civil Service Pay Guidance.
Any salary adjustment for the Chief Executive was subject to Government approval.
Benefits
All colleagues offered employment prior to
1 June 2018, are eligible to receive benefits that may include:
To provide a competitive and cost effective benefits package in line with public sector norms.
Dental insurance
Private health insurance
Income protection insurance
Life insurance
In aligning the FRC's remuneration policy more closely with the public sector, new joiners who started from 1 June 2018 are no longer eligible for dental or private health insurance.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
72
Element and purpose
Opportunity/ output
Operation
Pension benefits
All colleagues are eligible to participate in the group personal pension scheme, which is a Defined Contribution scheme.
A maximum of 10% of base salary.
To provide competitive retirement benefits in line with relevant market comparators.
Colleagues offered employment prior to 1 June 2018 were able to elect to take pay in lieu of pension contributions less an amount equivalent to National Insurance contributions, but this has been discontinued for employees offered employment after 1 June 2018.
Non-consolidated pay
The FRC provides a modest cash award to all eligible employees with qualifying service and personal performance reflecting the overall performance of the FRC during the year.
An in-year award of £1,300 was made to
all qualifying employees.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
73
22.
Remuneration framework: pay multiples and director remuneration
The following table provides details of the remuneration and pension interests of the most senior management of the FRC. As a limited company, this comprises the registered directors. The totals for 2024/25 have been restated to show the applicable bandings for the actual amounts reported.
Single total figure of directors' remuneration (subject to audit)
Non-executive directors
Total
Benefits1 to nearest £100
Fees £'000
£'000
2025/26
2024/25
2025/26
2024/25
2025/26
2024/25
Sir Jan du Plessis
120-125
120-125
-
-
120-125
120-125
Angela Cha
15-20
15-20
-
-
15-20
15-20
Eva Lindholm (from 28/11/2024)
15-20
5-10
-
-
15-20
5-10
Hannah Nixon
15-20
15-20
500
-
15-20
15-20
Simon O'Regan (from 28/11/2024)
15-20
5-10
-
-
15-20
5-10
Charlie Parker (from 28/11/2024)
15-20
5-10
1,500
-
15-20
5-10
Clare Thompson
25-30
25-30
-
-
25-30
25-30
Ruwan Weerasekera (to 04/12/2025)
10-15
15-20
-
-
10-15
15-20
David Willis
25-30
25-30
-
-
25-30
25-30
Executive directors (Richard Moriarty, Chief Executive Officer)
Salary 2
Benefits3 to nearest £100
Bonus
Total
Pension4 to nearest £'000
£'000
£'000
£'000
2025/26
2024/25
2025/26
2024/25
2025/26
2024/25
2025/26
2024/25
2025/26
2024/25
0-5
0-5
2,500
3,000
56
34
325-330
340-345
385-390
375-380
Notes:
Where directors have served for part of a year, the amounts shown are for the relevant proportion of the year.
1.
For NEDs, the benefits value reflects the cost of reimbursing their travel to FRC offices.
2.
Salary value includes allowances and other cash pay elements that are subject to UK taxation. The amounts shown are post salary sacrifice, which may result in decreases compared with previous years.
3.
For Executive Directors, the benefits value is the cost of life assurance and income protection.
4.
Pension benefit is the total value of employer payments to a Defined Contribution pension scheme.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
74
Fair pay disclosures (subject to audit)
Reporting bodies are required to disclose the relationship between the remuneration of the highest paid director in their organisation and the lower quartile, median and upper quartile remuneration of the organisation's workforce. To ensure the information is comparable, the salary amounts used are the annualised, full-time equivalent and disregard any individual options exercised, such as salary sacrifice schemes or the purchase or sale of annual leave.
The following table shows the ratio between the mid-point of the banded remuneration of the highest paid director, to the pay and benefits figures and full-time equivalent salary component of the employees who are on the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles of all FRC employees.
25th percentile
50th percentile
75th percentile
2025/26
2025/26
2025/26
2024/25
2024/25
2024/25
5.13
5.03
3.38
3.44
2.88
2.86
Total pay and benefits
5.20
5.08
3.40
3.45
2.91
2.92
Salary component
The following table shows the total pay and benefits figures and full-time equivalent salary component of the employees who are on the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles of all FRC employees.
25th percentile
50th percentile
75th percentile
2025/26
2024/25
2024/25
2024/25
2025/26
2025/26
70,626
70,100
107,344
102,548
125,775
123,412
Total pay and benefits
68,728
68,402
105,120
100,594
122,971
119,028
Salary component
Based on the salary component, the banded remuneration of the highest paid Director, the Chief Executive Officer, was £355,000 - £360,000 per year (2024/25: £345,000 - £350,000). This was 3.40 times (2024/25: 3.45) the median remuneration of the workforce, which was
£105,120 (2024/25: £100,594).
The average percentage change in the salary and allowances of the Chief Executive Officer from 2024/25 was 2.88% due to an increase in base salary. The Chief Executive Officer does not receive any performance-related pay or bonus but received the same non-consolidated award as all other eligible employees. The average percentage change in the salary and allowances of FRC employees from 2024/25 was 4.50% because of the 2025 pay review. The average percentage change in the performance-related pay and bonuses for FRC employees was an increase of 18.18% following the decision to increase the award to £1,300 (2023/24: £1,100).
The salary component is made up of the full-time equivalent salary and allowances but excluding any salary sacrifice. The total pay and benefit takes in all non-cash benefits in kind. It does not include severance payments, or any employer's pension allowance or payments in lieu of pension. In 2025/26, no employee received remuneration in excess of the annual equivalent remuneration of the highest paid director. Employee remuneration ranged from £23,667 to £259,603.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
75
Off-payroll engagements
Highly paid off-payroll worker engagements,
earning £245 per day or greater
No.
2
No. of existing engagements as at 31 March 2026
Of which, number that existed:
2
Less than 1 year
For between 1 and 2 years
For between 2 and 3 years
For between 3 and 4 years For 4 or more years
All highly paid off-payroll workers engaged at any point
during the year, earning £245 per day or greater
No.
3
No. of temporary off-payroll workers engaged during the year
Of which:
3
Not subject to off-payroll legislation
Subject to off-payroll legislation and determined as in-scope of IR35 Subject to off-payroll legislation and determined as out-of-scope of IR35
Number of engagements reassessed for compliance or assurance purposes during the year
Of which: number of engagements that saw a change to IR35 status following review
Engagements of Board members and/or senior officials with significant
financial responsibility between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026
No.
No. of off-payroll engagements of Board members and/or senior officials
during the year
0
Total no. of individuals on payroll and off payroll that have been deemed
16
“Board members and/or senior officials with significant responsibility” during
the financial year. This includes both on-payroll and off-payroll engagements
Information on employee numbers and the cost of temporary people and consultants are included in note 5 of the Financial Statements.
Exit packages (subject to audit)
Redundancy and other departure costs incurred are set out below. A compulsory redundancy is any departure resulting from a restructure or other change leading to a role ceasing to exist. Other departures are those mutually agreed with the individual concerned.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
76
Total number of exit packages by
Number of compulsory redundancies
Number of other departures agreed
cost band
2025/26
2024/25
2024/25
2025/26
2025/26
2024/25
Exit package cost band
-
-
-
2
-
2
< £10,000
1
1
-
-
1
1
£10,000 - £25,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
£25,001 - £50,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
£50,001 - £100,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
£100,001 - £150,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
£150,001 - £200,000
Total number of exit packages
1
1
-
2
1
3
19
21
-
10
19
31
Total cost £'000
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
77
23.
