The directors present the strategic report for the period ended 31 December 2025.

On 31 January 2026, a special resolution was passed to change the company's name from Thyssenkrupp System Engineering Limited to Krause Automation Ltd. On 31 March 2026, the company was sold to Krause Automation SE, a subsidiary of Agile Robots SE.

The principal activities of the company during the period ended 31 December 2025 were:

• Servicing and modification to automotive engine assembly lines.

• Design, manufacture and installation of engine assembly ‘In Line’ equipment.

The results of the company for the three month period ended 31 December 2025 and the state of affairs at that date are shown in the financial statements on pages 10 to 23.

The overall financial result is an operating loss recorded of £510,106 (2025: £24,294 profit). The gross profit margin for the period includes larger lower margin projects and the negative impacts of some specific smaller projects. Diversification efforts for customers continues to enable the business to reduce its dependency on our historic small number of customers.

KPI’s explained:

• Orders - Represents orders received from customers during the financial period.

• Revenue - Represents the revenue reported through the income statement.

• Operating (loss) / profit - Represents (losses) / profits before interest paid/received and before corporation tax payments.

• Operating (loss) / profit return on sales - Represents the proportion of earnings before interest and corporation tax payments generated from sales in the financial period.

• Net cash pool funds / (borrowings) - Represents the intercompany funding of the company deposited in or borrowed from group bank accounts at the end of the financial period.

• Net assets – Represents net assets from Statement of financial position.

Engine assembly

The three month period order intake was a little smaller than expected following negative shifts in the local and global markets. The business continued its efforts to diversify its customer base and the scope of the products it offers within Powertrain including EDU (Electrical Drive Units) and Fuel Cells / Electrolysers.

The majority of order intake came from FMC Ltd as well as JLR Ltd and was a mix of new E-Drive work and traditional Combustion products. The company continued progress into the Hydrogen market and this continues the transition to emerging areas of the business while supporting existing infrastructure.

Aerospace

The business continued to deliver small maintenance contracts for aerospace customers in the UK and this work remains a part of the business portfolio.

The customer base is largely within the UK OEM automotive industry and as such is impacted by changes in industry and economic market conditions. Levels of investment within the UK are mixed and predicting market strength in the short and mid-term is extremely difficult.

The risk that key customers could change suppliers is constant. However, the System Engineering (SY) business has been built on long standing successful business relationships and will strive to maintain these by providing a value-added service to our customers.

Expectations remain that customers will continue to maintain engine assembly lines into the medium term with the need to improve emission standards and the business remains well placed to support this. These expectations are in addition to the development of E-Drive and other electrification activities. Further to that, there is now clear significant investment into Hydrogen and the company expects to provide an increasing number of Fuel Cell and Electrolyser solutions.

The directors’ overarching duty is to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its shareholders, with consideration of stakeholders’ interests, as set out in section 172. The board regards a well governed business as essential for the successful delivery of its principal activity.

The directors are aware of their duty under section 172 to act in the way which they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole and, in doing so, to have regard (amongst other matters) to:

a) the likely consequences of any decision in the long term;

The directors in conjunction with the Managing Director would take the due time and diligence to consider how any decision would affect the company in the long term. Any significant decision would require the Boards consensus and agreement before any action was taken. This ensures a ‘four eyes’ approach.

b) the interests of the company’s employees;

The directors in conjunction with the Managing Director would always consider the interests of the company’s employees in all of their potential guises. This would feed up to the directors from the local management team who would engage with their teams and feedback any relevant information. Ultimately the local Managing Director fosters a very team centred approach to business.

c) the need to foster the company’s business relationships with suppliers, customers and others;

This requirement is attended to at all levels from the directors, through to every employee who engages with external companies in conjunction with our own. This is reinforced by the company’s mission statement which outlines the behavioural expectation which will feed through to foster positive and fruitful relationships. Further to this, we also hold ourselves accountable to a compliance policy which ensures we act with the utmost integrity.

d) the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment;

This requirement is attended to at all levels from the directors through to every employee but also via our Quality System and employees who directly operate in this function. Being ISO accredited ensures we are held to certain standards to reduce our impact on the local community and environment also. It is worth noting that the company has previously achieved implementation of ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 across the business activities and locations.

e) the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct:

Similarly to point ‘c’ this requirement is reinforced by the local Managing Director and upheld by the company’s mission statement and code of conduct. It is attended to at all levels from the directors, through to every employee who engages with external companies in conjunction with our own. Further to this, we also hold ourselves accountable to a compliance policy which ensures we act with the utmost integrity.

f) the need to act fairly as between members of the company.

