The directors present their annual report and financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2025.

The principal activity of the company is the supply of veterinary products sourced from group companies, sold onward to UK distributors.

The directors who held office during the year and up to the date of signature of the financial statements were as follows:

The company has made qualifying third party indemnity provisions for the benefit of its directors during the year. These provisions remain in force at the reporting date.

The company continues to operate as UK distributor of products supplied by the wider Jorgen Kruuse group. The directors continue to have regard to the demand for the company's products, the operations of the business and the availability of appropriate funding for the company's day to day requirements.

At 31 December 2025, the company had cash of £37,109 (2024: £22,513) and net current assets of £599,546 (2024: £1,493,433) including intercompany debtors due from other group companies of £625,886 (2024: £1,592,531).

The company is reliant upon group companies for the supply of goods for sale into the UK market and is party to a group cash pooling arrangement. The immediate parent company has confirmed that it will continue its supply arrangement with the company, that the company will have continued access to the group cash pooling arrangement, as needed, and that the company will be supported to meet its liabilities as they fall due by settlement of the intercompany amounts due to the company, as needed.  Through common directorship between the company and the parent company, the directors have been able to satisfy themselves that the parent company has the ability to provide this support.

Whilst recognising the uncertainty across the wider economy, the directors have concluded that the company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence, and it is appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis.

The auditors, BDO LLP are deemed to be reappointed under section 487(2) of the Companies Act 2006.

So far as each person who was a director at the date of approving this report is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the company’s auditor is unaware. Additionally, the directors individually have taken all the necessary steps that they ought to have taken as directors in order to make themselves aware of all relevant audit information and to establish that the company’s auditor is aware of that information.

This report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions applicable to companies entitled to the small companies exemption.

The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the profit or loss of the company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:

• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

• make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and

• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

In our opinion the financial statements:

• give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2025 and of its profit for the year then ended;

• have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and

• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

We have audited the financial statements of Kruuse UK Limited (“the Company”) for the year ended 31 December 2025 which comprise of the following:

• Profit and loss account

• Balance sheet

• Statement of changes in equity

• Notes 1 to 10 to the financial statements including a summary of significant accounting policies

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence

We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

Conclusions relating to going concern

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue. However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

Other information

The Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report and Financial Statements, other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

Other Companies Act 2006 reporting

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:

• the information given in the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and

• the Directors’ report has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the Directors’ report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:

• adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

• the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

• certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or

• we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or

• the Directors were not entitled to prepare the financial statements in accordance with the small companies regime and take advantage of the small companies’ exemptions in preparing the Directors’ report and from the requirement to prepare a Strategic report.

As explained more fully in the Directors' responsibilities statement, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements. However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both those charged with governance of the Company and management.

Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:

Non-compliance with laws and regulations

Based on:

• Our understanding of the Company and the industry in which it operates;

• Discussion with management and those charged with governance; and

• Obtaining an understanding of the Company’s policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws and regulations.

We considered the significant laws and regulations to be Financial Reporting Standard 102, UK company law and UK tax legislation.

The Company is also subject to laws and regulations where the consequence of non-compliance could have a material effect on the amount or disclosures in the financial statements, for example through the imposition of fines or litigations. We identified such laws and regulations to be anti-bribery, money laundering and tax evasion legislation, the health and safety legislation and data protection legislation.

Our procedures in respect of the above included:

• Enquires of management whether there were any litigations and claims;

• Review of financial statement disclosures and agreeing to supporting documentation; and

• Review of legal expenditure accounts to understand the nature of expenditure incurred.

Fraud

We assessed the susceptibility of the financial statements to material misstatement, including fraud. Our risk assessment procedures included:

• Enquiry with management and those charged with governance regarding any known or suspected instances of fraud;

• Obtaining an understanding of the Company’s policies and procedures relating to:

  • Detecting and responding to the risks of fraud; and

  • Internal controls established to mitigate risks related to fraud.

• Discussion amongst the engagement team as to how and where fraud might occur in the financial statements; and

• Performing analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships that may indicate risks of material misstatement due to fraud.

Based on our risk assessment, we considered the areas most susceptible to fraud to be management override of controls through the posting of inappropriate journal entries to revenue, or the posting of inappropriate journals to cash to conceal fraudulent payments.

Our procedures in respect of the above included:

• Testing all journal entries throughout the year, which met defined risk criteria, by agreeing to supporting documentation; and

• Testing a sample of other journal entries made throughout the year, by agreeing to supporting documentation.

We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members who were all deemed to have appropriate competence and capabilities and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.

Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of material misstatement in the financial statements, recognising that the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery, misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures performed and the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely we are to become aware of it.

A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at:

https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

Use of our report

This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

The Profit And Loss Account has been prepared on the basis that all operations are continuing operations.

There was no other comprehensive income for 2025 (2024 - £nil).

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the provisions applicable to companies subject to the small companies regime.

Kruuse UK Limited is a private company limited by shares incorporated in England and Wales. The registered office is Ground Floor Distington House, 26 Atlas Way, Sheffield, United Kingdom, S4 7QQ.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with FRS 102 “The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland” (“FRS 102”) and the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 as applicable to companies subject to the small companies regime. The disclosure requirements of section 1A of FRS 102 have been applied other than where additional disclosure is required to show a true and fair view.