Directors' report
The directors of the FRC (Registered number: 02486368) present their report for the year ended 31 March 2026. This report should be read in conjunction with both the Strategic Report (page 6), which includes compliance, and the Governance Report (page 47), which includes the corporate governance statement.
In accordance with section 414C (11) of the Companies Act 2006, the directors have provided disclosures and information in relation to a number of matters elsewhere in this Annual Report. These matters, together with those required under The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, as amended in 2013, and voluntary disclosures under the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) are cross-referenced in the table below.
Topic/reporting responsibility
Relevant section
Page
10
Business model
Our business model
10
Values
Our business model
11
Strategy
Our business model
13
Chief Executive's report
11
Likely future developments
Our business model
13
Chief Executive's report
13
Principal activities
Chief Executive's report
13
Chief Executive's report
Research and development activities
20
Analysis of performance
Operational Performance Measures
and current position
Financial Statements
82
95
Post-balance sheet events
Notes to the Financial Statements
40
Risk management
Factors affecting future development and
long-term viability
40
Risk management
Principal risk and risk management policies
38
Financial risks
Financial review
95
Notes to the Financial Statements
67
Reviews of internal controls
Audit & Risk Committee report
32
Bribery &
Compliance
Anti-Corruption Policy
32
Whistleblowing
Compliance
32
Procurement policy
Compliance
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
78
Topic/reporting responsibility
Relevant section
Page
32
Payment practices
Compliance
32
Modern Slavery Statement
Compliance
25
Section 172 statement
Section 172 and stakeholder engagement
25
Stakeholder interests
Section 172 and stakeholder engagement
23
Gender pay gap reporting
Our people and culture framework
74
Pay ratios
Remuneration framework – pay multiples and director remuneration
50
Governance and transparency framework
Corporate governance statement
53
Governance and transparency framework
Names of directors holding office
24
Our people and culture framework
Statement on employment of disabled persons
28
Environmental impacts
Streamlined energy and carbon reporting
31
Data security (SASB)
Compliance
22
Our people and culture framework
Workforce diversity and engagement (SASB)
31
Compliance
Professional integrity (SASB)
Directors' responsibilities statement
The directors (including the Chief Executive as Accounting Officer) are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Financial Statements in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Company law requires the directors to prepare Financial Statements for each financial year.
The directors have elected to prepare the Financial Statements in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as adapted or interpreted by the HM Treasury Government Financial Reporting Manual (FReM). The directors must not approve the Financial Statements unless satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the profit or loss of the company for the period.
In preparing these Financial Statements, the directors are required to:
Select suitable accounting policies and apply them consistently.
Make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent.
State whether the IFRS as adapted or interpreted by FReM have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the Financial Statements.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
79
Ensure a system of internal controls is in place to enable the preparation of Financial Statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Prepare the Financial Statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the FRC will continue in business.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the FRC's transactions and disclose, with reasonable accuracy at any time, the financial position of the FRC, and enable the directors to ensure that the Financial Statements comply with the Companies Act 2006.
They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the FRC and, hence, for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
In assessing the going concern, the Board is satisfied that the FRC will continue to operate for a minimum of 12 months after the approval of the Financial Statements. In addition, DBT provides the FRC with confirmation that it would help the FRC meet its financial obligations, if necessary, that would allow the FRC to continue its operations for a minimum of 12 months after the approval of the Financial Statements.
The directors consider that the Annual Report and Accounts taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable, and that it contains the information necessary for the user to assess the position, performance, business model and strategy of the FRC.
Board of Directors
On page 51, we have included information on the names of the individuals who, at any time during the financial year, were directors of the FRC, as well as their attendance.
Appointment of directors
NEDs are appointed for fixed terms, which may be renewed, rather than being submitted for re-election at regular intervals. There were no new appointments made during the financial year under review.
Retirement, vacation and removal of directors
During the financial year under review, Ruwan Weerasekera resigned from the Board on 4 December 2025.
In accordance with the Articles of Association, the Secretary of State or their duly authorised representative, may at any time remove any person so appointed. A director of the company shall retire from office upon the expiry of the period specified in the most recent notice of his or her appointment or reappointment received by the company, or if no period is specified therein, upon the third anniversary of such appointment or reappointment.
The office of director shall be vacated if the director:
Is removed from office pursuant to the provisions of Articles of Association 5.1.
Resigns his or her office by notice in writing received at the registered office of the company.
Ceases to be a member of the company.
Ceases to be a director by virtue of any provision of the Companies Act, or otherwise becomes prohibited by law from being a director.
In the case of the Chief Executive, ceases to hold that position.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
80
Directors and directors' insurance and indemnities
Under the terms of the FRC's Articles of Association, all directors are members of the FRC and each has undertaken to guarantee the liability of the FRC up to an amount not exceeding £1. There are no other members and no dividend is payable. The FRC purchased
and maintained the directors' and officers' liability insurance in respect of itself and for its directors and officers throughout the financial year. This gives appropriate cover for any legal action brought against the FRC or its directors or officers.
Articles of Association
The company's Articles may be amended by a special resolution of the company members. The Articles were last amended in June 2026.
Related party transactions
Related party transactions are disclosed in note 14 to the Accounts.
Political donation disclosures
As a central Government body, the FRC is compliant with Managing Public Money. Political affiliations and disclosures are not consistent with the principles of Managing Public Money. No political donations were made during the year.
Key contracts
The FRC has a number of key contracts. However, the FRC performs several checks on the providers of these contracts, including financial health checks. As part of the FRC's Business Continuity Planning, scenario testing is undertaken in respect of the failure of one of the firms providing the key contracts.
Company's trading activities
The FRC is not a trading company. There have been no changes in the corporate structure.
Disclosure to the auditor
The directors, including the Chief Executive as Accounting Officer, at the date of this report, confirm that, as far as they are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the FRC's auditor is unaware. Each director has taken all steps that they ought to have taken as a director to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the FRC's auditor is aware of that information.
Auditors
The NAO, on behalf of the Comptroller and Auditor General, has expressed its willingness to remain in office. The Audit & Risk Committee reached the conclusion that the NAO has continued to perform the external audit in a professional and efficient manner and is deemed to be reappointed.
Approved by the Board of Directors on
23 June 2026
23 June 2026
and signed on its behalf by:
Richard Moriarty
CEO and Accounting Officer
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
81
Financial Statements
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
82
24.
Independent Auditor's report to the members of The Financial Reporting Council Limited and the Houses of Parliament
Opinion on financial statements
I have audited the financial statements of The Financial Reporting Council Limited (‘the FRC') for the year ended 31 March 2026 which comprise the FRC's:
Statement of Financial Position as at 31 March 2026;
Statement of Comprehensive Net Income, Statement of Cash Flows and Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended; and
the related notes including the significant accounting policies.
The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the FRC financial statements is applicable law and the UK adopted International Accounting Standards.
In my opinion the financial statements:
give a true and fair view of the state of FRC's affairs as at 31 March 2026 and of the net income for the year then ended;
have been properly prepared in accordance with the UK adopted International Accounting Standards; and
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Opinion on regularity
In my opinion, in all material respects the income and expenditure recorded in the financial statements have been applied to the purposes intended by Parliament and the financial transactions recorded in the financial statements conform to the authorities which govern them.
Basis for opinion
I conducted my audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)), applicable law and Practice Note 10 ‘Audit of Financial Statements and Regularity of Public Sector Bodies in the United Kingdom (2024)'. My responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of my report.
Those standards require me and my staff to comply with the Financial Reporting Council's Revised Ethical Standard 2024. I am independent of the FRC in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to my audit of the financial statements in the UK. My staff and I have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
I believe that the audit evidence I have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for my opinion.