As referred to in point ‘e’ and more generally in all of the above, we operate with an appropriate conduct and disciplinary policy.

The company is a subsidiary of Krause Automation SE (formerly thyssenkrupp UK Plc) and a UK subsidiary of Agile Robots SE (formerly thyssenkrupp AG), a robotics and artificial intelligence company based in Munich, Germany. Agile Robots SE is an internationally positioned group of largely independent and efficient industrial and technology companies, operating in Europe, America and Asia.

The board of Agile Robots SE manages the group’s operations on a global and divisional basis. From the perspective of the board, as a result of the group governance structure, the matters that it is responsible for considering under section 172 have been considered to an appropriate extent by the group and Krause Automation SE board in relation both to the group and to this entity. The board has also considered relevant matters where appropriate.

On behalf of the board

The directors present their annual report and financial statements for the period ended 31 December 2025.

On 31 January 2026, a special resolution was passed to change the company's name from Thyssenkrupp System Engineering Limited to Krause Automation Ltd.

The results for the period are set out on page 10.

No ordinary dividends were paid. The directors do not recommend payment of a final dividend.

The directors who held office during the period and up to the date of signature of the financial statements were as follows:

During the period under review the company purchased and maintained liability insurance for its directors as permitted by Section 233 of the Companies Act 2006. The company has indemnified each of its directors to cover any liabilities that may arise to a third party as defined by Section 234 of the Companies Act 2006. This indemnity was in force during the financial period and at the date of approval of these financial statements.

The auditor, Sumer Audit, is deemed to be reappointed under section 487(2) of the Companies Act 2006.

So far as each person who was a director at the date of approving this report is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the company’s auditor is unaware. Additionally, the directors individually have taken all the necessary steps that they ought to have taken as directors in order to make themselves aware of all relevant audit information and to establish that the company’s auditor is aware of that information.

This report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions applicable to companies entitled to the medium-sized companies exemption.

The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial period. Under that law the directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the profit or loss of the company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:

• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

• make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

• state whether applicable UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;

• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

We have audited the financial statements of Krause Automation Ltd (the 'company') for the period ended 31 December 2025 which comprise the statement of comprehensive income, the balance sheet, the statement of changes in equity, the statement of cash flows and notes to the financial statements, including significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

In our opinion the financial statements:

• give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 31 December 2025 and of its loss for the period then ended;

• have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and

• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Conclusions relating to going concern

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

Other information

The other information comprises the information included in the annual report other than the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of our audit:

• the information given in the strategic report and the directors' report for the financial period for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and

• the strategic report and the directors' report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report or the directors' report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:

• adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

• the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

• certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or

• we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.

In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement in respect of irregularities, including fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations, our procedures included the following:

• Obtaining an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework that the company operates in, focusing on those laws and regulations that had a direct effect on the financial statements and operations;

• Obtaining an understanding of the company’s policies and procedures on fraud risks, including

knowledge of any actual, suspected or alleged fraud; and

• Discussing among the engagement team how and where fraud might occur in the financial statements and any potential indicators of fraud through our knowledge and understanding of the company and our sector-specific experience.

As a result of these procedures, we considered the opportunities and incentives that may exist within the company for fraud. We are also required to perform specific procedures to respond to the risk of management override. As a result of performing the above, we identified the following areas as those most likely to have an impact on the financial statements: health & safety, employment law and compliance with the UK Companies Act.

In addition to the above, our procedures to respond to risks identified included the following:

• Making enquiries of management about any known or suspected instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations and fraud;

• Challenging assumptions and judgements made by management in their significant accounting estimates; and

• Auditing the risk of management override of controls, including through testing journal entries and other adjustments for appropriateness.

Due to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements in the financial statements may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with the ISAs (UK). For instance, the further removed non-compliance is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely the auditor is to become aware of it or to recognise the non-compliance.

A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor's report.

Use of our report

This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

The profit and loss account has been prepared on the basis that all operations are continuing operations.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the provisions relating to medium-sized companies.

Krause Automation Ltd is a private company limited by shares incorporated in England and Wales. The registered office is Unit 5, The Felbridge Centre, East Grinstead, West Sussex, RH19 1XP.