The financial statements are prepared in sterling, which is the functional currency of the company. Monetary amounts in these financial statements are rounded to the nearest £.

The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention. The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below.

The company continues to operate as UK distributor of products supplied by the wider Jorgen Kruuse group. The directors continue to have regard to the demand for the company's products, the operations of the business and the availability of appropriate funding for the company's day to day requirements.

At 31 December 2025, the company had cash of £37,109 (2024: £22,513) and net current assets of £599,546 (2024: £1,493,433) including intercompany debtors due from other group companies of £624,994 (2024: £1,592,531).

The company is reliant upon group companies for the supply of goods for sale into the UK market and is party to a group cash pooling arrangement. The immediate parent company has confirmed that it will continue its supply arrangement with the company, that the company will have continued access to the group cash pooling arrangement, as needed, and that the company will be supported to meet its liabilities as they fall due by settlement of the intercompany amounts due to the company, as needed.  Through common directorship between the company and the parent company, the directors have been able to satisfy themselves that the parent company has the ability to provide this support.

Whilst recognising the uncertainty across the wider economy, the directors have concluded that the company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence, and it is appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis.

Turnover is recognised at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable for goods and services provided in the normal course of business, and is shown net of VAT and other sales related taxes. The fair value of consideration takes into account trade discounts, settlement discounts and volume rebates.

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to the buyer, the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity and the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably. This is typically at the point of delivery of the goods to the customer.

Cash at bank and in hand are basic financial assets and include cash in hand and deposits held at call with banks.

The company is required to apply the provisions of Section 11 ‘Basic Financial Instruments’ and Section 12 ‘Other Financial Instruments Issues’ of FRS 102 to all of its financial instruments.

Financial instruments are recognised in the company's balance sheet when the company becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

Financial assets and liabilities are offset, with the net amounts presented in the financial statements, when there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

Basic financial assets, which include trade and intercompany debtors and cash and bank balances, are measured at transaction price including transaction costs.

Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the company after deducting all of its liabilities.

Basic financial liabilities, including creditors, are recognised at transaction price.

Trade creditors are obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business from suppliers. Amounts payable are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less. If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities. Trade creditors are recognised at transaction price.

Equity instruments issued by the company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of transaction costs. Dividends payable on equity instruments are recognised as liabilities once they are no longer at the discretion of the company.

The tax expense represents the sum of the current tax payable and deferred tax.

The current tax payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from profit before tax as reported in the profit and loss account because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The company’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting end date.

Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all timing differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that they will be recovered against the reversal of deferred tax liabilities or other future taxable profits. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if the timing difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the tax profit nor the accounting profit.

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting end date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the profit and loss account, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when the company has a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority.

Payments to defined contribution retirement benefit schemes are charged as an expense as they fall due.

Judgements

The following judgements have had the most significant effect on amounts recognised in the financial statements.

The Company has circumstances in its dealing with customers whereby it needs to determine if it acts as a principal or agent in the supply of product to its customers. If the Company decides it is acting as a principal it would record the selling value as revenue, whereas if it decided it was acting as an agent it would record the commission received as revenue. The directors determined that the Company acts as a principal based on the relevant criteria as included in FRS 102. The key factors included in making this judgement were that the Company still having the ability to set the price of goods and services provided, as well as taking the credit risk of such sales.

In the application of the company’s accounting policies, the directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised where the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods where the revision affects both current and future periods.

In the view of the directors, there are no estimates made that would have a material impact on the financial statements.

The average monthly number of persons employed by the company during the year was:

Within amounts owed by group undertakings is an amount owed by Jørgen Kruuse A/S of £416,324. This amount bears interest of 2.5% and has no set repayment date.

During the year the company entered into the following transactions with related parties:

Jorgen Kruuse A/S

During the year the company purchased goods and services from the immediate parent company Jorgen Kruuse A/S of £2,079,184 (2024 - £2,399,839).

At the balance sheet date the amount due from Jorgen Kruuse was £416,324 (2024 - £1,487,335).

AH UK Animal Health (PVT) LTD t/a Covetrus

A company under the common control of Covetrus Inc.

During the year the company has made sales to AH UK Animal Health (PVT) LTD t/a Covetrus amounting to £888,888 (2024 - £1,070,286).

At the balance sheet date the amount due from AH UK Animal Health (PVT) LTD t/a Covetrus was £184,835 (2024 - £105,196).

Covetrus Animal Health Holdings Limited

A company under the common control of Coventrus Inc.

At the balance sheet date the amount due to Covetrus Animal Health Holdings Limited was £46,210 (2024 - £43,168).

Covetrus Inc.

During the year the company purchased services from Covetrus Inc. for £6,871 (2024 - £6,720).

The company's immediate parent is Jorgen Kruuse A/S, incorporated in Denmark.

The ultimate parent is Corgi Bidco Inc, incorporated in USA.

The parent of the largest group in which these financial statements are consolidated is Corgi Bidco Inc, incorporated in the United States of America.

The address of Corgi Bidco Inc is:

400 Metro Place North

Dublin

Ohio 43017-3378

United States of America