The framework of authorities described in the table below has been considered in the context of my opinion on regularity.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
83
Framework of Authorities
Authorising legislation
Companies Act 2006
Statutory Audit and Third Country Auditor Regulations (SATCAR) 2013, 2016 and 2017
Local Audit (Delegation of Functions) and Statutory Audit (Delegations of Functions) Order 2014
Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014
HM Treasury and
Framework Document between the Department
related authorities
and the FRC
Managing Public Money (as applicable under the Framework Document with the Department)
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, I have concluded that the FRC's use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
My evaluation of the director's assessment of the entity's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included review of management's forecasts and sensitivity analysis, and obtaining and reviewing a signed letter from the Department for Business and Trade.
Based on the work I have performed, I have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the FRC's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
In relation to the entities reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, I have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the director's considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
My responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
Overview of my audit approach
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in my professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by the auditor, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team.
I do not consider the work I have performed in response to the presumed risk of management override of controls, which I have identified as a significant risk in accordance with the requirements of ISA (UK) 240 The Auditor's Responsibility Relating to Fraud in Financial Statements, to be a key audit matter.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
84
I have not identified any key audit matters throughout the course of my audit.
In this year's report the following changes to the risks identified have been made compared to my prior year report:
I have not included information on the audit work I have performed on the FRC's first-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). I have not identified this as a significant risk for the audit of the 2025/26 Financial Statements, as the matter wholly related to the 2024/25 financial statements.
I have not included information on the audit work I have performed on accounting for new leases. The FRC have not entered any new leases in 2025/26 and I do not consider this a key audit matter.
I have not included information on the audit work I have performed on the provisions for dilapidations. I no longer consider the estimation uncertainty, and significant assumptions require this to be an area of focus for my audit. A finalised settlement is yet to be agreed and I have not identified any matters which indicate that the estimate is materially misstated. Therefore, I have not identified it as a key audit matter.
Application of materiality
Materiality
I applied the concept of materiality in both planning and performing my audit, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements on my audit and on the financial statements. This approach recognises that financial statements are rarely absolutely correct, and that an audit is designed to provide reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement or irregularity. A matter is material if its omission or misstatement would, in the judgement of the auditor, reasonably influence the decisions of users of the financial statements.
Based on my professional judgement, I determined overall materiality for the FRC's financial statements as a whole as follows:
Audited Entity
Materiality
£1 million
Basis for
1.5% of gross expenditure of £69m (2024/25: 1.5% of gross
determining materiality
expenditure of £67m)
Rationale for the
I considered several benchmarks for materiality, including
benchmark applied
comprehensive net income, revenue, asset measures and
equity. Given that the FRC is a regulator, it incurs costs in fulfilling its responsibilities and collects funds sufficient to cover those costs. Consequently, users of the financial statements will principally be interested in the cost of the FRC discharging its responsibilities. Mindful of this,
I identified gross expenditure as the key driver. Gross expenditure is defined as total operating expenses adding back cost rewards recovered.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
85
Performance Materiality
I set performance materiality at a level lower than materiality to reduce the probability that, in aggregate, uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceed the materiality for the financial statements as a whole. Performance materiality was set at 75% of materiality for the 2025/26 audit (2024/25: 75%). In determining performance materiality, I have also considered the uncorrected misstatements identified in the previous period, and the FRC's overall control environment for the risks of material misstatements in the period.
Other Materiality Considerations
Apart from matters that are material by value (quantitative materiality), there are certain matters that are material by their very nature and would influence the decisions of users if not corrected. Such an example is any errors reported in the Related Parties note in the financial statements. Assessment of such matters needs to have regard to the nature of the misstatement and the applicable legal and reporting framework, as well as the size of the misstatement.
I applied the same concept of materiality to my audit of regularity. In planning and performing audit work to support my opinion on regularity and in evaluating the impact of any irregular transactions, I considered both quantitative and qualitative aspects that would reasonably influence the decisions of users of the financial statements.
Error Reporting Threshold
I agreed with the Audit and Risk Committee that I would report to it all uncorrected misstatements identified through my audit in excess of £20,000, as well as differences below this threshold that in my view warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. I also report to the Audit Committee on disclosure matters that I identified when assessing the overall presentation of the financial statements.
Total unadjusted audit differences reported to the Audit and Risk Committee have decreased net income by £218k.
Audit scope
The scope of my audit was determined by obtaining an understanding of the FRC and its environment, including the entity wide controls, and assessing the risks of material misstatement.
Our planning and audit work procedures were undertaken both remotely and in person. My team discussed the framework of authorities with management and reviewed the results of testing to determine whether any evidence of material irregularity was noted.
Other Information
The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and my auditor's report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information.
My opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in my report, I do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
My responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or my knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
86
If I identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, I am required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work I have performed, I conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, I am required to report that fact.
I have nothing to report in this regard.
Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In my opinion the part of the Directors' Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
In my opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
the information given in the Strategic Report and the Directors' Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements;
the Strategic Report and the Directors' Report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements; and
the information about internal control and risk management systems in relation to financial reporting processes, and about share capital structures, in compliance with rules
7.2.5 and 7.2.6 in the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules sourcebook made by the Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA Rules), is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements; and
Information about the FRC's corporate governance code and practices and about its administrative, management and supervisory bodies and their committees complies with rules 7.2.2, 7.2.3 and 7.2.7 of the FCA Rules.
Matters on which I report by exception
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the FRC and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, I have not identified material misstatements:
in the Strategic Report or the Directors' Report.
I have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires me to report to you if, in my opinion:
adequate accounting records have not been kept or returns adequate for my audit have not been received from branches not visited by my staff; or
I have not received all of the information and explanations I require for my audit; or
the financial statements and the parts of the Directors' Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
certain disclosures of director's remuneration specified by law are not made.
Corporate governance statement
The Listing Rules require me to review the Directors' statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the FRC's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for my review.
Based on the work undertaken as part of my audit, I have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements or my knowledge obtained during the audit:
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
87
Directors' statement with regards the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material uncertainties identified set out on page 80;
Directors' statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 80;
Board's confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on pages 43 to 46;
The section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems set out on pages 40 and 41;
The section describing the work of the audit committee set out on pages 67 to 69.
The directors have not provided an assessment of the entity's prospects, the period this assessment covers and why this period is appropriate as required by provision 31 of the UK Corporate Governance Code. The directors have set out the reasons for omitting these disclosures on page 50.
I have nothing to report in respect of these matters.
Responsibilities of the Directors for the financial statements
As explained more fully in the Directors' Responsibilities Statement, the directors are responsible for:
maintaining proper accounting records;
providing the Comptroller & Auditor General (C&AG) with access to all information of which management is aware that is relevant to the preparation of the financial statements such as records, documentation and other matters;
providing the C&AG with additional information and explanations needed for his audit;
providing the C&AG with unrestricted access to persons within the FRC from whom the auditor determines it necessary to obtain audit evidence.
preparing financial statements, which give a true and fair view, in accordance with the Companies Act 2006;
ensuring such internal controls are in place as deemed necessary to enable the preparation of financial statement to be free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error;
preparing the Annual Report, which includes the Directors' Remuneration Report, in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and HM Treasury Government Financial Reporting Manual; and
assessing the FRC's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intends to liquidate the entity or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
My responsibility is to audit and report on the financial statements in accordance with the applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)).
My objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue a report that includes my opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
88
material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting non-compliance with laws and regulations including fraud
I design procedures in line with my responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of non-compliance with laws and regulations, including fraud. The extent to which my procedures are capable of detecting non-compliance with laws and regulations, including fraud is detailed below.