The financial statements have been prepared for a 3 month period and the comparative period is 12 months. This is to bring the accounting period in line with the new group companies. As a result the comparative period amounts in the financial statements will not be entirely comparable.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with FRS 102 “The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland” (“FRS 102”) and the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

The financial statements are prepared in sterling, which is the functional currency of the company. Monetary amounts in these financial statements are rounded to the nearest £1.

The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention. The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below.

At the time of approving the financial statements, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. The directors have considered relevant information, including the company’s principal risks and uncertainties, the annual budget, forecast future cash flows and the impact of subsequent events in making their assessment.  true

Based on these assessments and having regard to the resources available to the entity, the directors have concluded that there is no material uncertainty and that they can continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the annual report and financial statements.

Revenue comprises sales of goods or services provided to customers net of value added tax and other sales taxes, less an appropriate deduction for actual and expected returns and discounts. Revenue is recognised when performance obligations are satisfied and the control of goods or services is transferred to the buyer. Where the performance obligation is satisfied over time, revenue is recognised in accordance with its progress towards complete satisfaction of that performance obligation.

All revenue generated by the company during the period arose from its principal activities and related to project works (project contract revenue). Revenue from the rendering of project work is recognised over time by reference to the stage of completion of the transaction once all factors can be measured reliably. Revenue is recognised over time as the project work primarily creates or enhances an asset that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced.

Revenue for projects exceeding £500,000 (2025: £500,000) is calculated as that proportion of total contract value which costs incurred to date bear to total expected costs for that contract, less amounts recognised in previous years when the outcome of the contract can be foreseen with reasonable certainty. Provision is made for any losses as soon as they are foreseen. Revenue for projects less than £500,000 (2025: £500,000) are recognised only to the extent of costs incurred until completion of the project. Attributable profit is known only when the project is completed and accepted by the customer.

Tangible fixed assets other than right of use assets are initially measured at cost and subsequently measured at cost or valuation, net of depreciation and any impairment losses.

Depreciation is recognised so as to write off the cost or valuation of assets less their residual values over their useful lives on the following bases:

The gain or loss arising on the disposal of an asset is determined as the difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying value of the asset, and is credited or charged to profit or loss.

At each reporting period end date, the company reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any).

Stocks are stated at the lower of cost and estimated selling price less costs to complete and sell. Cost comprises direct materials and, where applicable, direct labour costs and those overheads that have been incurred in bringing the stocks to their present location and condition.

Cash and cash equivalents are basic financial assets and include cash in hand and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities.

The company has elected to apply the provisions of Section 11 ‘Basic Financial Instruments’ and Section 12 ‘Other Financial Instruments Issues’ of FRS 102 to all of its financial instruments.

Basic financial assets, which include debtors and cash and bank balances, are initially measured at transaction price including transaction costs and are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method unless the arrangement constitutes a financing transaction, where the transaction is measured at the present value of the future receipts discounted at a market rate of interest. Financial assets classified as receivable within one year are not amortised.

Other financial assets, including investments in equity instruments which are not subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures, are initially measured at fair value, which is normally the transaction price. Such assets are subsequently carried at fair value and the changes in fair value are recognised in profit or loss, except that investments in equity instruments that are not publicly traded and whose fair values cannot be measured reliably are measured at cost less impairment.

Financial assets, other than those held at fair value through profit and loss, are assessed for indicators of impairment at each reporting end date.

Financial assets are impaired where there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset, the estimated future cash flows have been affected. If an asset is impaired, the impairment loss is the difference between the carrying amount and the present value of the estimated cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. The impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss.

If there is a decrease in the impairment loss arising from an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the impairment is reversed. The reversal is such that the current carrying amount does not exceed what the carrying amount would have been, had the impairment not previously been recognised. The impairment reversal is recognised in profit or loss.

Financial assets are derecognised only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or are settled, or when the company transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to another entity, or if some significant risks and rewards of ownership are retained but control of the asset has transferred to another party that is able to sell the asset in its entirety to an unrelated third party.

Basic financial liabilities, including creditors and loans from fellow group companies are initially recognised at transaction price unless the arrangement constitutes a financing transaction, where the debt instrument is measured at the present value of the future payments discounted at a market rate of interest. Financial liabilities classified as payable within one year are not amortised.

Derivatives, including interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts, are not basic financial instruments. Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognised in profit or loss in finance costs or finance income as appropriate, unless hedge accounting is applied and the hedge is a cash flow hedge.