Identifying and assessing potential risks related to non-compliance with laws and regulations, including fraud
In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement in respect of non-compliance with laws and regulations, including fraud, I:
considered the nature of the sector, control environment and operational performance including the design of the FRC's accounting policies and key performance indicators.
inquired of management, FRCs head of internal audit and those charged with governance, including obtaining and reviewing supporting documentation relating to the FRC's policies and procedures on:
ჰ identifying, evaluating and complying with laws and regulations; ჰ detecting and responding to the risks of fraud; and
ჰ the internal controls established to mitigate risks related to fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations including the FRC's controls relating to the FRC's compliance with the Companies Act 2006 and Managing Public Money;
inquired of management the FRC's head of internal audit and those charged with governance whether:
ჰ they were aware of any instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations; and ჰ they had knowledge of any actual, suspected, or alleged fraud;
discussed with the engagement team, regarding how and where fraud might occur in the financial statements and any potential indicators of fraud.
As a result of these procedures, I considered the opportunities and incentives that may exist within the FRC for fraud and identified the greatest potential for fraud in the following areas: revenue recognition, posting of unusual journals, complex transactions and bias
in management estimates. In common with all audits under ISAs (UK), I am required to perform specific procedures to respond to the risk of management override.
I obtained an understanding of the FRC's framework of authority and other legal and regulatory frameworks in which the FRC operates. I focused on those laws and regulations that had a direct effect on material amounts and disclosures in the financial statements or that had a fundamental effect on the operations of the FRC. The key laws and regulations I considered in this context included Companies Act 2006, Managing Public Money, SATCAR 2013, 2016 and 2017, Local Audit (Delegation of Functions) and Statutory Audit (Delegation of Functions) Order 2014, Local Audit and Accountancy Act 2014, employment law and pensions legislation.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
89
Audit response to identified risk
To respond to the identified risks resulting from the above procedures:
I reviewed the financial statement disclosures and testing to supporting documentation to assess compliance with provisions of relevant laws and regulations described above as having direct effect on the financial statements;
I enquired of management, the Audit and Risk Committee and in-house legal counsel concerning actual and potential litigation and claims;
I reviewed minutes of meetings of those charged with governance and the Board and internal audit reports;
I addressed the risk of fraud through management override of controls by testing the appropriateness of journal entries and other adjustments; assessing whether the judgements made on estimates are indicative of a potential bias; and evaluating the business rationale of any significant transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course of business; and
I communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential risks of fraud to all engagement team members and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.
A further description of my responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council's website at: www.frc.org.uk/ auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of my report.
Other auditor's responsibilities
I am required to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to give reasonable assurance that the expenditure and income recorded in the financial statements have been applied to the purposes intended by Parliament and the financial transactions recorded in the financial statements conform to the authorities which govern them.
I communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control I identify during my audit.
Eleanor Parker (Senior Statutory Auditor) For and on behalf of the
Comptroller and Auditor General (Statutory Auditor)
National Audit Office
157-197 Buckingham Palace Road Victoria
London SW1W 9SP
7 July 2026
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
90
25.
Financial Statements
The Financial Reporting Council Limited
Registered number: 02486368
Statement of comprehensive net income for the year ended 31 March 2026
2025/26
2024/25
Note
£'000
£'000
2
69,049
69,946
Income
3
(65,575)
(67,777)
Operating expenses
3,474
2,169
Net operating income/(expenditure)
12 & 13
(236)
(158)
Finance charge
3,238
2,011
Net income for the year
3,238
2,011
Comprehensive net income for the year
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
91
Statement of financial position as at 31 March 2026
31 March
31 March
Note
2026
2025
£'000
£'000
Non-current assets
41
62
7
Intangible assets
4,797
6,069
8
Property, plant and equipment
4,838
6,131
Total non-current assets
Current assets
7,945
9,343
9
Trade and other receivables
17,682
13,721
10
Cash and cash equivalents
25,627
23,064
Total current assets
30,465
29,195
Total assets
Current liabilities
(5,652)
(6,699)
11
Trade and other payables
(968)
(922)
12
Lease liabilities
(747)
(718)
13
Dilapidation provisions
(7,367)
(8,339)
Total current liabilities
23,098
20,856
Total assets less current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
(2,507)
(3,502)
12
Lease liabilities
(567)
(568)
13
Dilapidation provisions
(3,074)
(4,070)
Total non-current liabilities
20,024
16,786
Net Assets
Capital and reserves
Accounting, auditing and corporate governance:
8,960
6,198
- General reserve
2,000
2,000
- Corporate reporting review legal cost fund
Actuarial standards and regulation:
7,064
6,588
- General reserve
2,000
2,000
- Actuarial case cost fund
20,024
16,786
Total
The financial statements and notes on pages 91-113 were approved by the Board of Directors on
23 June 2026
23 June 2026
and signed on its behalf by:
Richard Moriarty Chief Executive Officer and Accounting Officer
Sir Jan du Plessis
Chair
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
92
Statement of changes in equity for the period ended 31 March 2026
Accounting, auditing
Actuarial standards and regulation
and corporate governance
Total
General
Corporate
General
Actuarial
reserve
reporting
reserve
case cost
review legal cost
fund
fund
£'000
£'000
£'000
£'000
£'000
Balance at 1 April 2024
4,230
2,000
6,545
2,000
14,775
Comprehensive net income for the year
1,968
0
43
0
2,011
Balance at 31
6,198
2,000
6,588
2,000
16,786
March 2025
Comprehensive net income for the year
2,762
0
476
0
3,238
Balance at 31
8,960
2,000
7,064
2,000
20,024
March 2026
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
93
Statement of cash flows for the period ended 31 March 2026
2025/26
2024/25
Cash flows from operating activities
£'000
£'000
3,238
2,011
Comprehensive income for the year
Adjustments for:
1,552
2,219
3
- Depreciation and amortisation
208
134
12
- Interest on lease liabilities
Note
28
24
13
- Increase in dilapidation provisions
- (Increase)/decrease in trade and
1,398
(477)
9
other receivables
(1,047)
1,634
11
- Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
0
(21)
- Other non-cash adjustments
5,377
5,524
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operations
0
0
Corporation tax paid
Total cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities
5,377
5,524
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and
(259)
(1,160)
intangible assets
7 & 8
Disposal of property, plant and equipment and
0
0
intangible assets
7 & 8
0
(48)
Payment of stamp duty
(259)
(1,208)
Total cash outflow from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
(1,157)
(1,699)
12
Payment of lease liabilities
(1,157)
(1,699)
Total cash outflow from financing activities
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
3,961
2,617
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of
13,721
11,104
10
the period
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of
17,682
13,721
10
the period
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
94
26.
Notes to the Financial Statements
1.
Principal accounting policies
The FRC is a company limited by guarantee, incorporated in the United Kingdom. The company's registered office is 13th Floor, 1 Harbour Exchange Square, London, E14 9GE and its registered number is 02486368.
The ultimate controlling party of the FRC is the Secretary of State for the DBT.
The FRC has one subsidiary, the UKEB. It is a company limited by guarantee of which the FRC is the sole member. Its registered office is 13th Floor, 1 Harbour Exchange Square, London, E14 9GE. The subsidiary has not traded during the year and has no assets or liabilities. Therefore, it is not material to the financial performance and position of the FRC. Consequently, no consolidated set of financial statements has been prepared because they fall within the exclusions provided in section 405 of the Companies Act 2006.
a)
Basis of preparation
These financial statements for the period ended 31 March 2026 are prepared in accordance with the IFRS as adapted or interpreted by the HM Treasury 2025/26 Government Financial Reporting Manual (FReM), where the requirements are appropriate and do not contradict with the Companies Act 2006 for the public sector context. Where the FReM permits a choice of accounting policy, the FRC has applied the policy deemed to be most appropriate to its particular circumstances for the purposes of giving a true and fair view.
b)
Accounting conventions
These financial statements are prepared under the historical cost convention.
c)
Going concern
The directors have performed a going concern review considering income and costs, and the Board is satisfied that the FRC will continue as a going concern for a period of not less than 12 months after the approval of these financial statements. Whilst performing their review, the Board were also cognisant that DBT have also provided a letter of financial support to the Accounting Officer, confirming that they will provide funding such that the Company can meet its liabilities as they fall due for a period of not less than 12 months from the date the financial statements are approved.
d)
Significant accounting estimates, judgements and assumptions
The preparation of financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. Although these estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and management's best knowledge of current events and actions,
the actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an on-going basis.
Provisions for dilapidations
Provisions for dilapidations represents an area requiring significant estimates and judgements where there is the greatest potential risk of a material adjustment in future years. The FRC assesses provisions for dilapidations using third party surveyor reports.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
95
Discussions remain ongoing regarding the settlement of the lease at 125 London Wall, which ended in the previous financial year, and 10 South Colonnade, which ended in June 2025. No payments have been made in respect of dilapidations for either property.
The provision recognised represents management's current best estimate of the expected settlement amount, applying a probability-weighted assessment of potential outcomes.
The ultimate settlement amount may differ from the amounts provided.
e)
Presentation of financial statements
The presentational and functional currency of the financial statements is the British Pound Sterling and rounded to the nearest thousand. Accordingly, there may be minor differences due to rounding adjustments.
f)
Standards issued but not yet effective
IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements was issued in April 2024 and becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027. IFRS 18 replaces IAS 1 and introduces changes to the structure and presentation of primary financial statements, including the requirement to present new defined subtotals such as operating profit and profit before financing and income taxes. It was endorsed by
the UKEB for adoption in the UK in December 2025.
Management is currently assessing the impact of IFRS 18 on the changes in the presentation of the FRC's financial statements when the standard becomes effective.
g)
Income
As per IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, revenue is recognised based on the amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for the transfer of goods or services. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable.
The FRC follows the five-step model under IFRS 15 for revenue recognition:
1.
Identify a contract with a customer
2.
Identify the performance obligations
3.
Determine the transaction price
4.
Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations
5.
Recognise revenue when or as performance obligations are satisfied
With the exception of the levy income, all of the FRC's income streams fall within the scope of IFRS 15. As it is not enforceable, the levies are outside the scope of IFRS 15. The levy is therefore recognised when probable and reliably measurable in accordance with the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, which is assessed to be when the contributions are received. The table below sets out the FRC's approach to income recognition for all income streams in scope of IFRS 15:
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
96
Timing of income recognition
Income stream
Nature and performance obligation
Audit firms
Delivery of Audit Quality Review, Audit Market Supervision and Audit Firm Supervision functions
Recognised evenly over time to match costs incurred (invoiced monthly)
Regulatory oversight
Accountancy professional bodies
Recognised evenly over time to match costs incurred (invoiced quarterly)
Delivery of statutory function
NAO and Crown Dependencies
Recognised over time as services are rendered
Local audit
Delivery of system leadership responsibilities for local audit
Recognised evenly over time to match costs incurred
Third country audit
Registration of Third Country Audit firms enabling them to perform audits for UK-listed entities
Recognised over time upon registration approval
Actuarial profession
Review and regulation of the actuarial professional function
Recognised over time based on agreed invoicing periods
and performance
Publications
Provision of licensed access to FRC electronic publications
Recognised over time over the licence period (invoiced annually)
Government
Delivery of a toolkit that allows exploration of data collected by Companies House or the FCA
Recognised over time based on achievement of delivery milestones
XBRL taxonomy
Provision of XBRL taxonomies to support efficient corporate reporting
Recognised over time based on achievement of delivery milestones
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
97
h)
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are initially recognised at cost, including the purchase price, directly attributable costs to bring the asset to its intended use, and the estimated cost of dismantling and removing the asset, if applicable. After initial recognition, property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation at the reporting date. The FRC's threshold for capitalising property, plant and equipment is £1,000 (including irrecoverable VAT).
Depreciation is calculated on property, plant and equipment at rates calculated to write off the cost, less estimated residual value, on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the asset's useful life or the lease term, if applicable:
Office equipment
3 years
Fixtures, fittings & furniture
Shorter of useful life and lease term
Leasehold improvements
Shorter of useful life and lease term
Intangible assets
The FRC's intangible assets comprise of purchased software and licences, and are initially measured at cost. After initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation at the reporting date. The FRC's threshold for capitalising intangible assets is £1,000 (including irrecoverable VAT).
Intangibles are assumed to have nil residual value and amortisation is calculated at rates calculated to write off the cost on a straight-line basis over the asset's expected useful life as follows:
Capitalised software and license
3 years
Impairment
At the end of each reporting period, the FRC assesses whether there is any indication of impairment on assets, i.e. whether its carrying amount is higher than the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of the asset's fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. Any impairment losses are charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Net Income (SoCNI) and during 2025/26, the FRC did not recognise any impairment losses.
i)
Leases
As per IFRS 16 Leases, a contract is, or contains, a lease if it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Control is conveyed by having both the right to direct the use of the identified asset and obtain substantially all the economic benefits from its use.
The right-of-use (ROU) asset is measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment, if applicable. The ROU asset is depreciated over the shorter of the asset's useful life or the lease term.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
98
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments payable over the lease term, discounted using the HM Treasury discount rate. As the interest rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, and the FRC does not have borrowings, the HM Treasury rate has been used as a proxy for the incremental borrowing rate.
Low-value leases (£5,000 or below) and short-term leases (12 months or less) are exempt from recognition on the Statement of Financial Position (SoFP). During 2025/26, the FRC did not have any leases that met these criteria.
Current Leases
As at the reporting date, the FRC held two leases: 1 Harbour Exchange Square, London and 3 Arena Central, Birmingham.
A ROU asset has been recognised for these leases at the lease commencement date and comprises of an amount equal to the lease liability, any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, less any lease incentives received, plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to dismantle and remove the underlying asset or to restore the underlying asset to the condition required by the terms and conditions of the lease.
The lease at 1 Harbour Exchange Square is for five years and the lease at 3 Arena Central is for 22 years, with a five-year break clause. The lease for 3 Arena Central has been recognised for five years, based on the most likely term of occupation. This is because the currently allocated space at 3 Arena Central will not be sufficient for a longer period due to the planned headcount for the Birmingham office.
The discount rate applied is based on the calendar year that the lease commenced. For both leases, a HM Treasury discount rate of 4.72% has been applied as the leases commenced between 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024.
Modifications and terminations of leases
Any changes to lease terms, including early terminations or extensions, are accounted for as lease modifications under IFRS 16. When a lease is terminated early, the ROU asset and lease liability are adjusted to the effective date of termination, and any resulting gains or losses are credited/charged to the SoCNI. When a lease is terminated, the ROU asset and lease liability are de-recognised at the effective date of termination.
During 2025/26, the lease at 10 South Colonnade ended and therefore, the ROU asset and the corresponding lease liability have been de-recognised at the effective date of termination, 6 June 2025.
j)
Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised when the FRC becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the financial instrument.
The FRC's basic financial instruments comprise of cash in hand, trade and other receivables, and trade and other payables that arise directly from its operations. The carrying amounts are approximate to their fair value due to the short maturities of the instruments. All FRC funds are kept in Government Banking Service (GBS) bank accounts, that have been open since 2019.