Debt instruments that do not meet the conditions in FRS 102 paragraph 11.9 are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. Debt instruments may be designated as being measured at fair value through profit or loss to eliminate or reduce an accounting mismatch or if the instruments are measured and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy.

Financial liabilities are derecognised when the company’s contractual obligations expire or are discharged or cancelled.

Equity instruments issued by the company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of transaction costs. Dividends payable on equity instruments are recognised as liabilities once they are no longer at the discretion of the company.

Provisions are recognised when the company has a legal or constructive present obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that the company will be required to settle that obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.

The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the reporting end date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount expected to be required to settle the obligation is recognised at present value. When a provision is measured at present value, the unwinding of the discount is recognised as a finance cost in profit or loss in the period in which it arises.

The costs of short-term employee benefits are recognised as a liability and an expense.

Payments to defined contribution retirement benefit schemes are charged as an expense as they fall due.

Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessees. All other leases are classified as operating leases.

Assets held under finance leases are recognised as assets at the lower of the assets fair value at the date of inception and the present value of the minimum lease payments. The related liability is included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments are treated as consisting of capital and interest elements. The interest is charged to profit or loss so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.

The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial measurement of the lease liability adjusted for lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives or grants received, plus initial direct costs and an estimate of the cost of obligations to dismantle, remove or restore the underlying asset and the site on which it is located.

The right-of-use asset is subsequently adjusted for remeasurements of the lease liability and applies the relevant cost model. Where the cost model is applied, the asset is depreciated from the commencement date to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term, and is periodically reduced by impairment losses, if any.

The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are unpaid at the commencement date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the company's incremental borrowing rate or the company’s obtainable borrowing rate. Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise fixed payments less any lease incentives receivable, variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, amounts expected to be payable under residual value guarantees, the exercise price of any purchase options that the company is reasonably certain to exercise, and any penalties for early termination of a lease.

In the application of the company’s accounting policies, the directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised where the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods where the revision affects both current and future periods.

The average monthly number of persons (including directors) employed by the company during the period was:

Their aggregate remuneration comprised:

The number of directors for whom retirement benefits are accruing under defined contribution schemes amounted to 1 (2025 - 1).

The actual charge for the period can be reconciled to the expected credit for the period based on the profit or loss and the standard rate of tax as follows:

There were no expenses during the period relating to short-term leases, to leases of low-value assets that are not shown above as short-term leases and to variable lease payments not included in lease payments.

Amounts owed to group undertakings are unsecured, have no fixed date of repayment and are repayable on demand. Amounts owed to group undertakings of £689,893 (2025: £1,082,835) relate to the intercompany cash pool account and are interest bearing at variable rates. Other amounts owed to group undertakings of £36,882 (2025: £11,166) are unsecured, have no fixed date of repayment and are repayable on demand.

Dilapidations provision

This relates to the expected dilapidation costs of returning a leasehold property to the state of condition required by the lease at its termination. These costs will be incurred within five years of the balance sheet date.

Warranty provisions

The warranty provision relates to warranties given to customers. The directors have provided for claims that are expected to arise between the balance sheet date and the expiry of warranty. It is expected that this expenditure will be incurred within two years of the balance sheet date. No warranty claims were received in the period.

The following are the major deferred tax liabilities and assets recognised by the company and movements thereon:

The company operates a defined contribution pension scheme for all qualifying employees. The assets of the scheme are held separately from those of the company in an independently administered fund.

On 31 March 2026, Krause Automation Ltd (formerly thyssenkrupp System Engineering Limited) was sold to Krause Automation SE, a subsidiary of Agile Robots SE.

During the financial period, the intermediate parent undertaking was thyssenkrupp UK Plc, a company incorporated in the United Kingdom. The registered office is Cox's Lane, Cradley Heath, West Midlands, B64 5QU, England. From 31 March 2026, the immediate parent undertaking changed to Krause Automation SE, a company incorporated in Germany. The registered office is Plinganserstraße 134, 81369 Munich, Germany.

During the financial period, the ultimate parent company was thyssenkrupp AG, a company incorporated in Germany. This is the largest and smallest group within which thyssenkrupp System Engineering Limited will be consolidated. The consolidated financial statements of thyssenkrupp AG can be obtained from thyssenkrupp, Allee 1, Postfach 45063, 45143 Essen, Germany. From 31 March 2026, the ultimate parent undertaking changed to Agile Robots SE, a company incorporated in Germany. The consolidated financial statements of Agile Robots SE in the future will be obtained from Plinganserstraße 134, 81369 Munich, Germany.