The FRC's financial instruments include surplus funds which, subject to DBT approval, can be used to fund future operating costs including case costs.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
99
Financial assets
Financial assets are held at amortised cost. As per IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, receivables are shown net of any impairment losses if material. The FRC assesses expected credit losses (ECL) for trade receivables using the simplified approach. Based on historical payment patterns and absence of credit losses in prior periods, management's view is that the
ECL is considered immaterial.
The FRC's threshold for prepaid expenses is £1,000 (including irrecoverable VAT), whereby if the prepaid amount is below this threshold, the cost is charged directly to the SoCNI.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are recognised at their nominal value and subsequently measured at amortised cost (the transaction price minus any amounts settled). The FRC does not have any borrowings.
k)
Staff costs
Staff costs and people related costs in note 5 comprise expenditure relating to permanent employees, contractors and secondees. An accrual is made for any untaken annual leave as at year end using data from leave records.
Permanent staff are defined as those that have a reporting line directly to the CEO and support the operational delivery of the day-to-day activities of the FRC.
Other people related costs include fees paid to Board members, committee members, members of technical committees and panels, and special advisors to the Board, committees and panels. The costs shown include fees, allowances and any associated employer taxes or expenses members and advisors incurred in the performance of their duties.
Other costs include Group life insurance, Group income protection, Bupa dental cover, apprentice levy and medical health checks.
l)
Pension costs
The FRC operates a defined contribution scheme for its employees and recognises contributions payable as an expense in the year it is incurred. There is no further obligation once the contributions have been paid.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
100
Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
m)
The FRC recognises provisions and discloses contingent liabilities and contingent assets in accordance with IAS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
A provision is recognised in the SoFP when there is a present obligation (legal or constructive) arising from a past event which can be reliably measured, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. Where the time value of money is material, the provision is measured at present value using discount rates issued by HM Treasury.
Contingent liabilities and contingent assets are not recognised in the SoFP. Contingent liabilities are disclosed when there is a possible obligation that depends on uncertain future events, or when a present obligation exists but is not recognised because an outflow of resources is not probable or cannot be reliably measured (refer to note 17). Contingent assets are disclosed when an inflow of economic benefits is probable.
n)
Taxation
Although the FRC submits annual corporation tax returns, revenues generated by the FRC fall outside of the scope for corporation tax. Therefore, there are no temporary
differences between the recognition of that income in the financial statements and the tax computation. Accordingly, there is no provision for deferred tax.
o)
Case costs and financial sanctions
Case costs
The legal and professional costs of accountancy and actuarial disciplinary cases and Corporate Reporting Review cases incurred in the period are included in the financial statements on an accrual basis. Provision is made for the future costs of any disciplinary cases only where the contract is onerous, the costs are unavoidable, and they represent a present obligation at the SoFP date.
Financial sanctions and cost awards receivable
Case costs awards received in respect of accountancy disciplinary cases, which are due to the relevant participant body under the Accountancy Scheme, are included in the SoCNI of the FRC, as a reduction to case costs incurred and associated revenue receivable. Fines received are not included in the financial statements as the FRC acts only as a mechanism whereby the fines are transferred from one party to another.
Any fine income received or legal costs awarded to the FRC in relation to actuarial disciplinary cases are used to replenish the actuarial case cost fund. Should the fund exceed the target level, the excess is used to meet the FRC's actuarial operating costs, thereby reducing the costs to the funding groups.
p)
Components of equity
As set out in the Statement of Changes in Equity, equity comprises the general reserves (separating those that arose from actuarial activities) of the FRC and two costs funds.
General reserves
As the FRC is a public body, the use of cash represented by general reserves is subject to approval by the government.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
101
Costs funds
The FRC has two cost funds: the Corporate Reporting Review Legal Costs Fund and the Actuarial Case Costs Fund.
Contributions have been received to enable the Conduct Committee to take steps to pursue compliance with certain requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and applicable accounting standards, and to investigate departures from those requirements and standards. Those funds may be used only for this purpose and may not be used to meet other costs incurred by the FRC. The FRC retains the Legal Costs Fund while it continues to be authorised by the Secretary of State for DBT for the purposes of section 456 of the Companies Act 2006.
The Legal Costs Fund is currently maintained at £2m. Where use is made of these funds in the year, the funds are replenished the following year from the levies. DBT have confirmed that if the Legal Costs Fund falls below £1m in any one year, they will make a grant to cover legal costs subsequently incurred in that year.
The Actuarial Case Costs Fund consists of contributions received from the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, and through levies on pension schemes and insurance companies. The fund is used to fund investigations into potential misconduct by actuaries and any subsequent prosecutions.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
102
2.
Income
2025/26
2024/25
£'000
£'000
Levy income
27,110
25,126
Preparers levy
3,895
3,367
Insurance and pension levies
31,005
28,493
Sub total
Other income
18,635
18,112
Audit firms
14,445
14,700
Accountancy professional bodies
1,193
1,219
NAO and Crown Dependencies
152
1,102
Local audit
209
216
Third country audit
230
230
Actuarial profession
289
594
Publications
27
630
Government
339
314
XBRL taxonomy
35,519
37,117
Sub total
For accountancy disciplinary case costs
6,504
7,339
Accountancy professional bodies
(3,979)
(3,003)
less cost awards recovered
2,525
4,336
Sub total
69,049
69,946
Total
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
103
3.
Operating expenses
2025/26
2024/25
2025/26
2024/25
£'000
£'000
£'000
£'000
Core operating expenses
52,042
51,421
Staff and related people costs (note 5)
5,149
6,281
IT and facility costs
0
(20)
Lease expense
1,552
2,219
Depreciation and amortisation costs
108
114
External audit fees*
339
314
XBRL taxonomy development costs
59,190
60,329
Sub total
Other operating expenses
726
535
Travel and conferences
1,671
1,634
Legal and professional fees
1,463
943
All other costs
3,860
3,112
Sub total
Accountancy disciplinary case costs
6,504
7,339
Accountancy professional bodies
(3,979)
(3,003)
Less cost awards recovered
2,525
4,336
Sub total
65,575
67,777
Total
* The external audit fee of £108k (plus VAT) is for external audit services performed by the National Audit Office. It does not include any fees for non-audit services as no such work was undertaken during the year.
4.
Taxation
During 2025/26, the FRC had no corporation tax due (2024/25: £0).
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
104
5.
Staff and related people costs (including directors)
2025/26
2024/25
2025/26
2024/25
£'000
£'000
£'000
£'000
Permanent staff:
43,602
43,489
Salaries
5,843
5,084
Social security costs
4,700
4,554
Pension costs
54,145
53,127
Total permanent staff costs
Other people related costs:
195
340
Seconded staff and contractors
946
942
Fees paid to Board, Committee and Panel members
878
913
Other costs
56,164
55,322
Total staff and related people costs
(4,122)
(3,901)
Staff costs transferred to cases*
52,042
51,421
Total core staff and related people costs
*
Based on staff time spent on enforcement cases recharged to the sponsoring RSB.
Average permanent staff numbers by division:
Permanent
Other*
2025/26
2024/25
46
1
47
54
Strategy, Governance and Stakeholder Engagement
76
64
70
6
Corporate Services
62
1
63
67
Enforcement
67
0
67
71
Regulatory Standards
183
1
184
191
Supervision
26
1
27
30
UK Endorsement Board
454
10
464
477
Total
*
Other category relates to agency staff, consultants and inward secondments where FRC is paying their costs.
This number is derived from an average number of staff employed across the year.
Directors' emoluments:
2025/26
2024/25
£'000
£'000
615
601
Fees (included in staff costs)
56
35
Other pension costs
671
636
Sub total
85
72
Social security costs
756
708
Total
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
105
6.
Financial risk management
The FRC's operations expose it to some financial risks which require disclosure in accordance with IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures. Management continuously monitors these risks with a view to protecting the FRC against the potential adverse effects of these financial risks. There has been no significant change in these financial risks since the prior year.
Credit risk
The FRC is exposed to credit risk primarily from trade receivables in the normal course of business activities. These receivables do not contain any significant financing component and are typically due within 30 days. As at the reporting date, the FRC's exposure to credit risk in respect of trade receivables was £2.8m (refer to note 9)
The FRC manages credit risk by monitoring outstanding balances regularly and historically, trade receivables are settled promptly. The FRC considers the risk of default to be low due to the nature of its customers and historical payment patterns.
At 31 March 2026, all FRC cash was held within the GBS bank accounts, where funds are backed by HM Treasury.
Interest rate risk
Funds held in GBS bank accounts do not generate receivable interest but do incur bank charges for payment services.
Liquidity risk
The FRC assesses the inherent risk of its preparers levy, as it is a significant source of income for the FRC and is voluntary in nature. To manage the liquidity risk associated with levies, the FRC uses historical data to forecast cash inflows which aids in setting realistic expectations for levy collections and the levy rate used is based on those historical rates and market conditions.
The FRC maintains sufficient levels of cash and cash equivalents and manages its working capital by carefully reviewing forecasts on a regular basis to meet the requirements for its day-to-day operations.
Capital management
FRC's capital structure is made up of two general funds and two reserves, as set out in the Statement of Financial Position. These are represented by cash held in instant access bank accounts within the Government Banking Service. The FRC manages its capital by:
i.
Monitoring planned expenditure and financial forecasts in line with the Plan and Budget, which is published annually.
ii.
Maintaining adequate liquidity to support ongoing operations.
iii.
Ensuring the levy collection strategy remains appropriate and sufficient to maintain adequate liquidity.
iv.
Lastly, considering financial risks as a part of financial planning.
The FRC is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.
There have been no changes to this approach from the prior year.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
106
7.
Intangible assets
Software
£'000
2025/26
128
Cost at 1 April 2025
0
Additions
(6)
Disposals
122
Cost at 31 March 2026
66
Amortisation at 1 April 2025
21
Charge for year
(6)
Disposals
81
Amortisation at 31 March 2026
41
Net book value at 31 March 2026
62
Net book value at 31 March 2025
Software
2024/25
£'000
66
Cost at 1 April 2024
62
Additions
0
Disposals
128
Cost at 31 March 2025
62
Amortisation at 1 April 2024
4
Charge for year
0
Disposals
66
Amortisation at 31 March 2025
62
Net book value at 31 March 2025
4
Net book value at 31 March 2024
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
107
8.
Property, plant and equipment
Right-of-use assets
Fixtures, fittings and furniture
Leasehold improvements
Office equipment
Total
£'000
£'000
£'000
£'000
£'000
2025/26
522
1,118
664
5,483
7,787
Cost at 1 April 2025
0
157
102
0
259
Addition
0
0
0
0
0
Remeasurement
0
(69)
(360)
(152)
(581)
Disposals*
Cost at 31 March 2026
522
1,206
406
5,331
7,465
Depreciation at 1
0
775
392
551
1,718
April 2025
118
186
81
1,146
1,531
Charge for year
0
0
0
0
0
Remeasurement
0
(69)
(360)
(152)
(581)
Disposals*
Depreciation at 31
118
892
113
1,545
2,668
March 2026
Net book value at 31 March 2026
404
314
293
3,786
4,797
Net book value at 31 March 2025
522
343
272
4,932
6,069
*
Disposal of 10 South Colonnade lease that ended during the year.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
108
Fixtures, fittings and furniture
Right-of-use assets
Leasehold improvements
Office equipment
Total
£'000
£'000
2024/25
£'000
£'000
£'000
2,467
957
1,137
2,182
6,743
Cost at 1 April 2024
522
302
274
5,618
6,716
Additions*
0
0
0
(539)
(539)
Remeasurement**
(2,467)
(141)
(747)
(1,778)
(5,133)
Disposals***
Cost at 31 March 2025
522
1,118
664
5,483
7,787
Depreciation at 1
2,237
747
931
848
4,763
April 2024
230
169
208
1,608
2,215
Charge for year
0
0
0
(127)
(127)
Remeasurement**
(2,467)
(141)
(747)
(1,778)
(5,133)
Disposals***
Depreciation at 31
0
775
392
551
1,718
March 2025
Net book value at 31 March 2025
522
343
272
4,932
6,069
Net book value at 31 March 2024
230
210
206
1,334
1,980
*
New leases were taken during 2024/25 at 3 Arena Central and 1 Harbour Exchange Square.
**
Remeasurement of 10 South Colonnade lease during 2024/25 due to early termination.
***  Disposal of 125 London Wall lease that ended during 2024/25.
9.
Trade and other receivables
2025/26
2024/25
£'000
£'000
2,816
4,419
Trade receivables
3,232
2,274
Prepayments
1,887
2,643
Accrued income*
0
0
Enforcement fines and cost awards
10
7
Other receivables
7,945
9,343
Total
*
During the year, £2,631k (2024/25: £2,261k) revenue has been recognised from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods..
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
109
10.
Cash and cash equivalents
2025/26
2024/25
£'000
£'000
2,000
2,000
Actuarial Case Costs Fund
2,000
2,000
Corporate Reporting Review Legal Costs Fund
13,682
9,721
General Accounts
17,682
13,721
Balance at 31 March *
*
Note 1(p) - Cash is subject to utilisation only upon receiving approval from Government.
Trade and other payables
11.
2025/26
2024/25
£'000
£'000
446
1,505
Trade payables
1,823
1,507
Other taxation and social security
2,857
2,625
Accruals
317
413
Deferred income
184
0
Enforcement fines and cost awards
25
649
Other payables
5,652
6,699
Total
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
110
Lease liabilities
12.
2025/26
2024/25
Office accommodation
£'000
£'000
4,424
1,629
Balance at 1 April
0
4,756
Additions
0
(396)
Remeasurement
208
134
Finance charge
(1,157)
(1,699)
Lease repayments
3,475
4,424
Balance at 31 March
2025/26
2024/25
Current and non-current
£'000
£'000
968
922
Current
2,507
3,502
Non-current
3,475
4,424
Balance at 31 March
2025/26
2024/25
Maturity analysis
£'000
£'000
1,132
1,157
Not later than one year
2,704
3,836
Later than one year and not later than five years
0
0
Later than five years
(361)
(569)
Discounted using the incremental borrowing rate
3,475
4,424
Total lease liabilities
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
111
13.
Dilapidation provisions
2025/26
2024/25
Office accommodation
£'000
£'000
1,286
485
Balance at 1 April
0
817
Additions
0
(40)
Remeasurement
28
24
Unwinding of discount
1,314
1,286
Balance at 31 March
2025/26
2024/25
Current and non-current
£'000
£'000
747
718
Current
567
568
Non-current
1,314
1,286
Balance at 31 March
2025/26
2024/25
Maturity analysis
£'000
£'000
747
747
Not later than one year
660
660
Later than one year and not later than five years
0
0
Later than five years
(93)
(121)
Discounted using the incremental borrowing rate
1,314
1,286
Total dilapidation provisions
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
112
14.
Related party transactions
Transactions with related parties
The FRC is an executive non-departmental public body of DBT. DBT is therefore regarded as a related party. As at the reporting date, DBT provided £7,400 (2024/25: £8,800) of funding towards the Recognition Arrangements Grant Programme and Companies House (an Executive Agency of DBT) contributed £119,700 (2024/25: £118,000) towards the XBRL Taxonomies project.
There were no related party transactions undertaken by key management personnel with the FRC during the year.
Total key management personnel compensation
2025/26
2024/25
£'000
£'000
1,893
1,802
Fees & Staff Costs
186
129
Other pension costs
2,079
1,931
Sub total
270
206
Social security costs
2,349
2,137
Total
15.
Significant transactions with other standard setters
With the agreement of HM Treasury, DBT and the FCA, the FRC has, since 2008, taken the responsibility for collecting the UK contribution to the IFRS Foundation alongside its preparer's levy. The FRC acts as an intermediary collection agent and the amounts do not go through its financial statements. The FRC makes a small charge for providing this
service. As at the reporting date, the FRC raised £1,002,000 (2024/25: £921,000), of which
£12,000 (2024/25: £21,000) remained to be paid to the IFRS Foundation.
16.
Liability of directors
The directors of the FRC have undertaken to contribute a sum not exceeding £1 each to meet the liabilities of the Company if it should be wound up.
17.
Contingent liabilities
In the normal course of business, the FRC is involved in a range of matters that could give rise to contingent liabilities. These typically include employee relations issues, potential legal challenges to regulatory decisions, and other proceedings where outcomes depend on future events outside of the organisation's control.
At the balance sheet date there is an employment-related claim, the timing and amount of which is uncertain, but based on the current assessment any amount paid is unlikely to be material.
18.
Events after the reporting period
The FRC has no events after the reporting period to disclose at the reporting date.
FRC | Annual Report and Accounts 2025/26
113
Financial Reporting Council London office:
The FRC does not accept any liability to any party for any loss, damage or costs howsoever arising, whether directly or indirectly, whether in contract, tort or otherwise from any action or decision taken (or not taken) as a result of any person relying on or otherwise using this document or arising from any omission from it.
13th Floor, 1 Harbour Exchange Square, London, E14 9GE
Birmingham office: 5th Floor, 3 Arena Central, Bridge Street, Birmingham, B1 2AX
© The Financial Reporting Council Limited 2026
The Financial Reporting Council Limited is a company limited by guarantee.
Registered in England number 02486368. Registered Office: 13th Floor, 1 Harbour Exchange Square, London, E14 9GE
+44 (0)20 7492 2300
E03570234
www.frc.org.uk Follow us on
ISBN 978-1-5286-6337-3
falseCCH SoftwareiXBRL Review & Tag 2025.22026-03-31false2025-04-01true024863682025-04-012026-03-31024863682026-03-3102486368countries:UnitedKingdom2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Chairman2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:ChiefExecutive2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director12025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director22025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director3bus:Non-executiveOfficer2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director4bus:Non-executiveOfficer2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director5bus:Non-executiveOfficer2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director6bus:Non-executiveOfficer2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director8bus:Non-executiveOfficer2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director7bus:Non-executiveOfficer2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director9bus:ExecutiveOfficer2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director10bus:ExecutiveOfficer2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director11bus:ExecutiveOfficer2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director12bus:ExecutiveOfficer2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Director132025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Chairman2026-03-3102486368bus:ChiefExecutive2026-03-3102486368bus:Director22026-03-3102486368bus:Director12026-03-3102486368bus:Director32026-03-3102486368bus:Director42026-03-3102486368bus:Director52026-03-3102486368bus:Director62026-03-3102486368bus:Director82026-03-3102486368bus:Director102026-03-3102486368direp:Y2525thPercentile2025-04-012026-03-3102486368direp:Y2525thPercentile2024-04-012025-03-3102486368direp:Y50Median2025-04-012026-03-3102486368direp:Y50Median2024-04-012025-03-3102486368direp:Y7575thPercentile2025-04-012026-03-3102486368direp:Y7575thPercentile2024-04-012025-03-31024863682024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve1ComponentTotalEquity2024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve2ComponentTotalEquity2024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve3ComponentTotalEquity2024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve4ComponentTotalEquity2024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve1ComponentTotalEquity2025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve2ComponentTotalEquity2025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve3ComponentTotalEquity2025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve4ComponentTotalEquity2025-04-012026-03-31024863682025-03-3102486368core:ComputerSoftware2026-03-3102486368core:ComputerSoftware2025-03-3102486368core:ComputerSoftware2024-03-3102486368core:LeaseholdImprovements2026-03-3102486368core:OfficeEquipment2026-03-3102486368core:FurnitureFittings2026-03-3102486368core:Right-of-useAssets2026-03-3102486368core:LeaseholdImprovements2025-03-3102486368core:OfficeEquipment2025-03-3102486368core:FurnitureFittings2025-03-3102486368core:Right-of-useAssets2025-03-3102486368core:LeaseholdImprovements2024-03-3102486368core:OfficeEquipment2024-03-3102486368core:FurnitureFittings2024-03-3102486368core:Right-of-useAssets2024-03-31024863682024-03-3102486368core:DecommissioningRestorationDilapidations2026-03-3102486368core:DecommissioningRestorationDilapidations2025-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve1ComponentTotalEquity2026-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve1ComponentTotalEquity2025-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve2ComponentTotalEquity2026-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve2ComponentTotalEquity2025-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve3ComponentTotalEquity2026-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve3ComponentTotalEquity2025-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve4ComponentTotalEquity2026-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve4ComponentTotalEquity2025-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve1ComponentTotalEquity2024-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve2ComponentTotalEquity2024-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve3ComponentTotalEquity2024-03-3102486368core:FurtherSpecificReserve4ComponentTotalEquity2024-03-310248636812025-04-012026-03-310248636812024-04-012025-03-31024863682025-03-3102486368bus:FullIFRS2025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:DecommissioningRestorationDilapidations2025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:ReportableOperatingSegment12025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:ReportableOperatingSegment22025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:FurnitureFittings2025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:LeaseholdImprovements2025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:OfficeEquipment2025-04-012026-03-310248636812025-04-012026-03-310248636822025-04-012026-03-310248636832025-04-012026-03-310248636842025-04-012026-03-310248636852025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:ReportableOperatingSegment32025-04-012026-03-310248636822025-04-012026-03-310248636822024-04-012025-03-310248636832025-04-012026-03-310248636832024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:ComputerSoftware2025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:ComputerSoftware2024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:LeaseholdImprovements2025-03-3102486368core:OfficeEquipment2025-03-3102486368core:FurnitureFittings2025-03-3102486368core:Right-of-useAssets2025-03-3102486368core:Right-of-useAssets2025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:LeaseholdImprovements2024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:OfficeEquipment2024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:FurnitureFittings2024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:Right-of-useAssets2024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:LeaseholdImprovements12025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:OfficeEquipment12025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:FurnitureFittings12025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:Right-of-useAssets12025-04-012026-03-3102486368core:LeaseholdImprovements12024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:OfficeEquipment12024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:FurnitureFittings12024-04-012025-03-3102486368core:Right-of-useAssets12024-04-012025-03-310248636812026-03-310248636812025-03-310248636822025-03-3102486368core:WithinOneYear2026-03-3102486368core:WithinOneYear2025-03-3102486368core:BetweenOneFiveYears2026-03-3102486368core:BetweenOneFiveYears2025-03-3102486368core:MoreThanFiveYears2026-03-3102486368core:MoreThanFiveYears2025-03-310248636812025-04-012026-03-310248636812025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Landline2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:CompanyLimitedByGuarantee2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:Audited2025-04-012026-03-3102486368bus:FullAccounts2025-04-012026-03-31xbrli:purexbrli:sharesiso4217:GBP